"Definitely, the best feature for Cisco Secure Endpoint is the integration with Talos. On the backend, Talos checks all the signatures, all the malware, and for any attacks going on around the world... Because Secure Endpoint has a connection to it, we get protected by it right then and there."
"The most valuable feature is signature-based malware detection."
"I'm only using the AMP (advanced malware protection) which is protecting my file system from all the malicious things that might happen. It should protect all kinds of things that might happen on the servers, things that I cannot see."
"The threat Grid with the ability to observe the sandboxing, analyze, and perform investigations of different malicious files has been great."
"The most valuable feature is its threat protection and data privacy, including its cyber attack and data protection, as we need to cover and protect data on user devices."
"Among the most valuable features are the exclusions. And on the scalability side, we can integrate well with the SIEM orchestration engine and a number of applications that are proprietary or open source."
"Device Trajectory is one of the most valuable features. We're able to dig in and really understand how things came to be and where to focus our efforts."
"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using this product is that there is a lot more malware slipping through my email filters than I expected."
"Threat prevention is valuable because most clients use other solutions like antivirus as part of web protection. I don't find that kind of solution useful."
"The solution is stable."
"The package of protection that it provides is useful. It has antivirus, malware protection, VPN, and a whole bunch of other features."
"The DLP and user interface are the most valuable feature."
"It provides a lot of information and great visibility, with really great options for managing the environment."
"The performance is good."
"I think the costing is fine compared to other products. Cost-wise you definitely get value for your money."
"Would benefit with the addition of DLP features."
"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."
"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."
"This product has issues with the number of false positives that it reports."
"The GUI needs improvement, it's not good."
"It could be improved in connection with artificial intelligence and IoT."
"We don't have issues. We think that Cisco covers all of the security aspects on the market. They continue to innovate in the right way."
"The thing I hate the most, which they have not fixed, is when it creates duplicate entries within a console. If you have a computer and you upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 10, or you upgrade your agent from version 6 to 7, it creates a new instance in there instead of updating the information. Instead of paying a license for one computer, I have to license two computers until I manually go in, search for all the duplicate entries, and clean them out myself."
"I would like to see integration with Cisco Analytics."
"We had a lot of noise at the beginning, and we had to turn it down based on exclusions, application whitelisting, and excluding unknown benign applications. Cisco should understand the need for continuous updates on the custom Cisco exclusions and the custom applications that come out-of-the-box with the AMP for Endpoints."
"In Orbital, there are tons of prebuilt queries, but there is not a lot of information in lay terms. There isn't enough information to help us with what we're looking for and why we are looking for it with this query. There are probably a dozen queries in there that really focus on what I need to focus on, but they are not always easy to find the first time through."
"An area of improvement for this solution is to make it easier to manage."
"There is room to improve with scalability."
"The initial setup isn't so easy. You need to know what you are doing."
"There are times the solution has some additional software added that is not fully integrated properly, such as Exchange Group Sheild. It is quite old and is not fully integrated properly and could be improved."
"Technical support is an area that can be improved because sometimes, the response time is a bit slow and the explanation is short."
"The local technical support could be better."
"We would like to see all the features available on cloud."
"There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive."
"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."
"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."
Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 14th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 37 reviews while VIPRE Endpoint Security is ranked 36th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 2 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while VIPRE Endpoint Security is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Protect your business against a wide variety of threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VIPRE Endpoint Security writes "Easy to upgrade and manage but needs better reporting". Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike Falcon, whereas VIPRE Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne, Carbon Black CB Defense, Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra and Sophos Intercept X. See our Trellix Endpoint Security vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) vendors.
We monitor all EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.