


Symantec Endpoint Security and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security are competitors in the field of comprehensive endpoint protection solutions. Trend Vision One appears to have a competitive advantage due to its advanced capabilities in virtual patching and protection against zero-day vulnerabilities.
Features: Symantec Endpoint Security provides a robust set of features including anti-virus, anti-spyware, intrusion prevention, and ransomware protection. It is praised for its centralized management and strong security measures against network threats. Trend Vision One offers extensive features such as threat detection, ransomware protection, and advanced machine learning capabilities. Its virtual patching and XDR capabilities make it particularly effective against zero-day vulnerabilities.
Room for Improvement: Symantec Endpoint Security encounters challenges like high resource consumption, a complex management interface, and limited real-time updates, which affects user experience and system performance. It also struggles with mobile device integration and real-time threat remediation. Trend Vision One also faces issues with high resource usage during scans, limited reporting capabilities, and complex policy management, despite its flexibility and adaptability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Symantec and Trend Vision One offer on-premises and cloud deployment options. Symantec is noted for extensive on-premises deployments but criticized for complex installations and performance issues post-Broadcom acquisition. Its customer service has declined, with reports of slow response times. Trend Micro is acknowledged for its flexible deployment models, including public, private, and hybrid clouds, and is praised for its robust customer and technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Security is considered more costly than some competitors but offers competitive pricing for nonprofits. Its ROI is affected by high licensing costs. In contrast, Trend Vision One is competitively priced with various package options offering comprehensive features. Customers appreciate its thorough protection and ROI benefits through effective security management and threat reduction.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
I have seen a return on investment with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, as this product is offered at a minimal cost, and we can find a good ROI from it.
Symantec Endpoint Security filled gaps in our toolset, particularly with the ability to control network firewall on hosts remotely, which was greatly appreciated.
We have certainly seen the return on investment with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security given that endpoints are largely focused in terms of cyber attacks.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
In some cases, it rates as high as ten out of ten, while in others, it can be as low as eight.
There is no support in the German language, which is a problem for many public tenders.
Their technical support deserves a rating of nine out of ten.
we reached out to our local vendor in the country for questions, and they resolved these issues with Trend Micro.
We have a really good sales team to manage that and they have been really helpful in giving the proposal as well as the setup and fine-tuning cost every year over year, so that is taken care.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
I think scalability for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is good.
Symantec Endpoint Security is quite scalable, and it is very important for large clients.
The scalability of the servers is good, as it requires computational powers.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is scalable and stable because we have been using it for more than five years.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
I have encountered issues where I had to uninstall and reinstall the product on end users' computers to view the logs again.
Previously, we used to have multiple servers such as GUP servers and numerous servers for pushing updates, but we reduced it and transitioned almost 30,000 devices to CrowdStrike, which was easy to manage.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Device management is not very good and I am not enabling it in my organization due to security reasons.
I would like to see improvements in the scanning part of the solution, specifically to enhance the CPU and hard disk usage during scanning and updates to prevent disruption during work hours.
It is cumbersome to use, particularly in handling firewall management.
We need more training resources for my team and I, such as developing labs and sessions to implement it more easily.
20% to 30% of endpoints faced difficulty in cleaning or uninstalling the software.
It supports Mac and is fully functional with that.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
It seems to be half the cost or more affordable than other solutions.
The pricing is very low compared to other companies like SentinelOne and others.
I rate the pricing, setup cost, and licensing around nine out of ten.
The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.
Regarding the price, there was a tender, and Trend Micro won; the price was good.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
Symantec Endpoint Security offers great features such as reporting capabilities with a customized dashboard that pulls in EDR timelines, threat maps, and compliance metrics into one view.
Symantec Endpoint Security offers many valuable features, such as file explosion, application learning, DLP, injection detection, and EDR solutions for traffic control.
The incident response capabilities allow me to resolve authentication and support issues promptly, ensuring the system operates without downtime.
The integration of ML and AI provides complete visibility, suggests responses, detects threats, and includes integration into XDR, which covers email security, endpoint security, cloud security, among other aspects.
They are very aggressive for our program, so whenever we have any issue, we just lodge a call, and within 15 minutes, we get the engineer on a call or Webex call to resolve the issue for the solution.
The vulnerability protection module helps to identify which threat group is active and is using which specific vulnerability and also it helps to detect if those vulnerabilities exist within our environment and shows which machine is affected.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Trend Vision One Endpoint Security | 1.7% |
| Symantec Endpoint Security | 3.3% |
| Other | 91.6% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 69 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 63 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 45 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 60 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Symantec Endpoint Security is a robust and reliable product that provides complete protection against viruses, malware, Trojans, and malicious files. It offers application and device control, ease of use in deploying and updating, a central control console, stability, scalability, auto-discovery capabilities, patch management, endpoint detection and response capabilities, intrusion detection module.
The Symantec Global Intelligence Network (GIN) provides threat intelligence and detection across endpoints, email, and web traffic. It has helped organizations reduce downtime, increase productivity, and improve security posture. Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, has a flexible administration, and offers more value than expected.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security provides robust threat protection through features like a web console and real-time updates. It integrates seamlessly for comprehensive endpoint coverage.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers advanced threat detection and centralized management. It features machine learning and virtual patching to safeguard against both known and unknown threats. Users highlight its ability to secure multiple environments with ransomware protection and data loss prevention. Despite its strengths, improved Linux support and EDR features are needed. Connectivity issues with the firewall and a need for refined reporting are noted, alongside demands for better performance during updates.
What are the key features of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?Companies leverage Trend Vision One Endpoint Security in industries requiring strong data protection, such as healthcare and finance. It is deployed both on-premises and as a SaaS, integrating effortlessly with extensive networks for improved threat detection and device control. Its machine learning capabilities are particularly valued for handling diverse threat vectors efficiently.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.