No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Payment Security vs Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub vs Riskified comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is 2.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Riskified is 3.5%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Riskified3.5%
Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub2.7%
Broadcom Payment Security1.5%
Other92.3%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
Luis Inclan - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at Fix4Fraud
A flexible solution with a quick to navigate interface
The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable. I was familiar with the Falcon expert language to write rules, so I had to get used to the new language used in this solution. In the next release, as an additional feature, it will be good to have the capability to sort and play visual effects in the fields. This will help to distinguish each record from the other. For example, we currently have a bar that shows if a person has a high or low score. If the score is 35%, the bar is considered low, and if the score moves to 99%, the bar increases. However, we don't have the capability as interface users to make this function appear in other fields where we want it displayed. We have only the score field, which is pre-configured with this functionality.
JJ
Operations Manager at Wanderlust
Integrates well, reasonably priced, and the technical support is helpful
The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function. I am satisfied with the documentation it provides. It integrates well with other products The user interface could be more intuitive. I have been familiar with Riskified for three years. Riskified is a…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"Let's put it this way, it's like going from Larder to a Ferrari."
"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and the management support, which is excellent."
"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"For a bank, we've seen transactions move to e-commerce. We needed a solution that would protect the bank and protect the bank's cardholders, and that's what this solution gives us."
"It's the security and protection it offers our customers."
"They are excellent."
"The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model; you don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions."
"The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions."
"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
"I think that it is a great partnership if you are looking for reliable fraud prevention for your company."
"Riskified's KPIs are probably the highest in the industry."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function."
"The scoring mechanism is good."
"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
 

Cons

"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"Their response time was amazing, but it took a lot of time and the responses that we got were not really satisfactory, so it took a lot of time and alterations to get something fixed, which should have been fixed much earlier."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"At the moment, getting into that rich data is quite an effort."
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"No solution is going to be 100% up, but in terms of what we've seen, we've been quite happy."
"An area of improvement for this product would be the ability to view more transactional data to determine the cause of a failed transaction."
"There have been service outages/incidents and work has to be chased, for completion or comment."
"The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable."
"The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable."
"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
"I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"We didn't have the same consultants Riskified's side throughout the deployment, so we sometimes had to redefine the Business requests."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"The pricing is reasonable. It is not cheap, but it is fair."
"It is determined by the requirements of each company."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Performing Arts
10%
Financial Services Firm
37%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
ARIC Fraud Hub, ARIC platform
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
TSYS, OpenBet, William Hill, Zapp, Credit Reference Agency, Responsible Gambling Trust, Betfair, kPMG, Camelot
ALDO, Macy's, Finish Line, Burlington, Burton Group, Sky-tours, GiftCards.com, Kirna Zabête
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, BioCatch and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: May 2026.
894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.