Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center are key players in the network security category. Fortinet seems to have the upper hand in deployment flexibility and cost-effectiveness, while Cisco leads with its comprehensive security features.
Features: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud stands out for its ease of use, stability, and effective security incident management. It offers strong SD-WAN capabilities and centralized management. Users appreciate its integration with other Fortinet products. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center excels in security features with IPS, IDS, and advanced threat protection. It seamlessly integrates with other Cisco products and enhances application visibility.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud could improve in UX, reporting, and integrating advanced features such as SIEM. Users note data retention challenges and configuration complexity. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center faces criticism for complex setup, high pricing, and licensing issues. Improvements are needed for dashboard interfaces and management tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers diverse deployment models across on-premises, public, hybrid, and private clouds, providing flexibility for various organizations. Its technical support is generally satisfactory but could improve in responsiveness. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is primarily on-premises with limited cloud flexibility. Although reliable, Cisco's technical support can be slow and complex at times.
Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is regarded as cost-effective with competitive pricing, particularly against alternatives like Palo Alto, and provides significant ROI in network security management. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is considered expensive due to recurring licensing fees but offers flexible licensing models that justify the investment for users prioritizing comprehensive security features.
There are a lot of solutions which can provide the same features.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud has improved our clients' cost savings and efficiency.
The cloud aspect provides flexibility in disaster recovery and cost management.
In terms of cost savings or efficiency in our company's IT network management, I would say that the tool is very efficient because we have no problems with it at all.
I rate the technical support from Cisco as ten out of ten.
I have received good support from FortiGate, and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
Technically, the support team is good, and they have very good relations with users and even partners.
The team is responsive, and most cases are handled promptly.
I would rate scalability capabilities as ten out of ten.
For the 3000 new series and the 4000, we can make a cluster.
We plan to deploy VoIP in the future and aim to leverage more VoIP capabilities for our remote operations.
I rate the product's scalability a ten out of ten.
It's very easy to add new devices and push the configuration templates.
We weren't bothered even by a single incident for the past three years.
But in three or four years, I only had problems logging in three times.
It is a very stable solution.
I remember version 6.4 had an integration with Eddie, allowing me to define a policy according to my users, however, the latest version, lacks this integration.
Now Cisco has published the 120 series and the 1100 series, which support SD-WAN features in the firewall.
There's a need to improve or invest more in an application that can follow users wherever they go.
The Linux version currently lacks some of the latest features, notably in the IPv6 tool stack, which is available for Windows clients.
It would be advantageous if it were more cost-effective.
I find the pricing for Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center to be very reasonable, as they offer the license for both virtual and hardware options.
There are no additional costs.
Therefore, the cost-benefit is quite significant.
You shouldn't prioritize cheapness over security or other poor technology.
I consider Talos feedback that Cisco provides as free threat intelligence to be the most valuable for me and for the operation of the security policy in my organization.
It provides full visibility of my devices, whether I have six or ten devices.
The solution's most valuable feature is log reporting.
The solution's most valuable feature is its ease of use.
The most valuable feature is its user-friendly interface - even those unfamiliar with firewalls can easily manage it.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiGate Cloud | 4.5% |
| Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center | 1.6% |
| Other | 93.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 50 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
The Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is the administrative nerve center for select Cisco security products running on multiple platforms. It provides unified management of Cisco Secure Firewalls with Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) software for port and protocol control, application control, IPS, URL filtering, and malware protection functions. Firewall Management Center is the centralized event and policy manager for:
● Cisco Secure Firewall with the Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) OS
● Cisco ASA with FirePOWER Services
● Cisco Secure IPS (Firepower Next-Gen IPS / NGIPS)
● Cisco FirePOWER Threat Defense for ISR
● Cisco Malware Defense (AMP)
FortiCloud can help with your wireless and security challenges in a number of ways. Our solution addresses common IT difficulties including time-consuming provisioning, high investment costs, complex management, vulnerability to advanced threats, and the need to easily scale with growth.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
