SonicWall SMA and Cisco IOS SSL VPN are competing in the secure remote access solutions category. Cisco IOS SSL VPN seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced feature set compared to SonicWall SMA's focus on cost benefits and customer service.
Features: SonicWall SMA offers compatibility with a wide range of devices, strong security protocols, and valuable security technologies like Capture ATP. Cisco IOS SSL VPN provides extensive network integration capabilities, seamless scalability, and integrated multifactor authentication with Cisco Duo.
Room for Improvement: SonicWall SMA could enhance advanced feature sets and deeper network integration. Its scalability could also be improved. Cisco IOS SSL VPN has room to simplify its deployment process, reduce initial costs, and improve detailed device compatibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall SMA is known for a straightforward deployment process complemented by comprehensive customer support. Cisco IOS SSL VPN deployment is more complex, but the robust support and extensive resources available post-deployment compensate for this.
Pricing and ROI: SonicWall SMA's initial low setup cost often leads to a quicker ROI. Cisco IOS SSL VPN, despite its higher initial cost, promises long-term benefits and feature-rich implementation, which can justify the investment through extended use and capabilities.
We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.