Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs Cisco IOS SSL VPN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point VPN enhances remote work, offering stability, security, and financial gains of 40% to over 100% for companies.
Sentiment score
7.7
Cisco IOS SSL VPN offers strong security with high ROI, easy installation, minimal resource impact, and positive user feedback.
It reduces the dependency on being physically present in the office and enhances the overall user experience, saving time and maintaining security.
In this case, everything is pre-inbuilt, allowing me to easily create new users and share their details so they can connect to Check Point VPN and access internal servers.
Since implementing Check Point Remote Access VPN, I have seen a return on investment as it saves me money and allows users to easily access internal resources from home.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.1
Customer service is generally praised, but technical support experiences mixed reviews with some delays and intermediary issues.
Sentiment score
7.7
Cisco IOS SSL VPN is praised for its responsive, skilled customer support and clear documentation, reducing direct contact needs.
Contacting the Technical Assistance Centers (TACs) initially can be difficult, but once I get in touch with the TAC team, it is easy to solve problems.
The timing of technical support does not always align with our working hours.
While the support team is generally good, it takes at least three to four days to address ticket issues.
When Cisco first took over, it was a bit more difficult to get support, but they now integrate it without differentiating the support for Linksys versus full-blown Cisco switches.
We contact support regularly, especially for deployments, and they are very responsive.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Check Point Remote Access VPN is scalable for diverse deployments but may struggle with connection stability at higher capacities.
Sentiment score
7.8
Cisco IOS SSL VPN is scalable and integrates well with Cisco's ecosystem but may need improvements in pricing and licensing.
Currently, 130 users can connect simultaneously, and it is very reliable and efficient.
I feel confident that Check Point Remote Access VPN can scale effectively if our organization grows, as it can handle additional users and traffic.
It integrates well with Cisco's ecosystem, providing flexibility and options to connect to diverse environments.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable with rare issues, improved reliability, and minor connectivity challenges during updates.
Sentiment score
8.0
Cisco IOS SSL VPN is highly rated for stability but can experience intermittent issues and requires frequent updates.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable and has been reliable for my users.
Linksys can be fairly stable for easy environments, but in more complex network environments, Cisco is definitely a lot more stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point VPN needs easier deployment, better compatibility, simplified interface, scalability improvements, and features like multi-factor authentication.
Cisco IOS SSL VPN needs better integration, usability, compatibility, language support, and simplified licensing to enhance user experience.
Check Point Remote Access VPN can be improved by having more granular options to steer traffic, like easier configurations for split tunneling, which is currently complex.
Check Point Remote Access VPN could improve by automatically switching between my two ISPs when one goes down.
Deploying these solutions requires higher technical expertise than other solutions.
There have been issues with operating systems where newer updates cause problems with backward compatibility.
I believe Cisco could support easier configuration and having tools that allow for easier management and configuration.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Remote Access VPN offers competitive pricing, cost-effective subscriptions, and comprehensive features, despite potentially high initial setup costs.
Cisco IOS SSL VPN is expensive but valued by enterprises; pricing is $60 per seat for over 100 users.
The pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Check Point Remote Access VPN are a bit low compared to my previous solution.
It is competitively priced, and we have chosen it for its market leadership in the firewall space.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing are straightforward, though the setup is a bit expensive.
For more than one hundred users, it costs about $60 per seat.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Remote Access VPN provides secure, easy connectivity with features like multi-factor authentication, encryption, and comprehensive threat prevention.
Cisco IOS SSL VPN offers strong encryption, reliable connectivity, seamless integration, multi-factor authentication, and practical management for secure remote access.
The end-to-end endpoint security provided by Check Point Remote Access VPN impacts our organization by ensuring compliance and enhancing security.
The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
We don't know what vulnerabilities exist in outside networks, so when they connect to Check Point Remote Access VPN, they enter the internal network where traffic is monitored by my firewall, which provides comprehensive threat protection and prevents users from connecting to malware.
The solution is also very scalable, offering up to one hundred licenses for free, and can integrate well with Cisco's ecosystem, such as Cisco ISE and NAC.
Configuring QoS on Linksys is pretty easy, especially compared to Cisco QoS, which I am certified in, as it helps ensure that the bandwidth for voice or other applications doesn't bleed over into the data links.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Remote Access VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
73
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (7th)
Cisco IOS SSL VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
SSL VPN (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Check Point Remote Access VPN is 3.9%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco IOS SSL VPN is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
 

Featured Reviews

NareshKumar9 - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable remote access boosts productivity and connectivity for home-based users
In my opinion, the best feature that Check Point Remote Access VPN offers is its reliability, as there has been no downtime till now. The reliability of Check Point Remote Access VPN has positively impacted my daily operations by reducing my support tickets, particularly when users face connection issues due to ISP downtimes. Check Point Remote Access VPN has positively impacted my organization by providing users access to the internal network, allowing us to capture all activities through our network. The visibility offered by Check Point Remote Access VPN has benefited my organization as it detects unauthorized access attempts, immediately alerting me via a pop-up for any threat protection issues.
Rupesh Kolhapurkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers easy setup phase but needs to improve connectivity
For our company's remote workforce connectivity, the tool was very useful during the COVID-19 situation. In general, the VPN functionality offered by the product was very useful during the COVID-19 situation. In terms of the product's ability to secure third-party access, the tool works very well. The most valuable feature of the product in terms of network security stems from the fact that the tool provides access to the whole network, and even if users give access to some special applications, it is still really helpful. The clientless access feature is not available for clients. My company installed the product for its clients. If the product offers a clientless access feature, then it is okay and can be very helpful for our company. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. Cisco IOS SSL VPN is a reliable product. The product is very helpful for a work-from-home setup as the tool can be used to access our company's internal network, which Falls outside the network of our organization. I rate the tool a seven to eight out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
One area that could be improved is the complexity of setting up Check Point Remote Access VPN, particularly with features like multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and identity awareness. D...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
We are resellers of Check Point products in our country, and our customers use Check Point Remote Access VPN to keep their organization data clean and safe when users access remotely through the cl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco IOS SSL VPN?
The pricing for Cisco IOS SSL VPN is based on per user. For more than one hundred users, it costs about $60 per seat.
What needs improvement with Cisco IOS SSL VPN?
It's hard for me to say how Linksys could be improved. I can't think of any specific improvements needed. I believe Cisco could support easier configuration and having tools that allow for easier m...
 

Also Known As

Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
Cisco SSL VPN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
MST Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Cisco IOS SSL VPN and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.