Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
FME Logo

FME pros and cons

4.3 out of 5
499 followers
Start review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

FME has a vast range of connectors and few forms, enhancing its versatility.
It executes spatial features with unrivaled efficiency, allowing triggers by various events.
Standard plug-ins are available for different data sources, facilitating integration.
FME allows sharing of workbenches and minor changes without extra tools like GitHub.
It handles the conversion of spatial objects and their attributes with spatial awareness.

CONS

FME needs to improve in terms of pricing and scalability.
Geographical transformations require enhancement, although user skill levels may also contribute to challenges.
FME's pricing structure is not suitable for the African market.
Improvements are necessary for mapping presentations.
The lack of an easy looping feature to iterate through data efficiently is a common community request.
 

FME Pros review quotes

Alan Bloor - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 8, 2023
We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.
reviewer2626457 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 27, 2023
All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable.
reviewer1381977 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 26, 2022
The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process.
Learn what your peers think about FME. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1490019 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 27, 2021
It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis.
reviewer2700207 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 5, 2025
FME is spatially aware and understands how to deal with the conversion of spatial objects and their attributes.
reviewer2257626 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 15, 2023
It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources.
 

FME Cons review quotes

Alan Bloor - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 8, 2023
The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point.
reviewer2626457 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 27, 2023
Improvements could be made to mapping presentations.
reviewer1381977 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 26, 2022
FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions.
Learn what your peers think about FME. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1490019 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 27, 2021
To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues.
reviewer2700207 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 5, 2025
We are looking at the possibility of using Glue instead of FME, using the native AWS product.
reviewer2257626 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 15, 2023
FME's price needs improvement for the African market.