Cisco IOS SSL VPN and Perimeter 81 are two prominent solutions in the SSL VPN market. Perimeter 81 often seems to have the upper hand due to its user-centric design and modern approach.
Features: Cisco IOS SSL VPN has strong security features, high configurability, and extensive options. Perimeter 81 offers ease of use, seamless integration with multiple platforms, and an innovative, user-friendly interface.
Room for Improvement: Cisco IOS SSL VPN users suggest a need for a more intuitive design, simplified management, and increased usability. Perimeter 81 users desire advanced features, enhanced security options, and improvements in consistency and connectivity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco IOS SSL VPN requires intensive setup and has effective but slow customer service. Perimeter 81 offers swift deployment and fast, responsive customer service, making it ideal for teams with minimal setup complexity.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco IOS SSL VPN involves higher setup costs with appreciated yet not immediate ROI. Perimeter 81 provides competitive pricing and clear, immediate ROI due to its simplicity and efficiency, attracting budget-conscious businesses.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
After updating firmware, data utilization was visible for a few days before collapsing again.
We contact support regularly, especially for deployments, and they are very responsive.
When Cisco first took over, it was a bit more difficult to get support, but they now integrate it without differentiating the support for Linksys versus full-blown Cisco switches.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
The scalability of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is good, and I can add more users and devices easily as my organization grows.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
It integrates well with Cisco's ecosystem, providing flexibility and options to connect to diverse environments.
Even the support team does not have a proper solution for this issue.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Linksys can be fairly stable for easy environments, but in more complex network environments, Cisco is definitely a lot more stable.
An example of when the support cycle took longer than expected was when I had a ticket open for nearly six to seven months regarding a simple issue.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
There have been issues with operating systems where newer updates cause problems with backward compatibility.
I believe Cisco could support easier configuration and having tools that allow for easier management and configuration.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
It is a bit expensive.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is that it is a rental service, but I find it satisfactory.
For more than one hundred users, it costs about $60 per seat.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The best key features of Harmony are stabilization, private access, and Internet access.
The solution is also very scalable, offering up to one hundred licenses for free, and can integrate well with Cisco's ecosystem, such as Cisco ISE and NAC.
Configuring QoS on Linksys is pretty easy, especially compared to Cisco QoS, which I am certified in, as it helps ensure that the bandwidth for voice or other applications doesn't bleed over into the data links.
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.
Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.
What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?
How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?
Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.