Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Logo

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) pros and cons

Vendor: IBM
3.6 out of 5

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) provides rich planning features with Scrum concepts such as Sprint and Sprint retrospective, which assist in effective framework implementation.
The cataloging feature is valuable for enterprises to clearly define which applications are responsible for specific features.
IBM Rational ALM within ELM excels in providing management and traceability, test management tools, and enabling workflow capabilities for seamless team collaboration.
The integration with Git and reporting features, such as CPU usage on the dashboard, allow for effective resource management and monitoring.
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) supports companies in regulated industries by facilitating documentation that meets audit requirements.

CONS

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management should improve reporting features with a focus on work history and deeper tracking.
There is insufficient beginner support material like FAQs or simple training resources for IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management.
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management requires more intuitive features to enhance user experience.
Stability improvements are necessary for IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management.
The interconnectivity between different packages in IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management needs enhancement.
 

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Pros review quotes

LG
Sep 8, 2019
It is relatively easy to use and user-friendly once the setup is complete.
NK
Oct 1, 2019
At the same time, if you're working from the architect or the designing team you, it's quite easy to manage the resources online.
LasseMikkonen - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 31, 2025
For companies in heavily regulated industries who are doing product development, IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is a good tool as it helps them create documentation that satisfies auditors.
Learn what your peers think about IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2025.
873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Manoj Sajjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 3, 2023
I would rate the stability of this product a nine out of ten.
Juergen Albrecht - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 16, 2025
The most valuable feature is how IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) allows me to present to the customer what the actual software, even hardware, will do.
reviewer1251984 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 10, 2022
The integration with Git works well.
AH
Aug 13, 2020
You can customize the board according to your needs.
reviewer1256694 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 5, 2020
The most valuable feature is the reporting of the CPU usage on the dashboard.
Avijit Amitabh - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 23, 2024
The transition to a SaaS-based solution is a distinct advantage.
reviewer2344761 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 16, 2024
The solution is customizable.
 

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Cons review quotes

LG
Sep 8, 2019
There is not enough beginner support material in the form of FAQs or simple training to help you get started.
NK
Oct 1, 2019
The directory designer manager is uncivil. The design manager is clearly really unstable.
LasseMikkonen - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 31, 2025
If you look at the UI, it was literally designed ten years ago, and even at the time it was introduced, it was already somewhat outdated.
Learn what your peers think about IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2025.
873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Manoj Sajjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 3, 2023
Some improvements to the user interface (UI) would be helpful, such as exposing more services to make it easier to customize to the needs of each customer.
Juergen Albrecht - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 16, 2025
Improvement is needed in bridging DNG and Rhapsody and vice versa for better data exchange from both sides with some trigger technologies.
reviewer1251984 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 10, 2022
One of the complaints from users is that they have to click buttons too many times for just a simple task. Changing this would lead to a better user experience.
AH
Aug 13, 2020
The reporting functionality needs to be improved.
reviewer1256694 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 5, 2020
The stability of this solution can be improved.
Avijit Amitabh - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 23, 2024
The user interface requires significant improvement as it is overly complex.
reviewer2344761 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 16, 2024
The GUI is a little bit outdated.