| Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle for eight years; it's intuitive, strong in identity lifecycle management and policies, though performance lags with scale, and cloud adoption remains limited, but overall it's stable, scalable, and has excellent support. |
| Identity and Access Management at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is valuable for providing easy access based on roles through on-prem application connectors. However, it requires custom-built connectors, leading to high consultancy costs. We preferred SailPoint due to its existing connectors and global support. |
| Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 2.5 | I like RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle for access certification, but it needs better out-of-the-box customization and multi-tenant cloud capabilities. Stability, costly non-multi-tenant setup, and poor customer service are significant drawbacks. |
| Manager at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.0 | I value the easy data collection, but the product misses key features, lacks customization, and requires Oracle. Support was inefficient, causing delays. It's best for smaller environments without advanced integration needs. |
| Senior Network Engineer at Arwentech | 3.5 | I use RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle for network authentication, valuing its OTP security and easy setup. It's stable and scalable. While I recommend it, database integration and Pakistani technical support need improvement. I rate it 7/10. |
| Identity and Access Management Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 2.5 | I find this solution beneficial for small organizations, as its role management and connectors aid user access governance. However, I believe its UI, workflow, and scalability, particularly the appliance version for large volumes, require significant improvement. |
| Contractor - Technical Support Specialist at a recruiting/HR firm with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | I've used this stable solution for basic two-factor authentication for over 10 years, which improved our security. Initial deployment was difficult, a mistake done in-house. It was expensive upfront, so I recommend vendor assistance for implementation. |
| Help Desk Manager with 51-200 employees | 5.0 | I find this 2FA solution highly stable and scalable, streamlining authentication and reducing support calls. Setup is straightforward, and customer service is excellent, despite minor installation flexibility limitations. |
