Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Reviews

Some users report uncertain ROI, while others highlight reduced operational costs making ROI significantly faster than from other brands. Several mention moderate ROI but value the firewall's ransomware protection and ease of management. Initial costs are seen as high but worth it. However, some find limited ROI compared to other options and emphasize costliness. There is acknowledgment of the firewall's benefits being a primary condition for deployment in their organizations.

Enterprise buyers considering Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center find its pricing structure generally expensive, with costs for individual features like malware and URL protection. Flexible licensing options allow customization based on specific needs, offering both hardware and virtual options. Many users note that technical support incurs additional annual fees. Some perceive its cost as mid-range or reasonable compared to competitive offerings. Overall, the solution frequently receives a price rating around six to eight out of ten.

• "The product pricing is reasonable and falls in the mid-range."
• "My license offers all the protection, like malware protection, VPN protection, IDS, IPS, and endpoint protection."
• "As for pricing, the tool is expensive for us. I'd rate it eight out of ten on a scale where ten is the most expensive."

Organizations primarily use Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center for managing and securing network infrastructure. It serves as a firewall for perimeter protection, VPN, malware detection, application visibility, and network segmentation. Users leverage it for managing firewalls, maintaining security layers, controlling access, reporting, and logging. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center also supports anti-malware, antivirus, intrusion prevention, and integration with other security systems like Splunk. It provides control over routing policies and traffic segmentation in enterprise environments.

Many users find Cisco technical support helpful and responsive, rating it eight out of ten. They praise its extensive knowledge base and dedicated teams in areas like Pakistan. However, some experience slow response times or inadequate emergency support. Users in Iran cannot access due to sanctions. With inconsistent satisfaction levels, some rate Cisco support as high as ten, deeming them the most supportive, while others rate it lower due to recent response delays.

Users describe Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center's initial setup as varying in complexity. Some find it straightforward, particularly those with Cisco experience, while others face challenges. Deployment times range from hours to weeks, depending on factors like environment and team size. Experience with Cisco tools and proper documentation aids in ease, yet additional expertise may be needed for advanced tasks. Integration into networks, especially in Cisco ecosystems, tends to be manageable.

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is widely regarded for its scalability. Many organizations note its flexibility, with some handling thousands of users efficiently. Multiple companies highlight its ability to accommodate growth, offering features that easily integrate new users and licenses. No scalability issues are reported, and some users rate it highly in this aspect. The platform can adapt to extensive network demands, making it suitable for both small and large-scale implementations.

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is highly stable, with most users rating its stability between seven and ten out of ten. Users appreciate its reliability, absence of significant bugs, and strong performance. While some issues occur, such as occasional high CPU load or bugs resolved in recent updates, these are typically addressed with help from technical support. Conducting pilot tests prior to deployment helps ensure optimal stability, especially when managing complex configurations.