TestingWhiz vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

Cygnet.One and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Cygnet.One is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.0, while Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5. Cygnet.One holds a 0.2% mindshare in FT, compared to Microsoft’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cygnet.One users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

TestingWhiz

Read 1 TestingWhiz review

233 Views
189 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 52 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

954 Views
401 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

TestingWhiz

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between TestingWhiz and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 871,408 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TestingWhiz

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

23rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of TestingWhiz is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional	1.0%
TestingWhiz	0.2%
Other	98.8%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vijay-Sawale

Test Associate & Manager at Opus Technologies

Low code features and good customization but needs more customer-requested features

We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation The organization was able to provide customers with business solutions by giving demos of various tools, assisting in securing…

Read full review

ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ

Chief Product Officer at Gradiant

Provides extensive extensions and plugins for seamless AI product development

Our primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional is as a development tool. We develop software primarily in Python, specifically for applications related to artificial intelligence. We use frameworks like PyTorch for training models and developing applications using these models. This tool…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"TestingWhiz is a low code, no code tool with integration facilities, such as with Jira, and can be used over the cloud."

"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."

"One of the best documentation in the world."

"The debugging feature is valuable."

"The interface is easy to use."

"Visual Studio is the easiest to use."

"Searching is extensive and helpful."

"The performance of Visual Studio Test Professional is valuable."

"The whole suite is made for .NET development."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available."

"The solution's deployment is not very easy and should be made easier."

"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."

"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."

"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."

"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."

"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."

"The price could be improved."

"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Users have to pay a licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

"We use the solution’s community version, and the solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is not an expensive solution."

"I positioned it at a mid-range level. It isn't an inexpensive solution, but considering its capabilities, it represents excellent value for the functionalities it offers."

"The tool is expensive in my region."

"It is a price-effective solution"

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very expensive solution."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestingWhiz?

It is cheaper compared to other tools. The tool is web-based with various licenses, including professional and enterprise editions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestingWhiz?

Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available. Additionally, there is a need to improve the handling of less critical issues which...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TestingWhiz?

We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation.

See all answers

What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?

The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface. Currently, I need to search online to find out how to use certain functions. This feature would save time by providing direct assi...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 21% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 17% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 14% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 12% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2025

Download TestingWhiz product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

September 2025

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Overview

TestingWhiz is a Codeless Automation Testing Tool for Software, Web, Mobile, Database, Cloud, Web Services and API testing. It is pillared on a strong architecture combined with intuitive Automation Engine and short learning curve that promises to take your test automation to the next level.

Cygnet.One

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Verizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.