HyperScience Pros review quotes

SP
Mar 23, 2022
One of the most valuable features of HyperScience is the user-training module. Whenever the extraction takes place, based on the way we have trained HyperScience, it would give us some success status or a certain confidence level. If the solution has processed something that it determined was not extracted correctly it will queue those items for manual review.
Satender Sajwan - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 25, 2022
It provides the best accuracy for handwritten forms, which is a struggle in the industry. You can take processes with a lot of manual work and streamline them through this tool.
NK
Jul 14, 2022
We have seen pretty good accuracy.
Learn what your peers think about HyperScience. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
YS
Aug 12, 2021
I like that compared to other tools, HyperScience works best with handwritten documents.
Abdul Quadir - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 5, 2022
Valuable features include tools like IQ Bot and the ability to extract handwritten documents with 93-95 per cent accuracy.
Pavan Nanjundappa - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 8, 2022
What I liked more about HyperScience was the quality of the OCR it is a lot better compared to Google.
Pavan Balaji - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 1, 2022
Has algorithms that can detect a document template even if the image has a lot of distortions.
 

HyperScience Cons review quotes

SP
Mar 23, 2022
No solution is perfect and there are several different scenarios that could be improved in HyperScience. One area is where there are multiple tables in the same form I have seen HyperScience struggle. There is some issue with supporting the extraction from multiple tables involved on the same form. If this could improve, it would be a big benefit.
Satender Sajwan - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 25, 2022
HyperScience has less capability while working on unstructured forms. Unstructured forms are those where there is no standard structure and the information can be anywhere on the form. They need to develop this capability.
NK
Jul 14, 2022
They could work on the price and make it a bit more reasonable.
Learn what your peers think about HyperScience. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
YS
Aug 12, 2021
The product's usability could be better. The first pain point is that we're getting the output in a different format, and we were expecting a different timetable. The second point is that if you want better results, HyperScience says you have to configure a minimal PDF or a maximum of 400 PDFs. If you want results with 400 PDFs for what's written by these doctors, then you also configure the maximum of 400 templates for that. So, it's essentially a lack of support from HyperScience. In the next release, it would be better if failure scenarios were reduced. It would also help if they offered different formats, inputs or injections, and added different scenarios.
Abdul Quadir - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 5, 2022
Extracting tables from certain documents could be improved.
Pavan Nanjundappa - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 8, 2022
HyperScience could improve the unstructured data extraction feature.
Pavan Balaji - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 1, 2022
The solution lacks support for a greater range of languages.