

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and Check Point Cloud Firewall compete in the field of network security, each with distinct advantages. Forcepoint seems to hold an edge in cost-effectiveness and ease of use, while Check Point excels in threat defense and cloud integration.
Features: Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is designed with advanced threat protection, SD-WAN solutions, and centralized management, offering ease of use and cost savings as highlighted by users. On the other hand, Check Point Cloud Firewall provides comprehensive cloud security with auto-scaling and integration across multiple cloud platforms, illustrated by its superior threat defense features that justify its higher price point according to reviews.
Room for Improvement: Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall could benefit from interface optimization and the enhancement of AI-enabled features. Users have reported slowness and navigation complexities. For Check Point Cloud Firewall, there is a need for improvements in licensing flexibility and support for better cloud integration. Users have found it less user-friendly compared to alternatives such as Palo Alto.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers diverse deployment options and is generally praised for its user-friendly experience post-implementation, although its technical support can be erratic. Check Point Cloud Firewall accommodates a broad array of cloud deployment models, though its complex setup and inconsistent customer service have drawn some criticism.
Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is considered cost-effective due to competitive pricing and minimal overhead. Its return on investment is noted through centralized management efficiencies. Conversely, Check Point Cloud Firewall, despite higher licensing and operational costs, is acknowledged for its robust security features that contribute to long-term ROI according to user feedback.
The value lies in maintaining operational integrity with zero downtime or incidents, facilitating secure, ongoing business operations.
The compliance has improved as our overall compliance score against CIS benchmark has improved from around 72 to 92% within the first three months of adoption.
This helped my team cut manual review time by roughly twenty to twenty-five percent, allowing me to reallocate effort to proactive cloud security improvements.
Cybersecurity ROI could be $1 or $100 million, depending on the risk of data behind it.
It is easy and offers different solutions for each solution type with small, mid, and large scale options available.
I did see a return on investment with Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, as mentioned by the efficiency improvements and the metrics related to how much I cut investigation time, the number of incidents, and the ease of making changes or pushing new configurations.
They usually respond quite fast, and they are very knowledgeable about what they do.
We had an endless loop of emails trying to fix this, and the suggestion was to reinstall the gateway and do it from scratch, which was not an option at that point because it would leave that specific location without access.
I think TAC of Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) is very competent; they really know what they are doing.
Unlike Fortinet where you can escalate an issue and quickly get responses from the development team, Forcepoint's process seems slow and challenging.
TAC engineers are very experienced and troubleshoot issues within the expected timeframe with no problems.
We have a point of contact from the account manager to the presales representative, and they connect with the technical support team, providing support in Indian time, so we do not have to worry about US or European time zones.
Visibility scales without performance issues as my environment expands.
It is capable of managing the increased load and performs well as our needs expand.
I can deploy it everywhere I need it.
I can have one management node similar to Palo Alto Panorama, with multiple nodes covering different sites, data centers, or zones.
Even if you have some firewalls in the cluster, it is not necessary to have them on the same version.
In a country such as India with a large population, we often need to scale up or down depending on projects and requirements, and it is very much easy to do both ways.
The firewall itself, Gaia itself, tells you: "Look, there is this error, this problem; verify if your device is affected; if so, here is the solution."
If there are errors, it is sometimes challenging to elaborate or troubleshoot since it is not transparent enough to understand what to search for.
I have not observed any downtime.
It has many freezes for no reason.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall should make some improvements because there is some instability with their software.
Scalability could be improved as well; needing to purchase a new license each time I want to add a new interface is not ideal.
Better documentation would be welcome.
The user interface could be more intuitive, and the initial setup and configuration can be complex, requiring a technical team.
Fast response and efficient handling of issues, similar to how Fortinet responds, would be great.
AI improvements could be beneficial, as having AI capabilities has become an important checkmark feature.
I recommend that additional features be included in a single license to avoid the need for extra licensing costs.
The pricing and licensing are expensive, costing between seven thousand to eight thousand dollars.
Check Point is expensive, however, with the features and capabilities, I can justify the cost.
It is the highest in the market.
The costs can be high since additional features require separate licenses.
In terms of price, I would say Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is not expensive.
In terms of pricing, I would place Forcepoint in the middle when compared to other firewalls like Fortinet and Palo Alto.
One of the most valuable features is the automated threat prevention, which helps us detect and block potential cyberattacks in real-time, minimizing data breaches.
Centralized management is the feature I like best, resulting in reduced workload and more continuous policy.
Network Security provides us with unified security management across hybrid and cloud as well as on-prem.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has impacted my organization positively by making it very easy to work and offering a more competitive price compared to other vendors.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has positively impacted my organization by providing always-on perimeter security.
Strong network segmentation is my favorite feature that Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) | 2.7% |
| Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall | 1.0% |
| Other | 96.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 132 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 53 |
| Large Enterprise | 142 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Check Point Cloud Firewall, previously known as CloudGuard Network Security, provides advanced threat prevention, centralized management, and VPN capabilities, enabling robust cloud security across various platforms including Azure and AWS.
Check Point Cloud Firewall delivers seamless cloud integration with advanced automated threat prevention and centralized management to enhance security posture. It offers auto-scaling for dynamic environments and a comprehensive policy enforcement framework in hybrid settings. The unified interface streamlines administration across cloud infrastructures, ensuring consistent protection and reducing risk.
What important features does it offer?In manufacturing and conglomerate sectors, Check Point Cloud Firewall is utilized for protecting cloud environments and implementing network segmentation. It supports secure cloud migration on AWS, Azure, and GCP, ensuring compliance, perimeter defense, and traffic inspection, facilitating sophisticated threat prevention strategies.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers robust network protection with features like URL filtering and advanced threat protection, ensuring comprehensive security and operational efficiency across various infrastructures.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall integrates URL filtering and advanced threat protection, including intrusion prevention and DDoS prevention. The centralized management console provides application awareness, strong network segmentation, and SD-WAN capabilities. Its graphical interface enhances user experience, while efficient technical support and seamless integration offer stability and scalability. Companies use it for perimeter security, VPNs, and threat prevention, optimizing performance in diverse sectors.
What are the key features of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is widely implemented in sectors including finance, education, and government, offering security for data centers and managing remote access with IPsec VPN tunnels, SSL VPNs, and site-to-site connectivity. Companies appreciate its use for Unified Threat Management and automatic optimization, ensuring data security and efficient network performance.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.