We performed a comparison between Veeam Agent for Linux and Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Backup solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup and deployment are easy. It's straightforward."
"Veeam Agent for Linux's most valuable feature is the compatibility with virtual machines, such as VMware."
"Veeam has a "next, next, finish" installer, and the overall deployment is straightforward. The deployment is easy because Veeam is compatible with all our VMware services and VMs. Veeam Backup and Veeam ONE are integrated into vCenter or vSphere site deployments, so we don't need to deploy each server one by one."
"I like the incremental backups and their failover."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to pick up individual files."
"We found the initial setup to be quite simple."
"The most valuable features are backup and restore. This solution is also easy to use."
"The solution is useful for taking backups for end-user laptops and end-user workstations where data is involved."
"The solution is meeting all of our client's requirements. It has good performance."
"The solution is very affordable for small businesses."
"It is good and easy to use for backing up physical servers. It is working fine, and it is stable and scalable."
"I don't have any major problems with the agent connectivity with Microsoft applications or Microsoft Azure."
"The product is free to use. We don't have to pay for a license."
"The integration needs improvement."
"The solution is pretty stable right now, however, we believe that the solution could be made to be even more stable."
"The price of Veeam Agent for Linux could be reduced."
"They could be more customer-friendly."
"A lower price would always be beneficial."
"The price of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows could improve."
"Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows should improve by having more features, easier deployment, and compatibility with Unix boxes."
"The compression ratio and application ratio could still be improved in this solution. Reporting could also be improved, for better monitoring."
"I can't think of anything that may be missing."
"With the currency exchange, the solution ends up being quite expensive."
"If they could let you can do replication to physical servers - a backup from physical servers and a replication to physical servers - that will be better."
"There isn't really anything I would like to improve. Maybe the solution could be more secure."
More Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows Pricing and Cost Advice →
Veeam Agent for Linux is ranked 28th in Cloud Backup with 5 reviews while Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is ranked 10th in Cloud Backup with 15 reviews. Veeam Agent for Linux is rated 7.6, while Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Veeam Agent for Linux writes "Easy to deploy and user-friendly with good technical support and ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows writes "Flexible and stable with good technical support". Veeam Agent for Linux is most compared with Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, IBM Spectrum Protect and Carbonite Server, whereas Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Acronis Backup, Rubrik, Veritas NetBackup and Quest Rapid Recovery. See our Veeam Agent for Linux vs. Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows report.
See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors and best Backup and Recovery Software vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
