TestingWhiz vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

"TestingWhiz is a low code, no code tool with integration facilities, such as with Jira, and can be used over the cloud."

"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."

"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."

"The whole suite is made for .NET development."

"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."

"This product is a nine out of ten."

"It is a good and user-friendly tool."

"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."

"You can easily write code, test, and deploy within the same environment. It is a mature tool. It regularly receives new updates and versions. In my opinion, it's one of the best products by Microsoft for developers."

"Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available."

"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."

"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its scalability."

"The data flow can be improved."

"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."

"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."

"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."

"The interface should be made attractive."

"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."

"The tool is expensive in my region."

"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."

"Users have to pay a licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional, which is expensive."

"The tool is affordable."

"The product is very expensive."

"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."

"We use the solution’s community version, and the solution’s pricing could be cheaper."