LoadBalancer Enterprise offers a reliable, high-availability solution designed for efficient load distribution and a user-friendly interface, catering to teams with foundational network expertise.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| LoadBalancer Enterprise | 4.3% |
| F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | 14.3% |
| NetScaler | 12.7% |
| Other | 68.7% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) | Mar 29, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Mar 29, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | LoadBalancer Enterprise vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | Mar 29, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | LoadBalancer Enterprise vs NetScaler | Mar 29, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | LoadBalancer Enterprise vs HAProxy | Mar 29, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NetScaler | 4.2 | 12.7% | 91% | 107 interviewsAdd to research |
| F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | 4.1 | 14.3% | 83% | 124 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 65 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 33 |
| Large Enterprise | 63 |
LoadBalancer Enterprise enhances network performance through effective traffic routing, monitoring, and high availability. Users benefit from SSL termination with SNI and Layer 7 load balancing, ensuring seamless connections with reduced complexity compared to alternatives. While known for its user-friendly approach, improvements in configuration simplicity, scalable hardware upgrades, and enhanced notification systems are often discussed for better user experience. Additional demands include HTTP API access, automated configuration backups, DNS load balancing, and enhanced graphing data capabilities. Competitive pricing and heightened security for sensitive data are frequently requested. Interface refresh issues and Microsoft compatibility are noted among users, who deploy it for SSL/HTTP traffic management, redundancy, failover capabilities, web filtering, and cloud migration support.
What are LoadBalancer Enterprise's key features?LoadBalancer Enterprise is implemented across industries for managing SSL/HTTP traffic, enhancing network reliability, and providing failover capabilities. It supports web filtering, balances Exchange and application servers, facilitates cloud migration, and manages multiple ISP lines for optimal traffic distribution across web applications and services, including SIP provisioning. Industries also use it for enhancing security with web application firewalls, DNS sharing, and application publishing.
Vodafone, NASA, Mercedes, NBC, Siemens, AT&T, Barclays, Zurich, Penn State University, Fiserv, Canon, Toyota, University of Cambridge, US Army, US Navy, Ocean Spray, ASOS, Pfizer, BBC, Bacardi, Monsoon, River Island, U.S Air Force, King's College London, NHS, Ricoh, Philips, Santander, TATA Communications, Ericcson, Ross Video, Evertz, TalkTalk TV, Giacom, Rapid Host.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| CTO at Malam Engineering PLC | 4.0 | I primarily use Loadbalancer.org for presale load balancing solutions. Its key strength lies in effective load balancing. However, there is room for improvement. For larger organizations, I suggest considering alternatives like Radware. |
| UCaaS Engineering Manager at EarthLink | 5.0 | I highly value this stable WAF solution for its ease of setup and effective blocking of hacking attempts on our Metaswitch SIP servers. It greatly improved our security and business growth, even with some minor support and vendor integration wishes. |
| Consultant at Altran | 4.0 | I use Loadbalancer.org for Nova Network and F5 load balancing. Its scalability is a valuable feature, but it sometimes encounters issues and has a complex setup. There's room for improvement in reliability and ease of use. |
| Ifra Texture Specialist at kyndryl | 4.5 | I use Loadbalancer for app publishing and high availability, valuing its server connection maintenance and stability, which reduces downtime. While scalable and recommended, its configuration is complex, which I find challenging. |
| Head Of Business at Zeta-Web Nigeria Limited | 3.5 | I appreciate Loadbalancer.org's good performance and stability. My main concern is that while technically scalable, its high cost limits clients' ability to expand, despite decent support. |
| System Engeneer at CROC | 4.0 | I recommend Loadbalancer.org for small businesses needing simple website balancing without HA/DR. It's less complex than Citrix and easy to deploy, though its price and complexity could still be reduced. I rate it 8/10. |
| System Consultant at Notable Frontier Sdn Bhd | 4.0 | We use Loadbalancer.org to distribute data evenly across multiple servers, preventing overload on any single server. It could improve security features to safeguard sensitive data from unauthorized access. We didn't consider other solutions or deployment changes. |
| Senior Network and Security Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I've used F5 for over a decade, finding it a stable, scalable "Swiss Army knife" for various functions. While it's pricey and best suited for larger organizations, setup is straightforward, and support is good. I rate it 8/10. |
