Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs SonicWall Capture Client comparison

Sangfor and SonicWall are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Sangfor is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.2, while SonicWall is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.0. Sangfor holds a 0.8% mindshare in EDR, compared to SonicWall’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sangfor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Read 11 Sangfor Endpoint Secure reviews

1,479 Views
600 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonicWall Capture Client

Read 9 SonicWall Capture Client reviews

1,178 Views
305 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

SonicWall Capture Client

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

SonicWall Capture Client and Sangfor Endpoint Secure compete in the endpoint protection solutions category. SonicWall Capture Client appears to have the upper hand in support and pricing, while Sangfor Endpoint Secure stands out with its comprehensive feature set.

Features: SonicWall Capture Client is known for its integration capabilities, comprehensive threat detection, and user-friendly interface. Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers advanced data encryption, detailed reporting, and deeper functionality in specific cybersecurity areas.

Room for Improvement: SonicWall Capture Client users mention the need for a more intuitive setup process, additional advanced features, and improved documentation. Sangfor Endpoint Secure users suggest enhancements in system resource consumption, faster customer support response times, and a more streamlined user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall Capture Client is generally easy to deploy with reliable customer service, though some users face minor setup frustrations. Sangfor Endpoint Secure has a straightforward deployment but mixed reviews regarding customer service response times. SonicWall has the upper hand in customer service, with comparable deployment ease for both.

Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Capture Client is cost-effective with satisfactory ROI, while Sangfor Endpoint Secure is pricier but delivers excellent ROI due to its comprehensive features. Users find Sangfor’s advanced feature set justifies its higher initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. SonicWall Capture Client

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,278 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonicWall Capture Client

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

39th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (47th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Shiraz Ali

Networking Solutions Specialist at GBM

Provides a unified and multi-layer security solution

I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities. Having a single, more user-friendly management console, like a one-window approach, would streamline the user experience and make it easier for administrators to handle security tasks more efficiently. Sangfor Endpoint Secure currently only allows one manager to control clients, and it lacks a backup system. It would be better if it supported a secondary manager for backup in case the primary one fails, ensuring uninterrupted service.

Read full review

Jasmit Singh Juneja

CEO & Technology Specialist at Karman Infotech Private Limited

A stable solution that is used for endpoint security and to protect computers from malware

We are using the latest version of SonicWall Capture Client. Fortinet is ahead of SonicWall. The range of appliances, equipment, availability in my country with the distributors, and the overall ecosystem of Fortinet is way better than SonicWall. My advice to others looking into using SonicWall Capture Client is to keep giving feedback to the companies regarding whatever improvements should be made. Overall, I rate SonicWall Capture Client an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable features are control access, endpoint security, and load balancing of ISPs."

"The real-time monitoring feature of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is truly real-time, with no delay compared to other solutions."

"What stands out to me is the dual-end user interface they provide."

"It has a quick response time, threat intelligence, cybersecurity features, quick report generation, behavior analysis, dynamic detection, and quarantine features."

"We use the product for network protection from any malicious threat."

"I like the tool's honeypot feature. Some features include having a honeypot to detect attacks in a certain area. Additionally, there is RDP protection, which means that when we remote into our server or any endpoint, we must enter a password as a second layer of security. It can also integrate with next-generation firewalls."

"The most valuable feature I have found in the system is its comprehensive end-to-end protection."

"The tool's AI feature is helpful in endpoint security."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure pros

"The threat protection feature of SonicWall Capture Client is most valuable."

"SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The product’s interface is easy to use."

"SonicWall Capture Client has a serial number to connect to your firewall."

"SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice."

"The solution serves as a very stable platform."

"Overall, what I love the most about SonicWall Capture Client is its management console. SonicWall Capture Client also has the intelligence to tell you which computer is online, what OS it uses, etc. I also found the rollback feature and SentinelOne integration valuable in SonicWall Capture Client. Rollback is a powerful feature of the solution because it's similar to locking your endpoint during an attack, so you won't have to pay the hackers, particularly during ransomware attacks. That feature in SonicWall Capture Client allows you to get back your endpoint or make your endpoint right again after an attack. I also like that it isn't complex to remove the engine error from the endpoint because you only have to provide the security key from SonicWall Capture Client, so the process is simple. It's not complex."

More SonicWall Capture Client pros

Cons

"When an issue occurs, the response time for first-level support and the time taken for meetings could be improved."

"It would be much more convenient if the migration tool could be installed directly on the customer's VMs, enabling a smoother migration process to the new infrastructure, with potential restrictions addressed accordingly."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure performs poorly."

"There are a few areas for improvement. We have encountered licensing issues on occasion, and sometimes updates don't apply properly."

"I face issues while migrating from Kaspersky to Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

"I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure should include healing capabilities."

"Currently, the tool lacks reporting functionalities."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure cons

"It takes technical support too long to resolve an issue."

"The implementation is not easy."

"They should improve their user interface."

"SonicWall Capture Client could be made a little lighter than it currently is in terms of memory consumption."

"The vulnerability reports need to be better. Windows Defender detected some issues that SonicWall Capture Client couldn't."

"Technical support from SonicWall has room for improvement. While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels."

"SonicWall Capture Client should use less of our PC's memory, as it tends to slow down the performance."

"The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency."

More SonicWall Capture Client cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We were using Hyper-V. So, we switched to Sangfor because of the pricing."

"Price-wise, Sangfor Endpoint Secure can be considered a competitively priced product in the market as it offers quite low prices compared to other solutions."

"The solution is cheap. It is cheaper than other products by 15-20 percent."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure's pricing is cheap. I rate it seven out of ten."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure is not a cheap solution."

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"Its "pay as you grow" model offers cost-effectiveness compared to major cloud providers."

"You have to pay for the solution, and a lot of customers do not want to pay."

"Here in Indonesia, SonicWall Capture Client costs five hundred thousand rupiahs for every endpoint. If I'm correct, you only have to pay the licensing fee, and there's no additional fee. To me, the pricing for SonicWall Capture Client is four out of five."

"The product is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,278 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

11%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered. It would be better if it were a simplified version with fewer buttons and a more consolidated layout.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is easy to handle with its user-friendly interface. The four engines it utilizes for endpoint detection provide fewer false positives compared to other solutions. It is used...

See all answers

What do you like most about SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client could benefit from an improved graphical user interface with more modern and minimal icons. Additionally, one of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier lic...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 23% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 12% of the time

ESET Inspect vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 9% of the time

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 8% of the time

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 20% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 17% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 8% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 7% of the time

More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

May 2025

Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

June 2025

Download SonicWall Capture Client product report

Overview

Organizations use Sangfor Endpoint Secure for endpoint protection and security management, managing devices, servers, and networks against malicious threats. It also assists in blocking websites, managing infrastructure, applications, antivirus needs, and aids in migrating to cloud environments.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers end-to-end protection, incorporating file protection, AI detection, behavior analysis, access control, and ISP load balancing. It facilitates VM migration with minimal downtime and includes a dual-end user interface for creating firewall rules, uploading images, and configuring VM settings. Enhancements such as Hyper-V capabilities, policy certificates, honeypot features, and next-generation firewall integrations are available. However, Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve on console management, reporting functionalities, public cloud migration support, navigation, VPN system issues, licensing, update management, transitioning processes, and incorporating healing capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Comprehensive end-to-end protection including file protection
AI detection and behavior analysis
Access control and ISP load balancing
Ease of VM migration with minimal downtime
Streamlined dual-end user interface for firewall rules and VM settings
Hyper-V capabilities and policy certificates
Honeypot feature for attack detection and RDP protection
Integration with next-generation firewalls

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced device, server, and network security from malicious threats
Simplified migration from on-premises to cloud environments
User-friendly navigation and management capabilities
Advanced detection and behavior analysis reducing potential threats
Streamlined enforcement of robust security policies

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is implemented across various industries to ensure comprehensive security management and protection. IT departments leverage its VM migration capabilities for seamless transitions to cloud environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure sensitive patient data, while educational institutions utilize it for safeguarding academic records and personal information. Financial services employ it to protect critical transactional data and adhere to stringent compliance requirements.

Sangfor

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Luton College

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. SonicWall Capture Client

April 2025

Free Report: Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. SonicWall Capture Client

Find out what your peers are saying about Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. SonicWall Capture Client and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,278 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. SonicWall Capture Client report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.