No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Tenable Identity Exposure vs WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Tenable Identity Exposure
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
23rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Active Directory Management (12th)
WithSecure Elements Exposur...
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
27th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (78th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (37th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category, the mindshare of Tenable Identity Exposure is 1.0%. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) is 0.9%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tenable Identity Exposure1.0%
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM)0.9%
Other98.1%
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Alexandru Cioruta - PeerSpot reviewer
Global Cybersecurity Presales Domain Lead Architect at Eviden France
An easy-to-implement solution that provides good reporting features and protects users’ AD infrastructure
We use Tenable Identity Exposure for our customers who have legacy AD still in use to see any exposure and protect their AD infrastructure as much as possible The solution is easy to implement, and its reporting is great. From the start, you get to see the exposure of your AD. So, it doesn't need…
PP
System Specialist at Fix-Forum Oy
Stable, scalable, and can be deployed on both cloud and on-premises
We usually need the solution to have extra protection against data breaches, as we have seen with our customers. The solution is deployed on the public cloud The solution works both outside and on-premises of the company, thus preventing secondary breaches from reaching the company's data. The…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is easy to implement, and its reporting is great."
"The solution works both outside and on-premises of the company, thus preventing secondary breaches from reaching the company's data."
 

Cons

"Tenable Identity Exposure is more expensive than Defender for Identity."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The cost of the solution is mid-ranged but worth the price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.
894,998 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Teanble.ad
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Zafran Security, Pentera, XM Cyber and others in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). Updated: April 2026.
894,998 professionals have used our research since 2012.