Azure Resource Manager Reviews

Enterprise users find Azure Resource Manager pricing involves significant costs, ranging from $15,000 to $20,000 monthly. Azure's pay-as-you-go model allows flexible usage. Core-based licenses cost approximately $11,000, while separate Microsoft licenses with software assurance are about $22,000 to $25,000 annually. Users emphasize Azure Resource Manager's value for secure, compliant cloud needs, though integrating with other clouds presents challenges due to a lack of plugins. Pricing and maintenance are considered expensive but beneficial for the right use case.

• "We pay $15,000 to $20,000 a month for the service and it is worth the cost."
• "The solution is open-source."

Companies primarily use Azure Resource Manager for provisioning cloud resources and resource groups for diverse projects, supporting digital transformations. It aids in data migration, integrating services like Azure Data Factory. Organizations customize infrastructures, creating governance with ARM templates. Role-Based Access Control policies apply for resource management, enabling centralized control and billing justification. Businesses utilize ARM for DevOps environments, managing resources via PowerShell or Terraform, enhancing security configurations while aligning with organizational policies.

Azure Resource Manager support receives mixed feedback. Users highlight language barriers and slow response times, especially when involving hardware vendors. Some customers find multi-language support and documentation helpful, while others rely on external resources like Google for issue resolution. High-priority tickets are resolved efficiently, but limited 24/7 support is a concern. Access through validated vendors such as HPE, Cisco, and Dell can delay assistance. Technical help is often rated around eight out of ten.

Azure Resource Manager's initial setup is easy and integrates seamlessly into the dashboard without deployment requirements. Users find it intuitive, though configuring roles can be challenging. Writing code is necessary for complex setups, demanding time for understanding and testing. Deployment duration varies, averaging about a week for large environments. Proper documentation aids this process. While Terraform enhances efficiency, ARM template deployments sometimes encounter regional issues, but they are generally successful.

Some users indicate no need for scaling due to their customer base. Others affirm it's scalable. For some, scalability isn't relevant as the tool focuses on logical grouping. This feature enables security governance based on group needs. While scalability isn't inherent to grouping, they acknowledge Azure Resource Manager's resources support a scalable model.

Azure Resource Manager is characterized by its stable nature, consistently delivering a reliable experience. Users frequently express confidence in its dependability, emphasizing its excellent reliability across various features like arranging, billing, segregation, compliance, and policies. Microsoft has made significant improvements to enhance the platform's stability, earning it high ratings for reliability. Azure Resource Manager effectively completes tasks required for services provisioning, consistently proving to be a trustworthy tool for their requirements.