Which wireless controller has maximum client connectivity and high throughput?

I am working as a Senior Technical Executive at a coaching institute for IIT- JEE, Pre-Medical, Commerce, Law, and Pre-Foundation.

We are evaluating Fortinet, Ruckus, Cisco, and Huawei

Which one of these is the best wireless controller for maximum client connectivity and has high throughput?

Sr. Technical Executive at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees
  • 6
  • 56
PeerSpot user
7 Answers
Director of Technical Services at CTM
Real User
Feb 8, 2021

All are good selections, and this question is difficult to answer without knowing your throughput requirements, as each vendor has multiple models within there series.

Personally I recommend looking at Arista Networks’ cognitive Wifi, where controllers are a thing of the past.

Product comparison that may be of interest to you
C.T.O at Sastra Network Solution Inc. Pvt. Ltd.
Real User
Top 10
Feb 3, 2021

Cisco has maximum client connectivity and high throughput.

Sales Engineer with 51-200 employees
Feb 17, 2020

Ruckus virtual smart zone will be your best bet allowing up to 300k connected devices and 30k access points. furthermore, Ruckus has time and again proven best in speed, throughput in high density environments by independent studies. I have over a decade of working with this product and none of the other competitors can beat the layer 1 connectivity of Ruckus WiFi

Group IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Feb 17, 2020


Every one of the mentioned solutions is good but you need to check the needs which are security since the firms you are working with need protection and tracking of data. For this reason, I recommend:

- if you have FortiGate installed then go for Fortinet Wireless since they can be integrated with the Fortigate without buying a controller and they work perfectly together and you will get the advantage of applying rules to the client himself whether mobile or computer, easily managed & monitored, more visibility over your network and incident notifications.

If the above doesn't apply then you can go with the best one that fits your budget and security needs which for me doesn't fall on the mentioned solution but to go with ARUBA Instant Access Wireless Solution and the reasons are as such:

- Cisco is too much expensive and you got to pay smart support with some complexity in configuration and you need to buy a controller
- Ruckus is good but when you want to have the security you need to buy a controller with licenses and it won't give you the security needed since it is just a wireless solution
- Huawei is not a stable company since it had many ups and downs and they can reach with you to have all the solutions nearly free so that you install their brand.

Whereas Aruba you don't need a controller in the Instant access points and you will get the minimum security with radius integration and what is important a lifetime warranty on the access points.

In addition, if the number of access points increased and you want more detailed management and more advanced configurations, you can buy a controller either on-premises or on-cloud with Aruba.

The above information is based on my experience with all the solutions and their POC.

If you need any more details and consultancy, kindly feel free to contact me.


Technical Consultant at itnet
May 20, 2020

Hi Imad,
Thanks for your input. Do you have any POC data for Cisco and Aruba?
Thanks in advance

Executivo de vendas at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Feb 17, 2020

Boa tarde
As soluções cada solução que você indicou tem pormenores que podem impactar tanto no funcionamento quanto em caso de disaster recovery.
Fortinet: Possui bons access points, aliado às funcionalidades de segurança do próprio UTM, porém será mais um serviço para o appliance gerenciar, e dependendo do que está rodando nele, corre-se o risco de degradar a performance da funcionalidade principal "segurança", por que tambem está gerenciando uma rede wireless, além do fato se houver alguma pane no appliance Fortinet, tanto os itens de segurança quanto a rede wireless irão ficar indisponível. Dê a Cézar o que é de Cézar, deixe a fortinet focada em segurança, que é o que ela faz de melhor.
Ruckus: Excelentes Access points, confiáveis e com alta performance, possui no mínimo 4 opções de gerência, sendo, controlerless Unleashed, appliance virtual, appliance hardware e cloud, ambas as opções não trará prejuizo à performance da rede wireless, porque não há tunelamento de dados para elas, além de possuir várias funções de segurança inerentes à rede wireless. licenças são perpétuas.
Cisco: Excelente access points, porém solução muito cara para aquisição e renovação.
Huawei: Pelo que conheço, tem bons access points, e controladoras virtuais e appliance físico, mas conheço poucas redes com esta solução.
É lógico que uma tem um recurso extra a mais do que a outra, mas considero mera perfumaria, pois o básico para uma rede wireless segura todas atendem.
Eu já atendi a mais de 40 universidades federais no Brasil, todas com Ruckus, e não há reclamação da solução.
Como recomendação pessoal, vá de Ruckus.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless vs. Huawei Wireless and other solutions. Updated: September 2023.
734,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Director of Technical Services at CTM
Real User
Feb 17, 2020

It is all dependent on the size of the controllers in question. Though I would suggest getting a cloud base technology so you are limited by any controller and have much better redundancy. Take a look at Arista Cognitive Wireless

Related Questions
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Nov 30, 2021
See 1 answer
Janet Staver - PeerSpot reviewer
Tech Blogger
Nov 30, 2021
Huawei wireless is a strong and solid product that has a lot of features - and for all that it offers, it happens to be very cost effective. As a wireless solution, it is simple and its user interface is user-friendly. Overall, I have found that Huawei has high performance, provides good coverage, and is reliable. In my experience, the scalability has been good as well, and whenever we have had issues, customer service or technical support has been extremely helpful. I will mention, though, that the initial installation took about six hours because we had to configure the controller, and although it was not difficult, it did involve a technical team of three engineers to set it up. There are some things that I feel could be improved. The manageability could be better, and I have also had some issues with bugs and instability. I would also hope that in the near future sometime, they would add network access control features. In comparison to Huawei wireless, D-Link is competitive in price. In my research, I have found that it is easy to manage and also easy to install. Another advantage of D-Link is that it includes wireless, switching, and static wiring, which is important if your organization needs to implement with other OEMs, making it a complete solution. I felt that it had limited advanced features for distributing bandwidth. While I think D-Link is a good product and is affordable, I think it needs to get up to speed with other vendors and there is a lot of room for improvement. It is also important to know that the solution does not have hotspots. Conclusion: I would choose Huawei’s wireless solution over D-Link because I think the solution offers good value for the price, and I also like the speed and mobility it offers, which I find to be quite impressive.
Vinny Govender - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Applications Specialist at bioMérieux
Jul 26, 2022
Hi, I'm working as a Technical Applications Specialist at a Pharma/Biotech company with 10000+ employees. I'm researching to purchase a high-performance Wireless LAN device. Which one of the following products would you recommend: Ubiquiti Unifi Aruba Wireless  Ruckus Wireless Huawei Wireless Thank you in advance!
2 out of 9 answers
IT Admin at a educational organization with 51-200 employees
Nov 15, 2021
Hi, You can purchase WiFi access points from any of the above vendors. But it must be a commercial access point as in AP a few connect to the limited devices and a few can connect large devices with a single AP. It will totally depend on your work environment and access point signals covering the area. In the hall, AP can cover a large area but there is a concrete wall between two rooms or a corridor then it can down the signal to 50 DBM. So, when deciding on a WIFI/AP keep all these things in mind.
Partner / Owner at Bimel Elektronik Mamuller Paz. Ltd.
Nov 15, 2021
If you want high performance and stability, you should definitely go with Ruckus Wireless.  Ruckus Wireless APs have: - Adaptive antenna technology (called BeamFlex) This technology analyzes different paths to reach the client and electronically turns itself to a directional antenna, choosing the path that gives the best performance to reach each specific client. If the client is mobile or if the environment changes (such as a warehouse) the selection of paths/direction also changes instantly. Transmitting in a directional way allows a good Signal-to-Noise Ratio and also causes less interference for other nearby APs outside the path of the directional transmission. - ChannelFly technology This technology chooses the best channel based on performance rather than background scanning for noise. - Polarization Diversity This technology allows the clients not to lose signal strength when held at different angles (important for mobile devices such as tablets and telephones). - Better receive sensitivity compared to the competitors All these features make Ruckus Wireless a better choice than any other competitor (better performance, better coverage area, more stable and surprise-free communication especially in not so easy conditions such as noise, too many clients, too much traffic).
it_user375078 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Engineer/Mobility Specialist at CCSI - Contemporary Computer Services, Inc.
Real User
Product Comparisons
Download Free Report
Download our FREE report comparing Cisco Wireless and Huawei Wireless based on reviews, features, and more! Updated: September 2023.
734,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.