

Cisco IOS SSL VPN and Check Point Remote Access VPN compete in the secure remote access category, with each offering distinct advantages. Cisco is often favored for its ease of use, stability, and comprehensive security, while Check Point is appreciated for its integration capabilities within existing infrastructures.
Features: Cisco IOS SSL VPN offers robust encryption, versatile remote access configurations, and customizable web portals. Its management capabilities, multi-factor authentication, and seamless connectivity are valuable features. Check Point Remote Access VPN includes seamless integration with Active Directory, high security through multi-factor authentication, and centralized management of VPN activities, alongside clientless SSL VPN access and granular control over network access.
Room for Improvement: Cisco IOS SSL VPN could improve its RADIUS-based user mapping, ASA configuration complexity, pricing model flexibility, and compatibility with Windows Internet Explorer. Check Point Remote Access VPN needs enhancements in policy configuration for multi-user scenarios, a better user interface, and increased Linux system support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco IOS SSL VPN is primarily deployed on-premises, supporting hybrid cloud environments and provides reliable technical support. Check Point Remote Access VPN offers flexible deployment options, including hybrid, private, and public clouds, with a straightforward setup process and strong technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco IOS SSL VPN is costly but offers a high return on investment due to its comprehensive security and networking package, although it may not be as price-competitive as Fortinet. Check Point Remote Access VPN is moderately priced with a clear ROI, providing more cost-effective options compared to some alternatives, though initial setup costs can be high.
It reduces the dependency on being physically present in the office and enhances the overall user experience, saving time and maintaining security.
I have seen a return on investment with fewer employees needed and time saved.
It has reduced the number of support tickets related to remote access by about 30%, saving our IT team significant time.
They are really helpful, and whenever we face any technical or configuration issues, we reach out to them, and they help us resolve the issues as soon as possible.
Contacting the Technical Assistance Centers (TACs) initially can be difficult, but once I get in touch with the TAC team, it is easy to solve problems.
The customer support for Check Point Remote Access VPN has been very helpful and responsive whenever we needed assistance.
We contact support regularly, especially for deployments, and they are very responsive.
When Cisco first took over, it was a bit more difficult to get support, but they now integrate it without differentiating the support for Linksys versus full-blown Cisco switches.
I don't see that we can hit any kind of roof in our organization.
The scalability of Check Point Remote Access VPN is good as it supports a large number of remote users simultaneously.
Our organization finds Check Point Remote Access VPN handles increased numbers of remote users smoothly without performance issues.
It integrates well with Cisco's ecosystem, providing flexibility and options to connect to diverse environments.
Otherwise, the experience and stability are outstanding.
I have not faced any issue, downtime, or latency with Check Point Remote Access VPN.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is very stable.
Linksys can be fairly stable for easy environments, but in more complex network environments, Cisco is definitely a lot more stable.
Cisco IOS SSL VPN is extremely stable.
The response time is much worse, with the first layer of support lacking sufficient knowledge on how to troubleshoot issues.
Optimizing handshake speed and reducing reconnection delays would improve the user experience, particularly for mobile and hybrid workers.
Deploying these solutions requires higher technical expertise than other solutions.
There have been issues with operating systems where newer updates cause problems with backward compatibility.
I believe Cisco could support easier configuration and having tools that allow for easier management and configuration.
I'm getting the hardware at a very reasonable cost that fits my budget.
It is competitively priced, and we have chosen it for its market leadership in the firewall space.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing are straightforward, though the setup is a bit expensive.
For more than one hundred users, it costs about $60 per seat.
The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
Check Point Remote Access VPN has positively impacted my organization by improving productivity and given us a workaround in times of downtime.
Check Point Remote Access VPN has impacted my organization positively by providing better security and ensuring our data is safe within the entity.
The solution is also very scalable, offering up to one hundred licenses for free, and can integrate well with Cisco's ecosystem, such as Cisco ISE and NAC.
Configuring QoS on Linksys is pretty easy, especially compared to Cisco QoS, which I am certified in, as it helps ensure that the bandwidth for voice or other applications doesn't bleed over into the data links.
The valuable features of Cisco IOS SSL VPN are the ease of use and the speed.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point Remote Access VPN | 3.3% |
| Cisco IOS SSL VPN | 2.0% |
| Other | 94.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 54 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 31 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Remote secure access VPN is a solution that provides users with remote access to an organization’s network. The host may have VPN client software loaded or use a web-based client. The solution leverages security features like multi-factor authentication, endpoint scanning, and encryption of all data in motion.
Check Point Remote Access VPN provides individuals with protected and efficient access to a company network from anywhere. This strategy fosters collaboration and connectivity between distributed teams and offices.
Features of Check Point Remote Access VPN
Key features of the secure remote access VPN include:
The system enforces endpoint security with endpoint compliance. It monitors and verifies the security status of each endpoint and reports back to the Security Gateway. The gateway, in turn, checks the compliance level and directs the connectivity to the right resources.
Users can deploy the Remote Access VPN in one of three ways:
Remote Access VPN is centrally managed. The centralized console enables management and enforcement of policies with a single log-in.
The Remote Access VPN has a web portal that users can use to connect securely to corporate applications, such as web-based resources, file-sharing, and email. Administrators can customize the web portal to match the brand identity.
Remote Access VPN offers two choices for remote access:
The authentication features include password management, RADIUS challenge/response, CAPI software, and hardware tokens. P12 certificates, and SecurID.
The system establishes a VPN tunnel on demand. It also re-arranges connections when roaming. The tunnel can automatically tear down when the user is on the corporate LAN.
There are several connection features, such as Hotspot detection, office mode IP, split tunneling, and automatic fallback to HTTPS.
Benefits of Check Point Remote Access VPN
One of the key advantages of Remote Access VPN is that it provides remote workers with a secure way to connect to a corporate network from any device, including their personal devices. The data encryption in transit enables them to securely access the resources they need for their tasks.
It also provides IT support and technicians with a faster way to troubleshoot software issues. In the case of a ticket, IT doesn’t need to go to the server location to fix the problem but can troubleshoot it remotely.
A remote secure access VPN is also an affordable alternative for small and medium-sized businesses, without requiring expensive infrastructure.
Reviews from Real Users
A Global IT Network and Security Service Senior Specialist at a manufacturing company who uses Check Point Remote Access VPN says, "I found the MEP feature the most valuable. This has improved users' latency allowing the users to connect to the nearest Azure Check Point VM."
"Organizations that already use the Check Point NGFW Solution do not require any additional hardware, which makes the implementation straightforward and reduces the time to go live," explains Basil D., Senior Manager at a financial services firm.
Manuel B., a Voice and data infrastructure specialist at a tech services company, says that "The IPSec VPN, Mobile Access, and Identity Awareness are three of the blades with which we have been working with since the pandemic. This has given us great mobility, making our network more dynamic."
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.