No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Faceki vs OpenText Core Secure Access comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Faceki
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
34th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Core Secure Access
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (33rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Faceki is 0.7%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Secure Access is 1.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Core Secure Access1.6%
Faceki0.7%
Other97.7%
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: August 2026.
911,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Covisint Identity Platform, OpenText IAM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Ally, BlueCross, BlueShield, Shell, BorgWarner, Carlson Wagonlit Travel, Cisco, Daimler, Delphi, Faurecia, Ford, GM, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Mitsubishi, On, Worthington Industries
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: August 2026.
911,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.