Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Reviews

Vendor: Forcepoint
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is a versatile and comprehensive solution for perimeter security, offering features such as SD-WAN, IPS, VPN, and cloud or on-premises subscription keys. It is preferred by many clients over Cisco and is used for obligation redundancy, VPN access, and as the main point of security in infrastructure. 

Get the Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense and more!
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is the #13 ranked solution in SD-WAN tools, #13 ranked solution in top WAN Edge solutions, and #31 ranked solution in best firewalls. PeerSpot users give Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall an average rating of 7.6 out of 10. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is most commonly compared to Fortinet FortiGate: Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Fortinet FortiGate. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 51% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 15% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
September 2025
Get the report
Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Featured Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall reviews

Read more reviews

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall mindshare

Product category:
Firewalls
As of September 2025, the mindshare of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall in the Firewalls category stands at 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewalls Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall0.5%
Fortinet FortiGate20.1%
Netgate pfSense11.1%
Other68.3%
Firewalls

PeerResearch reports based on Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryFirewallsSep 14, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 14, 2025Download
ComparisonForcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Fortinet FortiGateSep 14, 2025Download
ComparisonForcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Netgate pfSenseSep 14, 2025Download
ComparisonForcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs OPNsenseSep 14, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Fortinet FortiGate4.220.1%91%411 interviewsAdd to research
Netgate pfSense4.311.1%93%217 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall's most valuable features include integrated multi-layer filtering, centralized management, advanced threat protection, scalability, and strong connectivity options. It excels in application control, URL filtering, real-time traffic logging, and SD-WAN capabilities. Users find its user-friendly interface and support advantageous, benefiting from VPN services and sandboxing. Its management console facilitates easy control of multiple firewalls, enhancing secure, efficient operations through features like IPS, DDoS prevention, and detailed logging capabilities.
  • "The most valuable features of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall are the advanced threat protection, including features like IPS and DDoS prevention, which help avoid internal DDoS attacks."
  • "With Forcepoint, this process is simplified compared to others like Fortinet."
  • "We're trying to use all the firewall's features. Most of the features were effective, but the usability is a huge concern."

Room for Improvement

Users express the need for improved optimization and a more user-friendly interface. Enhancements in training and support are critical, particularly in regions like MENA. Features such as better API integration, improved VPN capabilities, and advanced application control are desired. Licensing flexibility and pricing competitiveness are significant concerns. There are also demands for enhanced threat detection, easier configuration, and efficient log management. Overall, a focus on hardware design and management tools is necessary.
  • "Technical support is sometimes slow to respond, and it takes longer to resolve issues."
  • "It is really hard to work with their customer support. For example, unlike Fortinet where you can escalate an issue and quickly get responses from the development team, Forcepoint's process seems slow and challenging."
  • "My experience with this Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall wasn't very pleasant due to its complexity. For example, the firewall loses some features when working in a cluster, which is a huge challenge. It caused me several weeks to solve an issue to make the VPN work, even after opening several cases with support. Also, the debug, which should provide essential knowledge about everything going on, the flow of traffic, and how the engine works, wasn't very informative in identifying the issue."

ROI

Users experienced significant cost savings and improved network security with Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall. Enhanced threat detection capabilities reduced incidents, minimizing downtime and operational issues. Automated processes led to lower administrative overhead, resulting in efficiency. Better control over network traffic also helped optimize resource allocation, further reducing expenses.

Pricing

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers a range of models with cost adaptable to various needs. Pricing is seen as moderate to expensive compared to competitors like Fortinet and Palo Alto. Licensing is typically offered in one, three, or five-year terms, with options to increase support levels for additional fees. Some users find licensing complex, as separate licenses may be required for additional features, but others praise the unlimited user option as crucial to their requirements.
  • "There is a need to make payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The product is not expensive."
  • "It is an affordable product. We purchase its yearly license."
  • "The solution is expensive."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall for perimeter security and internet access. It manages networks, providing features like SSL decryption, VPN, and SD-WAN. Utilized in environments such as schools, governments, and financial institutions, it ensures security through URL filtering, intrusion detection, and malware protection. Clients deploy it on-premises or in private clouds, using centralized management to oversee multiple devices. Forcepoint is part of broader security strategies, enhancing perimeter network safeguarding.

Service and Support

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall customer support varies in quality. Response times can be slow due to location in Europe, with some users finding support skilled yet delayed. Users report mixed experiences, from satisfactory interactions to challenges in obtaining timely responses. Some appreciate the technical expertise and 24-hour availability, while others cite issues with response speed and problem resolution. Users suggest improvements in technical support response and logistics for better service efficiency.

Deployment

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall's initial setup varies in complexity. Some users find it straightforward, especially with experience or assistance. Others describe it as complex due to specific configurations or infrastructure diversity. Deployment duration ranges from minutes to several days, contingent on features and environment. Multiple users highlight the necessity of specialized personnel for successful implementation, while lacking documentation adds challenges. Maintenance and support often involve multiple administrators or teams.

Scalability

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is highly scalable, rated positively for its ability to expand and manage network traffic. It can accommodate diverse environments from small businesses to large enterprises. Clustering and SD-WAN capabilities enhance scalability, though some basic models may have limitations. Users appreciate the ease of adding devices and upgrading models. While it's effective for on-premises use, some mention limitations in cloud deployments. Scalability is adaptable for various user needs and budgets.

Stability

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is widely appreciated for its stability. Users consistently report its robustness with minimal stability issues since implementation. It efficiently handles attacks and maintains reliability without bugs or crashes. Some encountered issues with complex deployments or log management, yet generally, it is deemed stable and reliable. High ratings of eight or nine out of ten are common, reflecting satisfaction with its performance across different company sizes and configurations.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business80
Midsize Enterprise41
Large Enterprise126
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Retailer
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
University
4%
Media Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%

Compare Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall

The product is praised for its simplicity, flexibility, complete feature set, scalability, and central management capabilities. Other valuable features include IPS, firewall, sandbox, application control, filtering, security management center, connectivity, and integration capabilities.

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall was previously known as Forcepoint NGFW, Stonesoft Next Generation Firewall, McAfee Network Security Platform, Intel Security Network Security Platform.

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall customers

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)

Related questions

  • 4
Can you help me understand client requirements about Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?
  • 68
​What do you recommend for a corporate firewall implementation?
  • 91
Comparison of Barracuda F800, SonicWall 5600 and Fortinet
  • 331
Sophos XG 210 vs Fortigate FG 100E
  • 98
Which is the best network firewall for a small retailer?
  • 121
When evaluating Firewalls, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 55
Cyberoam or Fortinet?
  • 431
Fortinet, Palo Alto or Check Point?
  • 32
If you could go back, would you change your decision to buy that firewall and why?
  • 85
Sophos XG vs Fortigate UTM

Product Categories

Product Categories
Firewalls
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
WAN Edge
Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Netgate pfSense vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Netgate pfSense vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
OPNsense vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
OPNsense vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Sophos XG vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Sophos XG vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Cisco Secure Firewall vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Cisco Meraki MX vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Cisco Meraki MX vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Azure Firewall vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
SonicWall NSa vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
SonicWall NSa vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
Sangfor NGAF vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Logo
Sangfor NGAF vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
See all alternatives
 
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
CEO at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees4.5I find Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall reliable and competitively priced, with strong customer service and good performance, though pricing could improve; setup is straightforward for experts, and integration with third-party systems has been successful in our experience.
Sales Manager at Mega tech S.A3.5I primarily use Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall for banking applications due to its user-friendly cross-setup features, although technical support needs improvement. Despite being difficult to quantify, cybersecurity ROI is essential. I previously used Oracle, Fortinet, and Kaspersky.
Head of IT Department at Mana3.5We use Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall for security in our financial institution. Its advanced threat protection and centralized management enhance network efficiency and connectivity. However, the licensing model needs flexibility, and log storage performance has limitations.
Security Network Architect at Inmac3.0We use Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall internally, primarily as a gateway. Although it offers decent LAN protection, its interface is complex and not user-friendly, leading us to switch some features, like web filtering, to Cisco Umbrella.
Division Manager, Information Technology at Lonestar4.5We use Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall for perimeter network security and VPNs, finding its centralized management beneficial. Its URL filtering is vital but needs on-premise options. Previously using Symantec and Stonesoft, Forcepoint offers a worthwhile return on investment.
Cyber Security Head at Turnkey Integrated Technologies TK-IT3.0As an educational institution, we implemented Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall for comprehensive edge protection, yet found its complexity a challenge. Despite effective features, usability issues necessitate expert involvement, unlike user-friendly alternatives like Fortinet or Palo Alto.
American Corner Administrator at Hashimite university4.5I find Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall valuable for its extensive policy features, notably the S7 Pro and DNS security aspects. However, the absence of a VPN client in our region is a downside. It was the chosen solution after competitive analysis.
Co-founder | Product Manager | CEO @ ReDi at TRIAD Technologies4.0I use Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall for perimeter security across our offices. The most valuable feature is connecting both offices under one solution, though I wish alert integrations included platforms like WhatsApp for improved notifications.