Tufin Orchestration Suite and Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center both compete in the network security and firewall management category. Tufin appears to have an advantage in automation and policy optimization, while Cisco is favored for its robust security features and integration with other Cisco products.
Features: Tufin Orchestration Suite uses modules like SecureTrack and SecureChange for efficient firewall management across multiple vendors with automation and extensive analysis. It is renowned for change tracking and streamlined policy optimization. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center offers robust security features such as intrusion prevention, application visibility, and centralized management that readily integrate with other Cisco products.
Room for Improvement: Tufin users have cited integration challenges and a complex interface, with suggestions for better cloud support and enhanced reporting features. The Cisco platform is noted for performance challenges and costly additional features, prompting calls for improved cost-effectiveness and simpler user interfaces.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tufin Orchestration Suite offers both on-premises and cloud deployment options, providing flexibility but indicating a need for enhanced cloud integration. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is mostly on-premises with a support team praised for responsiveness, though support costs are high. Tufin's support team is recognized for technical expertise.
Pricing and ROI: Tufin Orchestration Suite, while perceived as expensive, delivers substantial ROI through automation and time savings in managing firewall changes. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center also carries a high price tag but offers flexible licensing options that benefit businesses heavily invested in Cisco products, providing a reasonable ROI through streamlined integration and robust network security management.
There are a lot of solutions which can provide the same features.
The Orchestration Suite saves time when implementing rules.
I rate the technical support from Cisco as ten out of ten.
In recent years, they have stopped providing specialized engineering support.
The support team is effective; they connect to the network quickly and help resolve any issues that arise.
The team is eager to help in fixing issues.
For the 3000 new series and the 4000, we can make a cluster.
I would rate scalability capabilities as ten out of ten.
Now Cisco has published the 120 series and the 1100 series, which support SD-WAN features in the firewall.
I remember version 6.4 had an integration with Eddie, allowing me to define a policy according to my users, however, the latest version, lacks this integration.
The analytics features of Tufin Orchestration Suite are challenging to use and require technical expertise, which is a concern as there is not much knowledge in this field in Thailand.
Issues can arise in larger enterprises, particularly concerning policy-based forwarding and NAT traffic.
The design needs improvement, particularly in recognizing target devices and target files.
I find the pricing for Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center to be very reasonable, as they offer the license for both virtual and hardware options.
FireMon and Skybox are considered more cost-effective.
The pricing of Orchestration Suite is high, which is a point for improvement.
Tufin and AlgoSec are at the same level in terms of pricing.
I consider Talos feedback that Cisco provides as free threat intelligence to be the most valuable for me and for the operation of the security policy in my organization.
It provides full visibility of my devices, whether I have six or ten devices.
AlgoSec adds more value with its vulnerability control, which benefits organizations by reducing expenses associated with audits.
New employees can quickly grasp the various IPs, devices, and the network's logical and physical layout within a short period.
It offers automation capabilities that are very helpful, especially for network security orchestration and applying policies.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Tufin Orchestration Suite | 21.0% |
| Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center | 1.6% |
| Other | 77.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 152 |
The Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is the administrative nerve center for select Cisco security products running on multiple platforms. It provides unified management of Cisco Secure Firewalls with Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) software for port and protocol control, application control, IPS, URL filtering, and malware protection functions. Firewall Management Center is the centralized event and policy manager for:
● Cisco Secure Firewall with the Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) OS
● Cisco ASA with FirePOWER Services
● Cisco Secure IPS (Firepower Next-Gen IPS / NGIPS)
● Cisco FirePOWER Threat Defense for ISR
● Cisco Malware Defense (AMP)
Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
