Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle comparison

Microsoft and RSA are both solutions in the Identity Management (IM) category. Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8, while RSA is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 1.2% mindshare in IAM, compared to RSA’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 60% of RSA users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Read 20 Microsoft Entra ID Protection reviews

3,248 Views
487 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

RSA Identity Governance and...

Read 10 RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle reviews

854 Views
675 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

RSA Identity Governance and...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and Microsoft Entra ID Protection are competing products in identity management. RSA appears to have an upper hand in governance capabilities and integration options, while Microsoft Entra excels in security features, making it appealing despite potentially higher costs.

Features: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is known for strong governance capabilities, comprehensive access management, and flexibility in deployment. Its integration options are robust, allowing seamless interaction with various systems. Microsoft Entra ID Protection focuses on real-time threat detection, adaptive risk-based policies, and multifactor authentication, making it strong in proactive threat protection.

Room for Improvement: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle could improve in simplifying its setup process, making customization more user-friendly and enhancing user interface design. Microsoft Entra ID Protection can benefit from expanding its integration capabilities, offering more detailed reporting tools, and reducing the potential complexity of its identity protection features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle requires detailed configuration for deployment but offers reliable customer service to assist in this process. In contrast, Microsoft Entra ID Protection benefits from a seamless cloud-based deployment model, praised for being user-friendly and well-integrated within the Microsoft ecosystem, with responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle involves significant initial setup costs, which can lead to higher ROI over time due to its governance capabilities. Microsoft Entra ID Protection potentially incurs higher ongoing subscription costs but offers strong ROI through extensive security features and Microsoft service integration, providing value despite upfront expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (9th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (2nd)

RSA Identity Governance and...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

22nd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID Protection is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Entra ID Protection	1.2%
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle	1.2%
Other	97.6%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2133984

Sr. Security Analyst/Incident Response at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees

Conditional access provides detailed security customization

The best features of Microsoft Entra ID Protection are the conditional aspects, particularly the conditions that can be created. Microsoft Entra ID Protection has helped us because it gives us conditions that we can filter on or support, providing us more granularity. Microsoft Entra ID Protection allows blocking based on geolocation and similar parameters. The protections for handling identity threats in Microsoft Entra ID Protection, such as the automated remediation, are working effectively. With Microsoft Entra ID Protection, we are able to pivot off of particular alerts and stay abreast of them, which works to enhance our organization's security strategy. They definitely aid in threat detection with Microsoft Entra ID Protection.

Read full review

Harshul Nayak

Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Streamline identity lifecycle management with intuitive interfaces and robust policy features

The functions of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, especially the IGA, are quite strong with their custom forms and workflows integrated. The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall. However, it still has to be on-premise and the cloud version is not easily accessible, as dedicated instances are required and machines cannot be shared as multi-tenant for various customers. The advanced policy features of RSA definitely help in defining certain policies such as segregation of duties. That's particularly useful along with creating different access reviews. Regarding access control in simplifying access management, RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle has strong foundations of groups and roles, which help in defining all policies very easily. This makes it very easy to integrate with other access management tools or privileged access management tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft's support is commendable. Their response time is quick, and they handle inquiries effectively, ensuring ongoing support processes."

"The solution's technical support offers great assistance to users."

"We've integrated our other software with Microsoft, and we log into other software using Microsoft. That's very helpful."

"I find the most valuable feature to be conditional access."

"I use conditional access most of the time."

"The valuable features of Entra ID Protection include providing me visibility of my entire estate, managing access, and having a level of control."

"As an end-user, I find the experience to be quite seamless. My main advantage is that I only need to manage one login and one two-factor authentication method to access all the necessary tools. I don't have to set up separate logins and authentication for each application."

"We can solve many problems without deep knowledge of coding, and it's very quick to solve problems with the no-code, low-code solution of Microsoft for us."

More Microsoft Entra ID Protection pros

"The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall."

"Roles, connectors for provisioning and re-accreditation or reviews help greatly to govern user access."

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support."

"The data collection is excellent and easy to do. It does not require a lot of configuration nor does it require rules to be written like other competitors do."

"RSA Identity Governance and lifecycles are good for the access certification and auditing sections."

"With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes."

Cons

"The product's initial setup phase is not easy."

"Integrating some notifications, not necessarily all, but at least for important events or alerts, would be beneficial as it would function as a team solution or something similar."

"Microsoft has not offered control over how they calculate high or low-risk scenarios. While they mention if a low risk is found by Microsoft, the triggered policy isn't customizable."

"The solution is not optimized to work with Mac devices on a granular level. They work seamlessly with Windows but have a lot to improve to work with Mac devices. It also needs to improve stability and scalability."

"Entra ID lacks a function to synchronize from the cloud to the local directory. This is a significant issue since there is no write-back feature from the cloud to local, which would allow me to use my own credentials from the cloud tenant securely."

"The experience is not very smooth for the user. This is an area where Microsoft could improve the authorization process."

"I did have some trouble finding specific documentation, particularly for troubleshooting."

"Identity labeling and sensitivity needs improvement."

More Microsoft Entra ID Protection cons

"There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture."

"RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle could improve out-of-the-box customization."

"This product is missing a lot of features which other competitors are providing. One of the key features that are missing right now is risk scoring. Additionally, there is not much scope for customization - everything is hard-coded and predefined, so it does not allow the developers to make many modifications."

"If you use the appliance version then it won't handle a huge database volume."

"The user interface and workflow need improvement, and more connectors would help."

"Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors available in the product, because of which there are a lot of hidden consultancy costs."

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product cost is on the expensive side."

"The pricing is competitive in the SMA segment and runs $5-$6 per user."

"From one to ten, if one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the tool a seven out of ten."

"The price of Azure AD is not expensive."

"Azure Active Directory Identity Protection is not very expensive."

"Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."

"I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?

The pricing for Microsoft Entra ID protection is not expensive. It varies based on the company's size and quality.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?

We explore the possibilities to use Purview to control our applications, though not very deeply as it's not very helpful at this moment.For us, the most important problem is access; we need an easy...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?

We are still deep involved in the use of Microsoft technology for databases and business intelligence, and in the last three years with Power Apps and Power Automate, all that means Azure services,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

There is room for improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle. As the size becomes larger, the collections and unifications of the IDs process become quite slow, which can be improved fu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

We provide RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle as a service, mainly to oversee the digital identity lifecycle, from the initiation to the off-boarding at the end of that digital identity. Our cli...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

Overall, I would rate RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle at an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 23% of the time

One Identity Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 7% of the time

BloodHound Enterprise vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Protection Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 52% of the time

One Identity Manager vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 22% of the time

Saviynt vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Identity Governance vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 6% of the time

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

January 2026

Download Microsoft Entra ID Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

January 2026

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report

Download RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle product report

Also Known As

Azure Active Directory Identity Protection, Azure AD Identity Protection

SecurID

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID Protection enhances security through features like conditional access and multifactor authentication, optimizing identity management for enterprises. This robust solution ensures efficient control over access policies, supporting seamless integration and operational efficiency.

Microsoft Entra ID Protection provides advanced identity management, authentication, and authorization capabilities, supporting multifactor authentication and single sign-on to control digital identities effectively. It utilizes adaptive machine learning for security enhancements and automated risk-based actions, with seamless Microsoft Defender integration. Connectivity with third-party applications and real-time monitoring offers improved operational efficiency for managing large user bases. While it is a powerful tool, there is room to grow in areas such as identity labeling, password management, faster synchronization, better Mac compatibility, and improved scalability. Desired features include enhanced course availability for security training, streamlined implementation processes, and clarified interfaces.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID Protection?

Conditional Access: Control access policies to secure identity-related activities.
Multifactor Authentication: Strengthen sign-in security with multiple verification methods.
Single Sign-On: Simplify access to applications with a single set of credentials.
Identity Governance: Maintain compliance and manage identities efficiently.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Adaptive machine learning and risk-based actions reduce vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Integration and monitoring capabilities facilitate large-scale management.
Compliance Support: Aids in maintaining security compliance strategies.
Seamless Integration: Works effectively with Microsoft Defender and third-party apps.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Entra ID Protection to manage identities and access across sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology. They integrate hybrid environments, enforcing multifactor authentication and conditional access policies, which enables them to secure digital identities and align with compliance operations. Many synchronize on-premises Active Directory with cloud services, effectively managing users, groups, and licenses.

Microsoft

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.

RSA

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

December 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.