No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Seemplicity
Sponsored
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (133rd), Cloud Security Remediation (4th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (17th)
The Nagomi Proactive Defens...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (15th)
ThreatConnect Threat Intell...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (7th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform1.1%
Pentera10.2%
XM Cyber10.0%
Other78.7%
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)3.7%
Recorded Future6.7%
CrowdStrike Falcon4.6%
Other85.0%
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
 

Featured Reviews

Yaron Blachman - PeerSpot reviewer
Member And Investor at OpenWeb
Centralized security workflows have reduced alert noise and now prioritize critical remediation
In recent months, we have started to use Seemplicity's investigations and analysts feature, and it also appears to be a good capability. It is not fully utilized yet, but it does show potential. We see many instances where based on the original data from security systems, Seemplicity determines that a certain ticket is of high priority and should be addressed, but when we handle it, we often find that some information is missing or it is not really such a high priority. The analysts feature brings in additional AI capabilities where they investigate the topic in depth. So far, we have found that their findings are very accurate. If we decide to implement it and turn it on for all cases, or at least for all high-critical and high-risk issues, it will probably reduce the workload on our human analysts. Seemplicity offers three best features. One is the option to deduplicate alerts between security platforms, which is something we do not have the capability for anywhere else. The second is managing the remediation queues, which is truly useful; it ensures that developers and the security team receive the right tickets in the right amount, with the right priority and right details, and then tracking them is very useful. It is a single point to manage all our security activity. The deduplication feature helps my team day-to-day by reducing the amount of work. When we examine security incidents, usually one security flaw—a new zero-day vulnerability in a library we use—triggers alerts across different systems, from our vulnerability management platforms to our real-time runtime monitoring systems to our Wiz platform, showing us the same issue across multiple instances. This might generate hundreds of different alerts. Seemplicity allows us to deduplicate them into one single action that a security person or developer needs to perform to fix all of these alerts. Instead of having 100 or 200 different tickets opened to different teams, we have a very specific team that receives one single ticket to solve it all. When we started with Seemplicity, we saw an 85% reduction in the number of tickets through deduplication, and that is significant for our teams who are swamped with issues. Seemplicity has positively impacted our organization overall by reducing the number of tickets that are opened, allowing the team to really focus on what is important. We have less noise, so we are very focused, and using this tool has helped us reduce the number of vulnerabilities and issues we address. We are at the point where we have zero critical issues and probably less than ten high-risk issues, which we are constantly addressing and will likely resolve soon. We are also beginning to tackle medium and low-risk issues, which we never could before. Having this deduplication reduction helps us really focus on advancing our security posture.
Pasan Jayarathna - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Security Engineer at Cyberwell Solution
Centralized insights have improved vulnerability tracking and simplified cross-tool comparisons
The best features The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform offers is the ability to compare each tool. For example, both Tenable and Cortex provide security protection. In scenarios where we did not deploy Cortex XDR to some devices, we can identify this through The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform because it compares data with the Tenable side. This allows us to perform cross-checking between Tenable and Cortex. If we miss Cortex deployment for end devices, that endpoint could be vulnerable to our cloud applications, so this capability is invaluable. The main feature is the ability to check vulnerabilities. Beyond that, we can cross-check any misconfiguration and missing configuration, such as Cortex missing or Tenable vulnerability management missing on end devices. The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform shows us a summary of vulnerabilities, which gives us an idea about the security posture of our entire environment. Based on this information, we can decide what security gaps exist on our network and provide solutions to fix these vulnerability gaps. For example, some end devices may not be updated. The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform checks all summaries and provides a list of assets that are not updated. It gives a complete list by CVE of all devices that are not updated, which we can then provide to our team for remediation. We can request that they upgrade applications such as Google Chrome across all devices.
Nikhil Jethwa - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
Centralized threat intelligence has streamlined IOC workflows and now improves response time
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has positively impacted our organization by significantly reducing response times and improving detection accuracy by ensuring only high-confidence, context-rich indicators are pushed to security controls. From an operational standpoint, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has helped us reduce IOC handling and response time from hours to minutes by automating injection, enrichment, and distribution workflows.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have seen improvements in remediation rates, as initially a lot of our metrics were in the red, but now all are in the green or yellow."
"When we started with Seemplicity, we saw an 85% reduction in the number of tickets through deduplication, and that is significant for our teams who are swamped with issues."
"The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform allows us to save our time and protect our system and network."
"ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has positively impacted our organization by significantly reducing response times and improving detection accuracy by ensuring only high-confidence, context-rich indicators are pushed to security controls."
"It is used to help an operations team with the identification and resolution of threats in an automated, zero-touch fashion."
"ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface; I loved it, and it's really great and easy to configure."
"The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP."
"We have been able to see a return on investment as our clients believe in us more."
"The tool's installation, integration, and playbooks are very straightforward."
"It's a solid platform and is stable enough. It is not complicated and is easy to use."
"I like their customer support."
 

Cons

"Every tool, including Seemplicity, can improve, and I think it needs to further enhance its deduplication capabilities and understand how to integrate with more security tools, especially as new AI security tools emerge."
"Seemplicity could be improved with some of the aggregation accessibility. Currently, it is a bit of a black box and can be a bit of a bottleneck."
"My main concern is that The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform would be better if it were more user-friendly."
"I would like to see improvements in the time zone support of their customer service, considering users are from different time zones."
"It would be good to have more feeds and more integrated sources for enrichment."
"ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) could be improved by simplifying the user interface to better fit day-to-day analyst workflow and reducing the complexity of configuring playbook and score logic."
"Support is an area with which nobody is ever fully satisfied, so it can be improved."
"They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community."
"Integration is an area that could use some improvement."
"I couldn’t get any training videos online when I was working with the tool."
"Sometimes, when using the solution, it slows down, affecting our ability to mitigate threats."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
Information not available
"The price of this product is in the mid-range, not too expensive, nor inexpensive."
"The tool is expensive."
"I rate the product price as six on a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten means it is cheap."
"The price could be better."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.
904,973 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
20%
Legal Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Hospitality Company
7%
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise23
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform?
I would like to see The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform improve in terms of the dashboard. If I could get better re...
What is your primary use case for The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform?
Since I joined this company, I have been using The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform. Before I joined, they had alrea...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
My experience with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that...
What needs improvement with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
Based on my experience, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is already doing a great job in the market b...
What is your primary use case for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
Our main use case for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is to centralize, analyze, and operationalize ...
 

Interactive Demo

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Customer Case Studies & Use Cases
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Zafran Security, Wiz and others in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). Updated: June 2026.
904,973 professionals have used our research since 2012.