We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution has a great UI and a policy deployment mechanism, and all the configuration is easily manageable for the firewalls."
"The applied policy inside the firewall is good."
"I like its system management and filtering options as a layer seven firewall."
"One of the most valuable features of Cisco Secure Firewalls is their seamless integration with other Cisco products."
"The most valuable feature of the Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is the UTM."
"The solution is quite scalable."
"Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is scalable."
"The APIs are the most valuable feature of this solution, as they facilitate integration with ServiceNow and other solutions."
"The most valuable feature is alerting, which lets me know when someone has made a change."
"We find it to be flexible. If we have a change that needs to be done, it will go ahead and do it for all our devices, regardless of the manufacturer that we have associated with it."
"I don't think that we were ever slow, but we can now say that changes are completed within twenty-four hours."
"This has helped us to better clean up and audit changes to the firewall policy."
"It's hard to pick the most valuable feature. All of them are valuable, they're all critical for us... ChangeTrack obviously has a lot of very good features, like the risk analysis, the USP, and the Policy Browser."
"Tufin allows our say junior guys to learn how to view policies. It gives them a tool that will help them consolidate and optimize."
"The most valuable features are the Security Risks and Best Practices reporting/Rule base cleanup."
"The performance of the Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center could be improved."
"The interface is an area that could be improved."
"Areas for improvement include pricing points and the range of products available at any given time."
"Cisco Firepower has been effective in solving various problems, but it could be improved by making it simpler and more user-friendly like Fortinet."
"The solution should improve the user interface."
"Cisco firewalls use old ESR or a Linux system, and there are problems with encryption. When we switch on encryption, the throughput goes down."
"Improving the product by incorporating SD-WAN functionality would be highly beneficial, especially for remote offices with limited server and Internet availability."
"The IOS and the deploy option could be improved."
"I would like to see API access into every aspect of Tufin."
"I would rate their reports as a four out of ten. I don't like the way that they are shown. It is too hard to export and send them to our clients."
"At least in our environment, the dynamic learning of the topology needs improvement."
"I would like the ability to export information in other formats including PDF, HTML, or Excel."
"I feel that the user interface is a bit dated."
"We would like Tufin to have interoperability with Juniper products, along with official support."
"We want to have the ability for a ticket requester to add somebody, or to give somebody view rights to their ticket."
"Their pricing can be better. It is not very transparent."
More Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is ranked 7th in Firewall Security Management with 19 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 180 reviews. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is rated 8.0, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center writes "A stable and reasonably priced product that protects organizations from malware". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, FireMon Security Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco Defense Orchestrator, whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer. See our Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
