Fortinet FortiWeb vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Fortinet and Wallarm are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Fortinet is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Wallarm is ranked #39. Fortinet holds a 4.1% mindshare in WAF, compared to Wallarm’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiWeb

Read 122 Fortinet FortiWeb reviews

12,763 Views
10,083 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

2,103 Views
1,430 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiWeb

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Fortinet FortiWeb and Wallarm NG WAF are competitors in the web application firewall market, with Wallarm NG WAF gaining a slight advantage due to its advanced features like AI-based threat detection and seamless DevOps integration.

Features: Fortinet FortiWeb provides protection against known vulnerabilities, dynamic signature updates, and load balancing capabilities. Wallarm NG WAF offers AI-based threat detection, integration with DevOps tools, and real-time traffic analysis, making it more advanced in attack handling.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiWeb could improve its AI capabilities and simplicity in deployment. It lacks seamless cloud integration and might require more automation for real-time threat detection. Wallarm NG WAF could enhance its reporting features and customer training resources. It might also work on expanding its integration capabilities with third-party applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wallarm NG WAF is deployed using a straightforward cloud-based model, offering flexibility and exceptional customer support. Fortinet FortiWeb, by contrast, requires a more complex on-premises setup, demanding technical proficiency for effective deployment and maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiWeb is known for attractive initial pricing, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. Nonetheless, Wallarm NG WAF provides better long-term ROI due to its comprehensive feature set and reduced operational expenses, offsetting the initial investment through value delivery over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,262 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiWeb

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

122

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiWeb is 4.1%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiWeb	4.1%
Wallarm NG WAF	1.1%
Other	94.8%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

HameedAhmed

Joint Director at PAA

Security threats have been reduced through seamless deployment and strong integration with other tools

I have used Fortinet FortiWeb's integration features. We have easily integrated all of the applications with the product. Most of the applications we are using are in-house built. My technical team is looking after the best features. I have not used it extensively for maybe two and a half years. I have been involved in the installation, but I am not actually using the product. I work with it from time to time but not extensively. I would assess Fortinet FortiWeb's adaptive machine learning and artificial intelligence as having new patches installed regarding artificial intelligence, but when we bought it, I think the learning feature was there. Now they have installed artificial intelligence features through patches. We have a complete portfolio of Fortinet in our organization, including FortiMail, Fortinet FortiWeb, and FortiGate, along with multi-factor authentication. All of the products are from Fortinet. Fortinet tools integrate with each other and work in conjunction. I think Fortinet FortiWeb has helped us meet regulatory compliance because we are not a regulatory organization, but our sister organization is regulatory. We have regulatory compliance with the International Civil Aviation Authority, whose audit teams have checked our data center and these security products, and they are satisfied with us. The question about leveraging Fortinet FortiWeb's automated policy management does not pertain to my domain because I am not so technical, but I am in a management role now. My engineer is more technical than me. I would rate this product an eight point five out of ten.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If I need something from tech support, I can get it answered within the hour."

"Its stability is fine wherever we have implemented it."

"The most valuable feature is the tool's integration with load-balancing applications, similar to FortiADC. Its importance depends on customer requirements, such as whether they prioritize application load balancing or layer seven protection."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is Fail-Open."

"The solution has a very simple deployment."

"Other than the additional security with exploit protection, we have simpler certificate handling, as we can keep internal servers using internal certificates continuously distributed and updated by Active Directory Group Policy, while the public certificates become updated only in a single place, FortiWeb itself."

"The policies and the filtering are the most valuable features, especially traffic, URL, and application filtering. The solution is excellent at detecting vulnerabilities."

More Fortinet FortiWeb pros

"Vulnerability scanner and WAF are valuable features."

"They are the only solution that fits our success criteria and business objectives: WAF must have a low (<5%) false negative rate and be ready to protect from all well-known web attacks."

"The most powerful feature is the ability to first learn what type of query to make to your web application when it is attacked and what type of query creates a false positive to your app."

"With active threat detection, we are no longer over-swamped with tons of useless events."

"Perimeter control and active vulnerability scanner are the most valuable features."

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

Cons

"Maybe the load balancing options could be enhanced."

"The solution currently lacks a VM demo to enable testing prior to purchasing."

"We also need configuration settings that indicate the advantages or disadvantages of enabled features."

"When we look at the incident reports in the dashboard, they are available for a maximum duration of 24 hours. They should provide more time for the analysis and increase the duration of the availability of these reports. Currently, it gives the options for 5 minutes, 1 hour, and 24 hours. It would be excellent if there are more options for a longer time period. It may be configurable, but I don't know how to do it."

"The support side of things can be improved."

"The solution is a bit expensive when compared to other products."

"The product’s stability could be improved."

"We had some trouble using some features."

More Fortinet FortiWeb cons

"It needs more customization in PDF reports."

"There were several stability issues during the first pilot."

"Wallarm uses a learning mechanism to detect attacks and to avoid false positives. If Wallarm blocks some illegitimate request, then you can go to the management console and mark this request as false positive, but sometimes this does not work properly."

"Technical support is 6 or 7 out of 10. Sometimes we have had trouble with communication and understanding."

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FortiWeb Web Application Firewall is not expensive."

"The pricing is average; the product is neither particularly expensive nor affordable."

"The price of Fortinet FortiWeb is expensive in our Ethiopian currency."

"The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten."

"The solution gives us the best price to performance ratio."

"I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price."

"Cheaper than others."

"The pricing is in the middle. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It feels like a justified cost for the features."

More Fortinet FortiWeb pricing and cost advice

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	61
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	37

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiWeb?

The pricing for Fortinet FortiWeb varies with different models having different prices. It depends on the requirement. For VM machines, the price increases based on CPU configurations of 2, 4, or 8...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiWeb?

There is room for improvement in Fortinet FortiWeb. The team was only from FortiGate itself. They are making new firmware versions and releasing them before checking, which leads to many bugs in th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiWeb?

Fortinet FortiWeb is very good as a web application solution. I have been working with Fortinet FortiWeb since 2020.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

F5 Advanced WAF vs Fortinet FortiWeb

Compared 10% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Fortinet FortiWeb

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiAppSec Cloud vs Fortinet FortiWeb

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Fortinet FortiWeb

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Fortinet FortiWeb

Compared 4% of the time

More Fortinet FortiWeb Competitors

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Salt Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

Venusense Web Application Firewall vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudflare vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 5% of the time

Akamai API Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 4% of the time

More Wallarm NG WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiWeb

September 2026

Download Fortinet FortiWeb product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

September 2026

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

Fortinet FortiWeb provides advanced web application protection, using AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration with Fortinet products, ensuring robust security and easy management. It's favored for its scalability in protecting websites, mobile apps, and APIs from threats like SQL injection.

Fortinet FortiWeb offers robust web application security with features like machine learning-driven threat detection, load balancing, and OWASP protection. Its comprehensive security measures include web traffic filtering and DDoS protection, making it ideal for securing APIs and web servers. Cost-effectiveness and easy deployment further enhance its appeal as it serves banking, e-commerce, and industrial sectors. Areas needing enhancement include load balancing capabilities, comprehensive documentation, and improved support response times, addressing user-reported issues such as false positives and integration challenges. Documentation for cloud deployment is crucial for enhanced logging and performance stability.

What are Fortinet FortiWeb's Key Features?

Machine Learning: Detects threats using advanced algorithms.
AI-Driven Threat Detection: Provides automated responses to vulnerabilities.
Load Balancing: Distributes traffic across servers for efficiency.
Anti-Defacement: Protects websites from unauthorized alterations.
OWASP Protection: Guards against common web security vulnerabilities.

Why Consider Fortinet FortiWeb for Web Security?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides affordable security solutions.
Reliability: Offers consistent performance in threat protection.
Easy Deployment: Simplifies the integration process into existing systems.
Robust Security: Delivers comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Integration: Ensures compatibility with Fortinet's broader security ecosystem.

Companies across banking, e-commerce, and financial sectors implement Fortinet FortiWeb for its comprehensive security features in protecting web applications from SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its use as a web application firewall provides essential protection and load-balancing capabilities, ensuring compliance with standards like PCI DSS in cloud environments and industrial settings.

Fortinet

Wallarm NG WAF provides advanced security by integrating machine learning, making it essential for modern web applications. It offers protection against sophisticated threats and automates many processes.

Wallarm NG WAF leverages AI-driven technology to deliver robust security measures. It helps in defending web applications from cybersecurity threats with enhanced threat detection and response capabilities. Beyond vulnerability insights, Wallarm enhances security protocols, scales with growing online demands, and ensures comprehensive threat coverage, fostering a safer web environment.

What are the key features of Wallarm NG WAF?

AI-Powered Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates sophisticated attacks efficiently.
Automated Security Updates: Continuously updates defense strategies without manual intervention.
Flexible Deployment: Easily integrates across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid setups.
Scalability: Adapts to growing traffic volumes with consistent protection.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive analytics on web security posture.

What benefits can users expect from Wallarm NG WAF?

Increased Security: Enhances threat detection and reduces vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual intervention with automated tasks.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes security expenditure by preventing potential breaches.
Time Savings: Automates repetitive actions, saving valuable time for IT teams.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and healthcare, Wallarm NG WAF is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with stringent security standards. Its adaptability allows it to meet industry-specific requirements, offering specialized configurations tailored to each sector's unique demands.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

Lush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF

September 2026

Free Report: Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.