Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

ThreatQ
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
23rd
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (12th)
Torq
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
25th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of ThreatQ is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Torq is 4.5%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
Unique Categories:
Threat Intelligence Platforms
3.4%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

JR
Mar 28, 2024
Improves the threat intelligence gathering process, but it is not user-friendly
We used the solution for threat mapping and managing IoCs ThreatQ is a very good tool. We can create playbooks. The solution’s data aggregation and correlation capabilities are good. The product has connectors for the majority of the security controls. Integrating the solution with our existing…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Educational Organization
10%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Retailer
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ThreatQ?
Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy.
What needs improvement with ThreatQ?
The tool is not user-friendly. It is not beginner-friendly. It would be very difficult for a beginner to learn the tool. It will take at least two months to get familiar with it. Building the playb...
What is your primary use case for ThreatQ?
We used the solution for threat mapping and managing IoCs.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Radar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.