No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Fortinet FortiADC Logo

Fortinet FortiADC Reviews

Vendor: Fortinet
4.0 out of 5

What is Fortinet FortiADC?

Featured Fortinet FortiADC reviews

Fortinet FortiADC mindshare

As of April 2026, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiADC in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 9.3%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiADC9.3%
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)13.6%
NetScaler12.2%
Other64.9%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerResearch reports based on Fortinet FortiADC reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)Apr 13, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersApr 13, 2026Download
ComparisonFortinet FortiADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Apr 13, 2026Download
ComparisonFortinet FortiADC vs HAProxyApr 13, 2026Download
ComparisonFortinet FortiADC vs NetScalerApr 13, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
NetScaler4.212.2%91%107 interviewsAdd to research
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)4.113.6%83%124 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 1, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business181
Midsize Enterprise120
Large Enterprise296
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Outsourcing Company
5%
Educational Organization
5%
University
5%
Retailer
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Non Profit
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Legal Firm
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%

Compare Fortinet FortiADC with alternative products

Learn more about Fortinet FortiADC

Fortinet FortiADC customers

Related questions

 
Fortinet FortiADC Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Technical Engineer at Safezone Secure Solutions Private Limited3.5I use FortiADC primarily for load balancing and SSL transition, finding its FortiAnalyzer integration valuable. While stable with good support, I wish for more custom load balancing algorithms and find it expensive. Overall, I rate it 7/10.
Team Lead at Adapt Information Technologies (Pvt) Ltd4.0I find Fortinet FortiADC easy for application load balancing and cluster implementation, which are my primary uses. Fortinet support is good. I haven't explored advanced features like WAF, which I wish were easier to implement for customers.
Security Network Architect at novonordisc4.0I rate FortiADC an 8 for its stable, integrated load balancing within the Fortinet ecosystem and excellent support. Automation is inconvenient with other Fortinet platforms, and F5 offers more algorithms.
Senior Network Engineer at SP SYSNET PTE. LTD.4.0I value FortiADC for web application load balancing, its traffic shaping, session control, and efficient monitoring. Support effectively troubleshoots remotely but re-asks details and offers no design help, despite the high cost.
Senior Technical Consultant at CBR Cyber Pty Ltd4.0I find FortiADC highly stable and scalable, offering excellent WAF and load-balancing. It's a cost-effective solution with easy setup and provides great insight into application performance, though I wish sFlow integration was better for more context.
IT Manager at Technology Evaluation Center3.0I use this solution for GSLB and web traffic protection, appreciating its high availability, redundancy, and reasonable cost. However, I believe its WAF requires an upgrade, and I prefer older, more stable versions over newer ones.
System administrator at ALSU4.5I use FortiADC for load balancing and SSL certificate management, finding it very stable and reliable. While it's generally good, I wish for more user-friendly features and in-depth network activity insights. I rate it a nine out of ten.
Network and Security Administrator at YU3.5I use Fortinet ADC for SSL offloading and load balancing, finding it very stable and performance-enhancing. While setup was complex, its user-friendly interface is good. I recommend it, though redundant licenses are a drawback.