No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Payment Security vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
20th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authe...
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is 2.9%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management2.9%
Broadcom Payment Security1.6%
Other95.5%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
RK
AML Compliance Analyst at HCLTech
Easy transaction monitoring but requires improvement in handling high user volumes
We can definitely improve the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool because I sometimes encounter issues while searching for particular customer transactions; it results in errors and I cannot easily find specific transactions. If there is improvement in those points, we can easily identify customer details and detect spikes in transactions to cover money laundering. Regarding specific features, I think AI should be implemented in the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool. AI should be integrated for better analysis and suggestions because nowadays, AI is very important for all organizations. If implemented, it can easily identify transaction details, reducing the need for extra manpower.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This is a good product, which is easy to deploy and has lot of user friendly features."
"I think stability-wise, we've not really had any issues in terms of stability."
"We see a high value in that, with all the fraud rules that we built, we have a very good false positive ratio because of the big data that CA has."
"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."
"The technical support team is professional and attentive to our needs and concerns."
"Helped reduce 3-D Secure losses to one of the lowest in the industry while having minimal customer impact."
"So it's pretty useful operation wise, and also in terms of some inquiries from us, if a customer is disputing they didn't receive an OTP password on their online transaction, and then they're disputing that it's not theirs, and it's unauthorized, but it was a successful transaction, I use this product to see the customer's previous IP addresses."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and the management support, which is excellent."
"The most valuable feature is the designer, which allows us to connect to UI and build things directly, such as creating a platform with our synchronizing policy manager rules, without any additional requirements."
"We don't have problems with stability and scalability, and it is a definitely scalable product that from the user point of view has the scalability to handle an adequate workload."
"The solution loads big data efficiently and quickly."
"Previously there were processes in place but not completely automatic; with NICE Actimize those processes have now been completely automated and we now receive a comprehensive view of exactly what risks are involved with a particular scenario, providing a complete picture which helps in rational decision making quicker."
"The most valuable feature is automation which makes our transaction capture 40 percent easier."
"The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition, and it is able to process large amounts of data."
"It has improved my organization because whenever there are transactions in high-risk countries that have a stricter set of rules, it alerts us to it, we can check to see if these are genuine transactions, and if it's suspicious we can see if we need to block or prevent those transactions."
"I like the score generated on the Actimize platform for each customer transaction. Those are transactions per second, accommodating millions of transactions per second. That's the best feature of Actimize."
 

Cons

"Their response time was amazing, but it took a lot of time and the responses that we got were not really satisfactory, so it took a lot of time and alterations to get something fixed, which should have been fixed much earlier."
"An area of improvement for this product would be the ability to view more transactional data to determine the cause of a failed transaction."
"No solution is going to be 100% up, but in terms of what we've seen, we've been quite happy."
"At the moment, getting into that rich data is quite an effort."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"The deployment process needs to be updated to ensure the base code does not involve details of other clients."
"Unifying operational changes around highlighting. If you highlight one item, it will highlight the one card that's affected across the board."
"In the first two years, there were several issues with stability."
"Sometimes when we move from one version to another, a few things don't work as expected."
"Risk Control Monitor, RCM, needs improvement."
"The solution needs to mitigate and provide an update for one listener process that keeps failing."
"Personally, I found the technical support to be a little slow. Sometimes this impacts our project timing which is also a problem for our end-users as well."
"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily."
"I think this solution is unnecessarily complex."
"The patch section has room for improvement."
"One of the issues with the product is that when the front end is down, the processes don't work."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."
"We need a separate license for each of the packages, such as the core package, self-development package, and customization package."
"It is reasonable for enterprise customers."
"Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is an expensive product."
"I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
907,731 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
19%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
34%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Sports Company
6%
Outsourcing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your primary use case for Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
I am working on Transaction Monitoring and Fraud Risk, and I have experience using the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool alongside World-Check and Salesforce for this purpose...
What needs improvement with Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
We can definitely improve the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool because I sometimes encounter issues while searching for particular customer transactions; it results in error...
What advice do you have for others considering Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
I have rated Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management a seven out of ten. AI should be integrated into the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool for better analysis an...
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
Actimize, NICE Actimize
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Associated Banc-Corp
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Payment Security vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
907,731 professionals have used our research since 2012.