OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Reviews

We create workload models based on requirements, which vary by company. We also create scenarios to simulate real-world environments. 

The main objectives are stress testing, endurance testing, and spike testing, all for performance testing. We monitor the application using tools like LoadRunner or JMeter and provide reports to clients.

For functional testing, we use various checkpoints, like verifying if elements are enabled when we click on a page. These are GUI checkpoints. There are also text recognition, accessibility, and database checkpoints. You can insert these checkpoints into the script and validate them when you run it. 

Selenium has similar functionality, but you have to code it yourself. In UFT, it's a simple click to insert the checkpoints. 

Another great feature in UFT is synchronization. It ensures that the next line of code executes only after a page is fully loaded. You can do the same in Selenium, but you have to write the code manually.

Our use case involves functionality for a system ERP. We work with Deviation, which is stable and receives positive feedback from users.

OpenText UFT Developer allows junior testers to learn through open source and online resources like YouTube. They can find solutions to issues even if the solution does not work with them initially.

For functional testing, we are using OpenText Functional Testing for Developers as our product for testing.

I am using the cross-browser testing capabilities of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers, and they are providing cross-browser testing and API support.

We have a web application from our end, so cross-browser testing capability is necessary to qualify our web application in different browsers, which is very useful for me.

The parallel test feature is important, and it is available.

They support mobile testing as well. We had to do integration testing, and we are now looking into Katalon Studio for our automation for potential areas of improvement.

We have UI controls in Infragistics logic that have been identified by OpenText Functional Testing for Developers, but those controls are not supported by TestComplete, which is what I find most valuable.

I use AI-driven test automation features, and they provide AI-driven test automation support as well.

Jira integration is provided extensively along with everything they have.

For our specific project, we don't have any support for some of the UI controls, so we moved to OpenText Functional Testing for Developers from TestComplete.

We've used it across various technologies, including automation for web applications and SAP, as HP partnered with SAP for that integration. We've tried it on all platforms.

There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy.  Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.

We use Micro Focus UFT Developer to perform functional testing on both a desktop application and a web application.

One aspect that I like about Micro Focus UFT Developer is the ability to integrate it into a testing framework as a library.

They have LeanFT Library. This is the reason we choose this tool, we can It's because it can combine and integrate with any unit. 

Micro Focus UFT Developer's main focus is on your desktop application and web applications. 

The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT Developer is the flexibility to work with many different types of software.

We primarily use the solution in order to test functionality on other applications. It does have the capability of screengrabbing, recording, test automation, implementation of test cases, et cetera. It's called Unified Functional Test and therefore it does these functional requirements of the application in question.

Let's say that we're going to test yahoo.com and there're changes on the yahoo.com page. You can either hire a whole bunch of people to test every button, every functionality, every menu that exists on yahoo.com, or you can use UFT to record one session and then play it back a thousand times. You can either hire a thousand people or hire one person to record that session. And then you can execute the test case a thousand times. It saves a lot of time and resources for a company, in that sense.