Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CrossBrowserTesting Logo

CrossBrowserTesting Reviews

Vendor: SmartBear
4.5 out of 5
260 followers
Start review

What is CrossBrowserTesting?

Featured CrossBrowserTesting reviews

CrossBrowserTesting mindshare

As of June 2025, the mindshare of CrossBrowserTesting in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 0.8%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on CrossBrowserTesting reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryFunctional Testing ToolsJun 8, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJun 8, 2025Download
ComparisonCrossBrowserTesting vs Tricentis ToscaJun 8, 2025Download
ComparisonCrossBrowserTesting vs OpenText UFT OneJun 8, 2025Download
ComparisonCrossBrowserTesting vs UiPath Test CloudJun 8, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.119.7%96%110 interviewsAdd to research
BrowserStack4.010.8%100%26 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
5%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Logistics Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Retailer
3%
University
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Hospitality Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Leisure / Travel Company
2%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
 

CrossBrowserTesting reviews

Sort by:
CN
Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of CrossBrowserTesting
Nov 13, 2021
Product version discussed: Latest version
Knowledgeable support, scalable, and stable

Pros

"I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable."

Cons

"We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve."
PeerSpot user
Quality Assurance Specialist at SelectQuote
Verified user of CrossBrowserTesting
Nov 5, 2020
Live testing gives us the ability to identify potential issues on different browsers and devices proving to be a very useful tool.

Pros

"Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data. "

Cons

"Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing."
Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting. Updated June 2025
855,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Web Specialist at Mayo Clinic
Verified user of CrossBrowserTesting
Jul 7, 2020
Static screenshots are the feature most often used, because they are a simple method of detecting problems

Pros

"When developing new pages that have questionable functionality or coding, we will often use CBT to test it in a browser. CBT works with our testing environment and development site."

Cons

"The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default."
PeerSpot user
Manager, Web Development at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of CrossBrowserTesting
Jan 9, 2020
Extensive pre-deployment testing ensures consistency and finds problems before our customers do

Pros

"CrossBrowserTesting allows us to test our site with real-world devices in real-world scenarios and find what we're missing."

Cons

"This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices."
PeerSpot user
Works at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Verified user of CrossBrowserTesting
Sep 26, 2019
A useful tool as it has the capability for functional testing, UI testing, automated testing just on few clicks.
PeerSpot user
Software Quality Assurance Engineer
Verified user of CrossBrowserTesting
May 16, 2019
Saves development time with the early discovery of platform-specific issues

Pros

"Record and Replay is the most used functionality for us, as we can record the test cases and play them on multiple combinations of platforms."

Cons

"It would be useful if we can run the live-testing test cases on multiple platforms at the same time, instead of waiting for one session to finish."
PeerSpot user
Works
Verified user of CrossBrowserTesting
Apr 26, 2019
Saves time and money by offering "real" devices for testing our application, but is sometimes unresponsive

Pros

"This solution helps lower the overhead cost associated with buying multiple devices."

Cons

"I have had quite a few issues trying to use a virtual machine to test our application on."
PeerSpot user
Works at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Verified user of CrossBrowserTesting
Mar 19, 2019
We use it for testing our sites on various desktop browsers and phone environments with different browser versions