Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OpenText Core Secure Access based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, and Ping Identity Platform.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
OpenText Core Secure Access surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration, robust encryption, and user-friendly features like intuitive collaboration tools, ensuring secure data exchange and efficient remote work environments.
OpenText Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
OpenText Core Secure Access prioritizes security with strong data protection and competitive pricing. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID offers extensive features and integrations, making it suitable for enterprises seeking comprehensive identity solutions despite its higher cost and more complex setup.
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud excels with extensive integration options, enhancing adaptability in complex environments. In comparison, OpenText Core Secure Access stands out for robust access control and advanced compliance tools, making it attractive for users prioritizing precise access management features.
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud offers a more straightforward setup with moderate costs, while OpenText Core Secure Access presents higher initial setup costs, highlighting a significant difference in budget considerations for deployment.
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud offers a more straightforward setup with moderate costs, while OpenText Core Secure Access presents higher initial setup costs, highlighting a significant difference in budget considerations for deployment.
Ping Identity Platform offers simplified integration and scalable solutions, making deployment quick and cost-efficient. In comparison, OpenText Core Secure Access provides extensive features and robust security, appealing to those valuing comprehensive access control despite a more complex implementation and higher cost.
Ping Identity Platform offers cost-effective setup pricing, making initial deployment seamless, while OpenText Core Secure Access presents a higher setup cost, potentially impacting budget considerations. Choose based on which setup cost aligns with your financial capability.
Ping Identity Platform offers cost-effective setup pricing, making initial deployment seamless, while OpenText Core Secure Access presents a higher setup cost, potentially impacting budget considerations. Choose based on which setup cost aligns with your financial capability.
ForgeRock offers affordable pricing and responsive support, appealing to businesses with its identity management focus. In comparison, OpenText Core Secure Access attracts buyers with its robust security features and customization, despite higher costs, ideal for those prioritizing data protection and control.
OpenText Core Secure Access is prized for its user-friendly integration and customer support. In comparison, Microsoft Identity Manager offers advanced features beneficial for complex environments. OpenText reduces deployment friction, while Microsoft delivers robust identity governance for detailed oversight despite higher costs.
OpenText Core Secure Access has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Identity Manager involves a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a key difference for users considering implementation.
OpenText Core Secure Access has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Identity Manager involves a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a key difference for users considering implementation.
