Radware Alteon vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Radware and Wallarm are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Radware is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0, while Wallarm is ranked #39. Radware holds a 1.8% mindshare in WAF, compared to Wallarm’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Radware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

Radware Alteon

Read 49 Radware Alteon reviews

6,599 Views
3,959 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

2,263 Views
1,584 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Radware Alteon

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Radware Alteon and Wallarm NG WAF compete in the web application security market. Radware Alteon has the advantage in terms of ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, whereas Wallarm NG WAF excels in AI-driven threat detection capabilities and offers a higher ROI through advanced security functionalities.

Features: Radware Alteon provides comprehensive traffic management, SSL inspection, DDoS attack prevention, advanced load balancing, and integrated application protection. Wallarm NG WAF offers AI-powered threat detection, real-time API security, low false positive rates, active threat detection, and automated security features.

Room for Improvement: Radware Alteon could enhance its AI-driven threat detection, streamline automated security features, and improve real-time API security. Wallarm NG WAF can work on simplifying deployment for less specialized teams, lowering the price point, and expanding technical support resources for more accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Radware Alteon offers a streamlined deployment process with extensive support resources, making it user-friendly for broader IT teams. Wallarm NG WAF, while flexible in deployment models, might require more specialized knowledge but compensates with strong post-deployment support catered to complex security needs.

Pricing and ROI: Radware Alteon is known for competitive pricing and extended customer service packages, delivering long-term value. Wallarm NG WAF, positioned at a higher price, offers advanced threat protection features, resulting in significant security efficiency gains, aiming for high returns through specialized and innovative security measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Radware Alteon vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Radware Alteon vs. Wallarm NG WAF

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Radware Alteon

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (5th)

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Radware Alteon is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Radware Alteon	1.8%
Wallarm NG WAF	1.1%
Other	97.1%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

RaynielBadiola

Technical Director at Secur Links

Load balancing has simplified deployments and improves application performance monitoring

I don't think of features that will make Radware Alteon better because it is already better, but to be able to compete also with other competitors, the price is something to consider. It is not actually that expensive, but for their level, there are other load balancers with the same feature, but they have a lower price, so pricing is the only point I can give. In the future, I would like to see some other security features added, such as DDoS, which is Distributed Denial of Service. Currently, it has the Web Application Firewall feature, but in the future, they can also add a DDoS feature or a more in-depth DDoS feature.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If someone wants an effective product with good capabilities, they should consider this solution."

"The best features are the security through the web application firewall, the functionality that the solution offers, being a load balancer with the security functionality on top of it, and the ease of administration."

"The device blocks threats and allows legitimate users to work correctly."

"My experience with technical support is that they were great."

"The most valuable aspect is that it establishes user security."

"The best feature of Radware Alteon is basically the configuration; how we configure it is very straightforward, and it is very simple to configure."

"I like how easy it is to create policies in Alteon. Debugging and SSL offloading are also simple, and the global load-balancing part is good. Load-balancing and SSL offloading are the two features that ensure your virtual services work perfectly."

"With Alteon, the load-balancing options are practically unlimited. We haven't had any issues with offloading, decryption, putting in cookies, or any other load-balancing features. We can check URLs, etc., on the back end for load balancing instead of running a TCP check. We're also doing some certificate stuff on there. Alteon covers all of the standard load-balancing techniques, and we employ most of them daily."

More Radware Alteon pros

"The most powerful feature is the ability to first learn what type of query to make to your web application when it is attacked and what type of query creates a false positive to your app."

"Perimeter control and active vulnerability scanner are the most valuable features."

"With active threat detection, we are no longer over-swamped with tons of useless events."

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

"They are the only solution that fits our success criteria and business objectives: WAF must have a low (<5%) false negative rate and be ready to protect from all well-known web attacks."

"Vulnerability scanner and WAF are valuable features."

Cons

"Alteon's user interface could be improved. F5's user interface is more user-friendly than Radware's, but Radware's hardware performs better."

"The reverse proxy piece is a little bit complicated. If the reverse proxy were easier to implement, that would help."

"Performance could be improved."

"Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers."

"We are having a difficult time with the security module, and how to implement the Radware security."

"The community portal does not have a place to find scripts."

"I would like the solution to display and help visualize the reference map more easily. I would also like to better understand where queries come from and know which users are consulting the application, along with which app."

"Radware LinkProof's marketing efforts need improvement to raise awareness about its capabilities and compete effectively in the market."

More Radware Alteon cons

"Wallarm uses a learning mechanism to detect attacks and to avoid false positives. If Wallarm blocks some illegitimate request, then you can go to the management console and mark this request as false positive, but sometimes this does not work properly."

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

"It needs more customization in PDF reports."

"Technical support is 6 or 7 out of 10. Sometimes we have had trouble with communication and understanding."

"There were several stability issues during the first pilot."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a good price point and is more reasonable than other comparable products"

"Our government agency opted for Radware Alteon due to its affordability and efficiency. While I can't say precisely how much it costs the organization, the price per device. In India, we always look for affordable products, so I assume Alteon is cost-effective because the government chose it."

"We have three-year contract with Radware. It is beneficial to have a longer-term contract because you can obtain more discounts. It seems to be a much cheaper alternative."

"I'm content with Alteon's pricing."

"The pricing is better than the competition. It is getting more pricey as the years go on, as more people are migrating to it, and as the technology gets better."

"It is not the priciest and it is not the cheapest. For our solution, it was right in the middle of price performance."

"Its pricing is very good. It is very competitive. Radware Alteon is the leader in the market. At a lesser price, we get a good product and also good support. Other vendors who are providing load balancers charge separately for two items. You have the hardware cost, and you have the support cost, whereas, in the case of Radware, you get both in a single package."

"Price-wise, the solution is a reasonable one."

More Radware Alteon pricing and cost advice

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	22

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Radware AppWall?

There is room for improvement in reducing the number of false positives I receive. We could benefit from more configuration options to avoid these false positives, which can be overwhelming for a s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Radware AppWall?

We are a system integrator company in the Philippines, and we are selling Radware Alteon product. Radware Alteon is usually used for a load balancer, so either a server load balancer or a link load...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Radware AppWall?

I would rate Alteon nine out of ten. The main reason I would recommend it is Radware's excellent support. I rate the overall solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Radware Alteon

Compared 11% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Radware Alteon

Compared 9% of the time

NetScaler vs Radware Alteon

Compared 8% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Radware Alteon

Compared 6% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Radware Alteon

Compared 5% of the time

More Radware Alteon Competitors

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Salt Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

Venusense Web Application Firewall vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudflare vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 5% of the time

Cequence Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 5% of the time

More Wallarm NG WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Radware Alteon

September 2026

Download Radware Alteon product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

October 2026

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

Alteon, Radware AppWall

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

Radware Alteon is an advanced network solution offering exceptional load balancing, SSL offloading, and integrated application protection. Its high performance and user-friendly interface make it ideal for enhancing server capacity and reliability in demanding environments.

Radware Alteon enhances performance with robust load balancing, SSL-TLS acceleration, and comprehensive security features. Its automated threat detection and real-time analytics provide crucial insights and mitigation within high-demand scenarios. Users benefit from seamless server and application traffic management along with web application firewall capabilities, ensuring high availability and compliance with security standards. Scalability is supported through strong hardware and ease of integration, although improvements are needed in cloud service automation and interface simplicity. Challenges include response times and live traffic monitoring, with limited resources in support and documentation. Scalability faces constraints due to throughput limitations.

What are the key features of Radware Alteon?

Load Balancing: Optimizes traffic distribution across servers to enhance performance.
SSL Offloading: Alleviates pressure on servers via SSL-TLS acceleration and certificate management.
Application Protection: Integrates security measures to safeguard applications effectively.
Threat Detection: Automates identification of threats to ensure immediate action.
Real-time Analytics: Provides insights into network performance and security status.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

High Availability: Reliable load management ensures consistent service uptime.
Scalability: Supports network growth efficiently with robust hardware capabilities.
Performance Efficiency: Enhances server functionality by offloading intensive tasks like SSL processing.
Enhanced Security: Protects applications with integrated security features, reducing vulnerabilities.

Radware Alteon is crucial for industries requiring reliable load balancing across multiple servers and applications. It supports inbound and outbound traffic management, focusing on web application protection and data center security. Businesses in telecommunications, finance, and retail utilize its capabilities for server and link balancing, ensuring adherence to strict security standards with seamless functionality across diverse network environments.

Radware

Wallarm NG WAF provides advanced security by integrating machine learning, making it essential for modern web applications. It offers protection against sophisticated threats and automates many processes.

Wallarm NG WAF leverages AI-driven technology to deliver robust security measures. It helps in defending web applications from cybersecurity threats with enhanced threat detection and response capabilities. Beyond vulnerability insights, Wallarm enhances security protocols, scales with growing online demands, and ensures comprehensive threat coverage, fostering a safer web environment.

What are the key features of Wallarm NG WAF?

AI-Powered Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates sophisticated attacks efficiently.
Automated Security Updates: Continuously updates defense strategies without manual intervention.
Flexible Deployment: Easily integrates across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid setups.
Scalability: Adapts to growing traffic volumes with consistent protection.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive analytics on web security posture.

What benefits can users expect from Wallarm NG WAF?

Increased Security: Enhances threat detection and reduces vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual intervention with automated tasks.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes security expenditure by preventing potential breaches.
Time Savings: Automates repetitive actions, saving valuable time for IT teams.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and healthcare, Wallarm NG WAF is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with stringent security standards. Its adaptability allows it to meet industry-specific requirements, offering specialized configurations tailored to each sector's unique demands.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

Convergys

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

Radware Alteon vs. Wallarm NG WAF

September 2026

Free Report: Radware Alteon vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about Radware Alteon vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Radware Alteon vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.