We performed a comparison between Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization and Steelhead based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization."The platform’s features for latency mitigation help optimize user experience."
"I find the most valuable to be the compression and exchange replication."
"It is very easy to install the solution."
"Scalable data referencing is a great feature."
"The compression of Riverbed is very powerful. It can also handle large quantities of traffic."
"The most valuable feature of Steelhead is its optimization capabilities."
"Steelhead is stable, and it can even help you avoid service interruption in the event of a power outage. If your hardware fails, technical support will replace your device quickly."
"The connectivity to speed is the valuable feature."
"TCP optimization... caches a particular TCP connection and the next time a user uses that connection he will reach the destination easily."
"Currently, we encounter challenges in terms of the functioning of compression, deduplication, and other features even after uploading the certificate for encrypted traffic."
"One area for improvement is related to monitoring and visibility."
"I would like to see improvement in the solution’s configuration and protocol aspects. We have got some configurations that are not set. I would also like to simplify the call detection of some protocols."
"If we load a primary firewall, the secondary firewall usually handles all the active connections, but in Riverbed, this isn't the case. We lose all the active connections at the moment of failure."
"Steelhead's handling of encrypted traffic could be improved because it requires some complex configuration to optimize encrypted traffic, especially when working with Microsoft protocols for mail servers and VPN services"
"The solution needs to have alert notifications."
"The application response time of the solution can be improved."
"They should include a network switch in a future release."
"The product should offer more integration capabilities."
More Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is ranked 13th in WAN Optimization with 1 review while Steelhead is ranked 4th in WAN Optimization with 22 reviews. Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is rated 0.0, while Steelhead is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization writes "Easy-to-deploy with valuable features for web optimization ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Steelhead writes "Exceptionally stable and reliable but costly". Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is most compared with , whereas Steelhead is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform, WAAS, Citrix SD-WAN and Noction IRP.
See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.