We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Aruba Instant vs Cisco Wireless comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aruba Instant Logo
7,228 views|5,969 comparisons
Cisco Wireless Logo
26,030 views|23,140 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant vs. Cisco Wireless and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The integration with ClearPass is the most valuable feature.""The products offer a lot of flexibility. Almost everything can be configured. It works very well for providing remote services.""The quick setup and automatic code embedded in one access point is really useful.""The access it grants to wifi is the solution's most valuable feature."

More Aruba Instant Pros →

"Some of the valuable features of this solution are security, the controller is simple to configure, devices are easy to install, and we use the software to administrate all the APs.""We were able to utilize the elements of the core and provide a solution to our customers similar to that of Cisco Meraki.""Cisco Wireless is scalable.""Cisco has good support services.""Cisco Wireless is easy to use.""It is good, and it works.""It's very easy to configure the access points.""The support is very good. Technical support is very helpful."

More Cisco Wireless Pros →

Cons
"Doesn't support enough access points in one cluster.""The meshing could use improvement but aside from that nothing else really needs improvement.""The reach of the solution could be improved. It could be a bit stronger.""The management component is difficult to understand and not very user-friendly which increases deployment time."

More Aruba Instant Cons →

"It requires a few tweaks in order to stabilize it. Its portal is complex. Cisco solutions are complex in general.""Before deploying a wireless solution, you have to read and plan every role, every windows system, put in your access point, and then make the audit. This solution is not the best one to do this. We use another solution that is called Eko. In the future, if this solution could have better auditing capabilities it would be better.""Their software's really clunky.""Older versions used to be hard to deploy. The latest OS, however, has made things a lot easier. While deployment is much better, it could always be even easier.""There are some features I would like to have in Cisco Wireless, such as Telemetry and other IoT. However, they are available in the new version of the solution.""We've recently had hardware issues which have caused us some problems.""Controllers could be improved.""It's end-of-life, it will be end-of-support in the next two years. The APs are also end-of-life."

More Cisco Wireless Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing cost is somewhere around $20,000."
  • More Aruba Instant Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Cost is one of the reasons why we are switching to Aruba. Aruba is significantly lower than Cisco in price. We do the licensing on a three-year basis. Cisco makes licensing very difficult."
  • "The price of this product is reasonable."
  • "This is an expensive product."
  • "The product could be priced better."
  • "Cisco Wireless is a little bit expensive when compared to other solutions."
  • "The price is a little high. However, you get what you pay for. The quality of the product is high, you will find it is worth the money. There is some additional cost, for example, customer support."
  • "It's expensive because a lot of the controls come with licenses."
  • "This solution is expensive, but you get value for your money."
  • More Cisco Wireless Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
    566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    We researched Ubiquiti and Aruba when looking for a WLAN solution. Ubiquiti offers good WLAN access both indoors and outdoors. It provides an enterprise-level WIFI while remaining cost-effective… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helped… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Ruckus Wireless offers users the benefit of being both easy to set up and get running as well as being very user friendly. This user-friendly quality also renders it easy to learn how to use and… more »
    Top Answer: 
    On the most basic level, Cisco Wireless can offer a rather straightforward initial setup. In the span of about three hours, the basic framework can be set up. Step-by-step instructions are available… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 26 in Wireless LAN
    Views
    7,228
    Comparisons
    5,969
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    475
    Rating
    8.5
    2nd
    out of 26 in Wireless LAN
    Views
    26,030
    Comparisons
    23,140
    Reviews
    59
    Average Words per Review
    461
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cisco WLAN Controller
    Learn More
    Overview

    Aruba Instant delivers the only controllerless Wi-Fi solution that is easy to set-up, and loaded with security and smarts needed to accelerate your business without breaking your budget.

    With Cisco Wireless you will successfully plan, deploy, monitor, troubleshoot, and report on indoor and outdoor wireless networks - all from a centralized location.
    Offer
    Learn more about Aruba Instant
    Learn more about Cisco Wireless
    Sample Customers
    Purdue University, Orlando Magic, Brussels Airport Company, Molecaten Holiday Parks
    Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider36%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government6%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government8%
    Educational Organization7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider35%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government6%
    Educational Organization5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise36%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant vs. Cisco Wireless and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aruba Instant is ranked 11th in Wireless LAN with 4 reviews while Cisco Wireless is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 71 reviews. Aruba Instant is rated 8.0, while Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Instant writes "Offers a lot of flexibility, almost everything can be configured". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Robust with a good level of performance and very helpful technical support". Aruba Instant is most compared with Ubiquiti WLAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Wireless and Fortinet FortiWLM, whereas Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ubiquiti WLAN and Fortinet FortiWLM. See our Aruba Instant vs. Cisco Wireless report.

    See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

    We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.