Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Wireless Logo

Cisco Wireless Reviews

Vendor: Cisco
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is Cisco Wireless?

Featured Cisco Wireless reviews

Cisco Wireless mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Cisco Wireless in the Wireless LAN category stands at 11.1%, down from 14.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cisco Wireless11.1%
Aruba Wireless16.0%
Ruckus Wireless14.1%
Other58.8%
Wireless LAN

PeerResearch reports based on Cisco Wireless reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWireless LANAug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Wireless vs Aruba WirelessAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Wireless vs Ruckus WirelessAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LANAug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Aruba Wireless4.216.0%86%149 interviewsAdd to research
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points4.45.6%100%23 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business55
Midsize Enterprise34
Large Enterprise52
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business620
Midsize Enterprise344
Large Enterprise1136
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
University
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Retailer
4%
Construction Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Non Profit
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Insurance Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Media Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%

Compare Cisco Wireless with alternative products

Learn more about Cisco Wireless

Cisco Wireless customers

Related questions

 
Cisco Wireless Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Head Of ELV and ICT at Intec Systems Solution Pvt Ltd4.0I implemented Cisco Wireless for the largest Wi-Fi network at the University of Keleniya. Its bridging capability ensures network continuity, and it offers reliability with no errors. Implementation is easy, fulfilling customer requirements, though there could be past component improvements.
Infrastructure Administrator at Aluko & Oyebode4.5I use Cisco Wireless in a large enterprise for its reliable performance and strong controller-based management, despite the high cost. Setup is smooth for experienced users, and support is solid with great backward compatibility and long-term ROI.
System Engineer at DANAT IT FOR BUSINESS4.0I utilize Cisco Wireless for office access points and Wi-Fi in my role as a system integrator. The product is reliable and maintenance-free, and while no immediate improvements are needed, long-term cost reductions would be beneficial.
Supervisor, Technology at Tcps4.5We have about 3,000 mobile devices daily that benefit from Cisco Wireless's seamless handoff. Despite some quirks in Wi-Fi 6, Cisco's flexibility helps manage our budget. We prefer managing our infrastructure directly rather than using vendor platforms.
Production Director at Whitespider4.5We use Cisco Wireless for mobility across various industries, appreciating its robust support for IoT and seamless controller transition. However, improvement in Assurance capabilities is needed. Cisco APs outperform competitors like Juniper, Aruba, and Extreme.
Network Engineer at General Authority OF ZAKAT & TAX5.0I use Cisco Wireless in my company for various devices, and its performance and integration ease are valuable. However, coverage issues and compatibility with newer controllers are drawbacks. We also consider Aruba and prefer Huawei for its lifecycle management and coverage.
Department Leader: Project Leadership Production Compact at SKODA AUTO a.s.4.5I use Cisco Wireless in my company to cover complex spaces and connect devices to ethernet. It integrates well with wired and wireless connections, although it could improve in coverage and become more cost-effective. I have tested other solutions.
SCCM Administrator at Tech Mahindra Limited4.5I work with Cisco Wireless, supporting users and configuring network solutions. It's easy to configure, and I've been familiar with it for almost nine years. However, the interface and integrations could be more intuitive, with automation needed for firmware upgrades.