Fortinet FortiWeb vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Fortinet and Wallarm are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Fortinet is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Wallarm is ranked #39. Fortinet holds a 3.9% mindshare in WAF, compared to Wallarm’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiWeb

Read 122 Fortinet FortiWeb reviews

13,738 Views
10,990 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

2,492 Views
1,744 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiWeb

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Fortinet FortiWeb and Wallarm NG WAF are competitors in the web application firewall market, with Wallarm NG WAF gaining a slight advantage due to its advanced features like AI-based threat detection and seamless DevOps integration.

Features: Fortinet FortiWeb provides protection against known vulnerabilities, dynamic signature updates, and load balancing capabilities. Wallarm NG WAF offers AI-based threat detection, integration with DevOps tools, and real-time traffic analysis, making it more advanced in attack handling.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiWeb could improve its AI capabilities and simplicity in deployment. It lacks seamless cloud integration and might require more automation for real-time threat detection. Wallarm NG WAF could enhance its reporting features and customer training resources. It might also work on expanding its integration capabilities with third-party applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wallarm NG WAF is deployed using a straightforward cloud-based model, offering flexibility and exceptional customer support. Fortinet FortiWeb, by contrast, requires a more complex on-premises setup, demanding technical proficiency for effective deployment and maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiWeb is known for attractive initial pricing, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. Nonetheless, Wallarm NG WAF provides better long-term ROI due to its comprehensive feature set and reduced operational expenses, offsetting the initial investment through value delivery over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiWeb

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

122

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiWeb is 3.9%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiWeb	3.9%
Wallarm NG WAF	1.2%
Other	94.9%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

HameedAhmed

Joint Director at PAA

Security threats have been reduced through seamless deployment and strong integration with other tools

I have used Fortinet FortiWeb's integration features. We have easily integrated all of the applications with the product. Most of the applications we are using are in-house built. My technical team is looking after the best features. I have not used it extensively for maybe two and a half years. I have been involved in the installation, but I am not actually using the product. I work with it from time to time but not extensively. I would assess Fortinet FortiWeb's adaptive machine learning and artificial intelligence as having new patches installed regarding artificial intelligence, but when we bought it, I think the learning feature was there. Now they have installed artificial intelligence features through patches. We have a complete portfolio of Fortinet in our organization, including FortiMail, Fortinet FortiWeb, and FortiGate, along with multi-factor authentication. All of the products are from Fortinet. Fortinet tools integrate with each other and work in conjunction. I think Fortinet FortiWeb has helped us meet regulatory compliance because we are not a regulatory organization, but our sister organization is regulatory. We have regulatory compliance with the International Civil Aviation Authority, whose audit teams have checked our data center and these security products, and they are satisfied with us. The question about leveraging Fortinet FortiWeb's automated policy management does not pertain to my domain because I am not so technical, but I am in a management role now. My engineer is more technical than me. I would rate this product an eight point five out of ten.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Peace of mind web site protection"

"It is an easy-to-manage, great product for a small office."

"It's the extra security that is the most valuable feature; you have insight into your traffic, there are some great insights into what utilities hackers are trying to exploit, and it blocks a lot of stuff from the internet."

"If your goal is security, FortiWeb is your best choice."

"The initial setup was straightforward, and it takes less time to deploy compared with other competitors."

"I think FortiWeb is the best WAF in terms of cost/benefit."

"FortiGate is a stable product."

"Fortinet is a great SD-WAN player when it comes to security capabilities."

More Fortinet FortiWeb pros

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

"They are the only solution that fits our success criteria and business objectives: WAF must have a low (<5%) false negative rate and be ready to protect from all well-known web attacks."

"Perimeter control and active vulnerability scanner are the most valuable features."

"Vulnerability scanner and WAF are valuable features."

"The most powerful feature is the ability to first learn what type of query to make to your web application when it is attacked and what type of query creates a false positive to your app."

"With active threat detection, we are no longer over-swamped with tons of useless events."

Cons

"Centralized management of multiple devices, and GUI improvement, could reduce the learning curve."

"I would like to see the Application Delivery Control (ADC) and Web Application Firewall (WAF) combined in one device."

"No solution is 100% secure and the security could always be worked on."

"We also need configuration settings that indicate the advantages or disadvantages of enabled features."

"The integration with other products should be improved."

"The initial setup process could be improved."

"For users not familiar with Fortinet, it could be beneficial to provide more user-friendly analytics and reporting."

"If the price was lower, it would be a bit more attractive, as an option, to the customers."

More Fortinet FortiWeb cons

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

"Wallarm uses a learning mechanism to detect attacks and to avoid false positives. If Wallarm blocks some illegitimate request, then you can go to the management console and mark this request as false positive, but sometimes this does not work properly."

"It needs more customization in PDF reports."

"Technical support is 6 or 7 out of 10. Sometimes we have had trouble with communication and understanding."

"There were several stability issues during the first pilot."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheaper compared with other solutions. It has a yearly license."

"Its subscription prices are cheaper, and it is not very expensive. From a price perspective, Fortinet is a very well-known security vendor. Subscriptions are very simple. They have a couple of licenses on an appliance, and that's it. The cost is not that big. One license is 40K, which they give with all the products. Another one includes the subscriptions for threat prevention, IPS, sandboxing, etc, which is more than enough."

"The solution is very inexpensive when compared to F5 Advanced WAF and Avi Networks but offers the same benefits."

"All our Fortinet pricing is bundled together for different products, like FortiGate, FortiAnalyzer, and FortiWeb. FortiWeb, by itself, is probably around $2,500 to $3,500."

"The pricing is average; the product is neither particularly expensive nor affordable."

"It is fine now. We had to earlier negotiate the price."

"FortiWeb Web Application Firewall is not expensive."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

More Fortinet FortiWeb pricing and cost advice

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

21%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	61
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	37

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiWeb?

The pricing for Fortinet FortiWeb varies with different models having different prices. It depends on the requirement. For VM machines, the price increases based on CPU configurations of 2, 4, or 8...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiWeb?

There is room for improvement in Fortinet FortiWeb. The team was only from FortiGate itself. They are making new firmware versions and releasing them before checking, which leads to many bugs in th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiWeb?

Fortinet FortiWeb is very good as a web application solution. I have been working with Fortinet FortiWeb since 2020.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

F5 Advanced WAF vs Fortinet FortiWeb

Compared 9% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Fortinet FortiWeb

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiAppSec Cloud vs Fortinet FortiWeb

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Fortinet FortiWeb

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Fortinet FortiWeb

Compared 4% of the time

More Fortinet FortiWeb Competitors

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Salt Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 11% of the time

Venusense Web Application Firewall vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudflare vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 4% of the time

More Wallarm NG WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiWeb

November 2026

Download Fortinet FortiWeb product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

November 2026

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

Fortinet FortiWeb provides advanced web application protection, using AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration with Fortinet products, ensuring robust security and easy management. It's favored for its scalability in protecting websites, mobile apps, and APIs from threats like SQL injection.

Fortinet FortiWeb offers robust web application security with features like machine learning-driven threat detection, load balancing, and OWASP protection. Its comprehensive security measures include web traffic filtering and DDoS protection, making it ideal for securing APIs and web servers. Cost-effectiveness and easy deployment further enhance its appeal as it serves banking, e-commerce, and industrial sectors. Areas needing enhancement include load balancing capabilities, comprehensive documentation, and improved support response times, addressing user-reported issues such as false positives and integration challenges. Documentation for cloud deployment is crucial for enhanced logging and performance stability.

What are Fortinet FortiWeb's Key Features?

Machine Learning: Detects threats using advanced algorithms.
AI-Driven Threat Detection: Provides automated responses to vulnerabilities.
Load Balancing: Distributes traffic across servers for efficiency.
Anti-Defacement: Protects websites from unauthorized alterations.
OWASP Protection: Guards against common web security vulnerabilities.

Why Consider Fortinet FortiWeb for Web Security?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides affordable security solutions.
Reliability: Offers consistent performance in threat protection.
Easy Deployment: Simplifies the integration process into existing systems.
Robust Security: Delivers comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Integration: Ensures compatibility with Fortinet's broader security ecosystem.

Companies across banking, e-commerce, and financial sectors implement Fortinet FortiWeb for its comprehensive security features in protecting web applications from SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its use as a web application firewall provides essential protection and load-balancing capabilities, ensuring compliance with standards like PCI DSS in cloud environments and industrial settings.

Fortinet

Wallarm NG WAF offers robust web application security by integrating machine learning to tackle complex cybersecurity challenges. Its advanced threat detection makes it a top choice in safeguarding data.

Wallarm NG WAF focuses on an adaptive approach to securing web applications utilizing AI-driven insights to identify, detect, and mitigate threats in real-time. Tailored for developers and security teams, it simplifies management while enhancing application resilience against attacks. As cyber threats evolve, Wallarm NG WAF ensures protection by learning from each encounter, optimizing security protocols.

What are Wallarm NG WAF's key features?

Real-time Threat Detection: Uses AI to recognize and respond to potential threats instantly.
API Security: Specializes in protecting APIs against common vulnerabilities.
Scalable Architecture: Supports growth and adapts to increased traffic without compromising security.
Integration Flexibility: Compatible with modern DevOps processes and tools for seamless implementation.

Which benefits should users evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Provides comprehensive security measures against evolving threats.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces the cost of managing a dedicated security infrastructure.
Reduced False Positives: Smart algorithms decrease the chances of false alerts.
Operational Efficiency: Automation minimizes manual oversight efforts.

Wallarm NG WAF is employed in industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce where data protection is crucial. It is integrated to protect customer data and ensure compliance with specific industry regulations, providing a reliable web application security layer.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

Lush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF

November 2026

Free Report: Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.