Cisco IOS SSL VPN Reviews

I use the solution in my company as it serves as a VPN solution for handling the proxies.

The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.

There is a need to increase the features of the product so that it can provide users with full access to the network. It would be good if the product were able to provide users with specific application access. In our company, we open all of our networks for users, but we can't open a specific application network or separate applications with VPN.

The product has some connectivity issues, making it an area where improvements are required.

We use the solution for hospitality projects. We use a network infrastructure to deliver multicast streams for IPTV.

The multicast feature is useful for us. It's the only feature that is necessary for us on the network.

It provides a secure way for remote users to connect to the corporate network without the need for additional client software.

With a secure remote access solution, our administrators can efficiently manage data center tasks from anywhere. The value for money in this scenario is evident when considering the time-sensitive nature of data center maintenance. Having secure remote access minimizes downtime and the associated costs compared to the alternative of physically bringing in administrators during an outage.

The people who implement the solution are from the operations team in our company. My team is called the planning and solution team in our company, which looks after the initial planning and designing of deployment, and then later on, the deployment is taken care of by a different team.

Cisco IOS SSL VPN usefulness varies according to purposes and depends on your solution. Cisco IOS SSL VPN can be useful for cases involving site-to-site VPN, client-to-site VPN, or single access office network.

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the solution works fine, but I can't comment more since I am not from the operations team, because of which I cannot provide data based on what the end user prefers.

I use Cisco IOS SSL VPN to work from home remotely.

The split panel functionality is much better in the Cisco IOS SSL VPN than in the Aruba VPN.

I use Cisco IOS SSL VPN in my company. Though it is a complex product, it is flexible and shares similarities with one of the products I have experience with, so in general, I feel it is a good solution. The tool is very easy and user-friendly to use.

In our company, we saw that clients who use VPNs require almost the same or common functionalities from any product. The use cases are more related to the location of the clients because Cisco is a vendor that serves mostly clients or customers in the USA. In the European market, our company uses more of Fortinet. Our company does many Cisco installations in the USA.

The most valuable features of the solution are not something that the VPN clients of my company simply experience. I appreciate that with Cisco, if you need some documentation, solution, or supply, there are many people who can provide some information.

My company uses the product to get Cisco AnyConnect client to connect to our internal network.

The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and the fact that you can apply multi-factor authentication on it.