Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Fortify Software Security Center Logo

Top 10 Fortify Software Security Center Alternatives

Vendor: OpenText
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Fortify Software Security Center Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Fortify Software Security Center based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), GitLab, and Checkmarx One. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Fortify Software Security Center surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive vulnerability detection, seamless integration with development tools, and real-time analytics to enhance code security and efficiency, ensuring robust application protection and development continuity.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
4.0 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center is valued for its comprehensive security features and vulnerability detection, ideal for robust security needs. In comparison, SonarQube Server offers flexible deployment and cost-effectiveness, making it suitable for projects prioritizing code quality and budget-friendly solutions.
Download Fortify Software Security Center vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report
Fortify Software Security Center involves a substantial initial setup cost, whereas SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) offers a more budget-friendly setup, making SonarQube a cost-effective alternative in initial expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortify Software Security Center involves a substantial initial setup cost, whereas SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) offers a more budget-friendly setup, making SonarQube a cost-effective alternative in initial expenditure.
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center excels in comprehensive code scanning and reporting, appealing to enterprises seeking feature richness. In comparison, GitLab suits developers needing integration with DevOps workflows and CI/CD pipelines. Fortify requires higher setup commitment, while GitLab provides cost-effective, straightforward deployment.
Download Fortify Software Security Center vs. GitLab Report
Fortify Software Security Center involves a complex setup, while GitLab offers a streamlined and cost-effective installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortify Software Security Center involves a complex setup, while GitLab offers a streamlined and cost-effective installation process.
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center excels in vulnerability detection and coding standards, offering straightforward deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, Checkmarx One's extensive language support and advanced integration capabilities deliver greater versatility and value despite higher initial setup costs.
Download Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center Report
Fortify Software Security Center incurs high setup costs, making it less appealing for budget-conscious users, whereas Checkmarx One offers a more affordable setup, attracting those looking for cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortify Software Security Center incurs high setup costs, making it less appealing for budget-conscious users, whereas Checkmarx One offers a more affordable setup, attracting those looking for cost-effective solutions.
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Acunetix is cost-effective and integrates efficiently with third-party tools for quick assessments. In comparison, Fortify Software Security Center is chosen for its extensive testing capabilities, despite higher costs, meeting the needs of large enterprises requiring in-depth security analysis.
Download Acunetix vs. Fortify Software Security Center Report
Acunetix offers straightforward setup costs, making it attractive for users prioritizing budget-friendly solutions, while Fortify Software Security Center requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Acunetix offers straightforward setup costs, making it attractive for users prioritizing budget-friendly solutions, while Fortify Software Security Center requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities.
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
HCL AppScan attracts tech buyers with strong vulnerability detection and cost-effective features. In comparison, Fortify Software Security Center, while requiring higher investment, appeals with its extensive analysis and comprehensive capabilities, offering long-term value. Each solution addresses different priorities in application security needs.
Download Fortify Software Security Center vs. HCL AppScan Report
HCL AppScan offers minimal setup costs, enhancing quick deployment, while Fortify Software Security Center requires more substantial initial investments, reflecting its comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan offers minimal setup costs, enhancing quick deployment, while Fortify Software Security Center requires more substantial initial investments, reflecting its comprehensive security features.
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Semgrep
4.0 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Semgrep
4.0 out of 5
Semgrep excels in code analysis, offering real-time scanning and customization, making it ideal for developers seeking tailored solutions. It boasts a flexible rule set and easy deployment. However, it can benefit from enhanced documentation and performance optimization to better cater to expanding user needs.
View comparison

Related categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Application Security Tools
Software Development Analytics