We performed a comparison between Cisco IOS SSL VPN and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"It's a stable solution."
"The multicast feature is useful for us."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is reasonably priced, and its technology is flexible."
"The customer service and support are the best. When it comes to support, Cisco is the best vendor ever."
"The most valuable features are that it's reliable, convenient, and easy. It always works if configured well."
"The product's setup phase was easy."
"IOS is user-friendly and simple. You connect to a particular VPN, and that's it. You become seamless after that."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"In terms of what needs improvement, it should have better integration. Although, it might have already been taken care of."
"The product's RPA tools need enhancement for simplified business process automation."
"Multi-factor authentication in Cisco IOS SSL VPN has certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"The pricing needs to be better."
"The flexibility of configurations could be improved."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN should improve its pricing."
"I have no notes in terms of areas of improvement."
"The only issue with Cisco IOS SSL VPN is on the price point. Price is an area of the solution where improvements are required."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
Earn 20 points
Cisco IOS SSL VPN is ranked 9th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 47 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 44th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Cisco IOS SSL VPN is rated 8.6, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cisco IOS SSL VPN writes "The solution is very stable and scalable, but it is expensive, and the configuration is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". Cisco IOS SSL VPN is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Zyxel VPN Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Ivanti Connect Secure and Citrix Gateway, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.