• Home
  • TestingWhiz vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

TestingWhiz vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cygnet Infotech Logo

TestingWhiz

125 views|101 comparisons
Microsoft Logo

Visual Studio Test Professional

Read 46 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews
898 views|763 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between TestingWhiz and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use TestingWhiz?
Kevin McAllister
Highly stable solution with a rich IDE
Visual Studio Test Professional has allowed us to increase the quality of one of our web portal products drastically. We went two years with only... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."
  • "I think that the pricing is quite good."
  • "The pricing is expensive."
  • "We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."
  • "There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."
  • "Visual Studio Test Professional is a very expensive solution."
  • "The tool is expensive in my region."
  • "We pay a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional, which is expensive."

    • More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.
    Read all 35 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Tes...
    Top Answer:Visual Studio Test Professional is not an expensive solution.
    Read all 22 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?
    Top Answer:The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution. There used to be references material that were incorporated in the solution, but most of it has moved to… more »
    Read all 34 answers   →
    Ranking
    38th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    125
    Comparisons
    101
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    7th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    898
    Comparisons
    763
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    278
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Cygnet Infotech
    Microsoft
    Overview

    TestingWhiz is a Codeless Automation Testing Tool for Software, Web, Mobile, Database, Cloud, Web Services and API testing. It is pillared on a strong architecture combined with intuitive Automation Engine and short learning curve that promises to take your test automation to the next level.

    Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
    Sample Customers
    Verizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost
    Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company35%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    TestingWhiz is ranked 38th in Functional Testing Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. TestingWhiz is rated 0.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". TestingWhiz is most compared with , whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.