No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

SAP SuccessFactors Learning vs uxpertise LMS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SAP SuccessFactors Learning
Ranking in Learning Management Systems (LMS)
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
uxpertise LMS
Ranking in Learning Management Systems (LMS)
123rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Learning Management Systems (LMS) category, the mindshare of SAP SuccessFactors Learning is 1.9%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of uxpertise LMS is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Learning Management Systems (LMS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SAP SuccessFactors Learning1.9%
uxpertise LMS0.5%
Other97.6%
Learning Management Systems (LMS)
 

Featured Reviews

Renelia Villanueva - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President & Group Head People & Workplace Management at PLDT Enterprise
Integrated employee data has improved HR coordination but reporting and interface still need work
The GUI of SAP SuccessFactors Learning is still not very good. The drop-downs are too limited. One thing I want to have is an advisory banner with highlighted font that employees can visibly see during login, but support indicated this cannot be done. I have already raised this request to the support team, and they mentioned that the same request has come from other companies.
Use uxpertise LMS?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Learning Management Systems (LMS) solutions are best for your needs.
899,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Construction Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise18
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP SuccessFactors Learning?
The pricing is pocket-friendly if you have more than five hundred users. I would rate the pricing seven out of ten as it can be expensive for less than five hundred users.
What needs improvement with SAP SuccessFactors Learning?
The GUI of SAP SuccessFactors Learning is still not very good. The drop-downs are too limited. One thing I want to have is an advisory banner with highlighted font that employees can visibly see du...
What is your primary use case for SAP SuccessFactors Learning?
Before joining HRIS, I worked in IT for more than ten years. We are using SAP SuccessFactors Learning for employee central, recruitment, goals, and performance. We were using HCM for time and payro...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Plateau, SuccessFactors Learning
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SHORE Solutions Inc., TranSystems Corporation, Day & Zimmerman, Serco Group, Harlequin Sales Corp, China DataCom Corporation, Sonova AG, Metropolitan Utilities District (M.U.D.)
1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Google 4. Amazon 5. Apple 6. Facebook 7. Adobe 8. Cisco 9. Oracle 10. Intel 11. HP 12. Dell 13. SAP 14. Salesforce 15. Accenture 16. Deloitte 17. PwC 18. Ernst & Young 19. KPMG 20. McKinsey & Company 21. JPMorgan Chase 22. Bank of America 23. Citigroup 24. Wells Fargo 25. Goldman Sachs 26. General Electric 27. General Motors 28. Ford 29. Coca-Cola 30. PepsiCo 31. Procter & Gamble 32. Walmart
Find out what your peers are saying about Moodle, CYPHER LEARNING, SAP and others in Learning Management Systems (LMS). Updated: June 2026.
899,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.