

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and Check Point Harmony SASE compete in the network security solutions category. Check Point Harmony SASE has an upper hand due to its extensive feature set and better service consistency, whereas Forcepoint is favored for its pricing and support.
Features: User reviews highlight Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall's strong filtering capabilities and integration with other Forcepoint products. Check Point Harmony SASE is praised for its comprehensive cloud security and ease of use. Users prefer Harmony SASE's extensive feature set, making it seem superior in overall functionality.
Room for Improvement: Reviews indicate Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall could benefit from a more intuitive configuration process, enhanced reporting, and user-friendly design. Check Point Harmony SASE users suggest improvements in customer support and more customizable features to suit diverse needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is noted for its straightforward deployment but sometimes faces issues needing more support interaction. Check Point Harmony SASE also deploys easily but has more consistent customer service, making it favorable for ongoing support.
Pricing and ROI: Reviews reflect that Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is cost-effective, providing good ROI for its price. Check Point Harmony SASE, although pricier according to users, offers substantial ROI due to its extensive features, making it worthwhile for those seeking robust capabilities.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
Cybersecurity ROI could be $1 or $100 million, depending on the risk of data behind it.
It is easy and offers different solutions for each solution type with small, mid, and large scale options available.
I did see a return on investment with Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, as mentioned by the efficiency improvements and the metrics related to how much I cut investigation time, the number of incidents, and the ease of making changes or pushing new configurations.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
People working really hard, listening to every issue and request, and replying within hours.
Unlike Fortinet where you can escalate an issue and quickly get responses from the development team, Forcepoint's process seems slow and challenging.
TAC engineers are very experienced and troubleshoot issues within the expected timeframe with no problems.
We have a point of contact from the account manager to the presales representative, and they connect with the technical support team, providing support in Indian time, so we do not have to worry about US or European time zones.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
Check Point Harmony SASE's scalability is good; it can handle growth easily, allowing me to easily add another region and gateway to have more people join in.
I can have one management node similar to Palo Alto Panorama, with multiple nodes covering different sites, data centers, or zones.
Even if you have some firewalls in the cluster, it is not necessary to have them on the same version.
In a country such as India with a large population, we often need to scale up or down depending on projects and requirements, and it is very much easy to do both ways.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Check Point Harmony SASE is stable most of the time, but there are still some issues that are hard to troubleshoot.
It has many freezes for no reason.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall should make some improvements because there is some instability with their software.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
The product is lacking features that other competitors have, making it quite challenging to migrate customers to this solution because it feels very much unfinished.
Fast response and efficient handling of issues, similar to how Fortinet responds, would be great.
AI improvements could be beneficial, as having AI capabilities has become an important checkmark feature.
I recommend that additional features be included in a single license to avoid the need for extra licensing costs.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
The cost is a bit expensive for most users.
It is a bit expensive.
The costs can be high since additional features require separate licenses.
In terms of price, I would say Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is not expensive.
In terms of pricing, I would place Forcepoint in the middle when compared to other firewalls like Fortinet and Palo Alto.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The Zero Trust and segmentation have helped my team and our customers significantly because we are able to protect every scope and allow the work-from-home users to access internal resources while passing through a threat prevention gateway, ensuring that everything is safe.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has impacted my organization positively by making it very easy to work and offering a more competitive price compared to other vendors.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has positively impacted my organization by providing always-on perimeter security.
Strong network segmentation is my favorite feature that Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) | 1.0% |
| Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall | 1.0% |
| Other | 98.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.
Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.
What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?
How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?
Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers robust network protection with features like URL filtering and advanced threat protection, ensuring comprehensive security and operational efficiency across various infrastructures.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall integrates URL filtering and advanced threat protection, including intrusion prevention and DDoS prevention. The centralized management console provides application awareness, strong network segmentation, and SD-WAN capabilities. Its graphical interface enhances user experience, while efficient technical support and seamless integration offer stability and scalability. Companies use it for perimeter security, VPNs, and threat prevention, optimizing performance in diverse sectors.
What are the key features of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is widely implemented in sectors including finance, education, and government, offering security for data centers and managing remote access with IPsec VPN tunnels, SSL VPNs, and site-to-site connectivity. Companies appreciate its use for Unified Threat Management and automatic optimization, ensuring data security and efficient network performance.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.