Azure Stack Reviews

Azure Stack delivered a positive financial impact for some organizations, particularly improving fleet utilization in mining, with increased efficiency noted but not quantified. However, some users did not observe significant gains. Financial benefits differ across users, often manifesting in the second year. Many find it economical, more so than competitors, seeing returns quickly after implementation. The per-user cost can decrease with larger user bases, enhancing economic benefits. Positive outcomes are seen without specific details on overall savings.

Azure Stack pricing is generally perceived as expensive, especially when compared to AWS and Google Cloud. The licensing model is complex, often requiring additional costs for support and services. Many users find the pay-as-you-go and subscription-based options beneficial. Costs vary by region and are influenced by the specific services utilized. While some enterprises find the pricing fair given the solution’s capabilities, others consider it too pricey, particularly for premium services and hardware maintenance.

• "Azure Stack is a very expensive solution."
• "The people who manage the budgets are satisfied with the solution’s medium pricing, which is neither very expensive nor very cheap."
• "I am using my Microsoft license, and it costs monthly. You need to pay additional costs apart from the standard costs."

Azure Stack is used primarily by service providers and businesses for hosting applications, hybrid cloud deployments, IoT, DevOps, and data analytics. Companies leverage its capabilities for compute resources, VM storage, networking, security, and compliance with regulations. It supports infrastructure, cybersecurity, and development environments, and acts as a platform for digital solutions, device management, and application hosting, offering flexibility for local data mandates and hybrid cases across multiple sectors.

Azure Stack user experiences with service and support vary widely. Some praise the efficiency and responsiveness, while others find response times lengthy. Many find technical support satisfactory, with quick resolutions and helpful interactions. However, others report dissatisfaction due to inadequate communication and delays. Support quality often hinges on subscription level and internal expertise, as experienced users may require less external assistance. Mixed feedback highlights both positive interactions and areas for improvement in service coordination.

Azure Stack's initial setup varies in complexity based on the environment and technical expertise. Many users find it straightforward, benefiting from integrated hardware and software. However, some face difficulties, especially with large deployments and specific configurations. On average, setup is completed in a few days to weeks, with partners often aiding in deployment. Factors such as user familiarity, data migration, and existing infrastructure play significant roles in the ease of setup.

Azure Stack's scalability is generally well-received. Users appreciate the ability to extend infrastructure easily, with many able to handle large user bases. Although some note AWS may offer simpler scaling features, the flexibility and governance of Azure Stack are praised. The option for scaling resources based on demand is acknowledged, and while some face challenges, particularly with regional availability, most agree Azure Stack effectively supports various business sizes and needs.

Azure Stack exhibits strong stability, scoring between seven and ten out of ten, with users noting excellent performance under heavy workloads. Minor bugs and occasional glitches are reported, yet Microsoft's support and redundancies mitigate disruptions. Experiences vary; while some face issues during VM migrations, others highlight seamless operation in cloud environments. Feedback suggests it supports multiple infrastructures reliably, and though occasional outages occur, ratings tend towards the higher end for stability satisfaction.