We performed a comparison between Radware Alteon and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The best features are the security through the web application firewall, the functionality that the solution offers, being a load balancer with the security functionality on top of it, and the ease of administration."
"The command line interface is simple and very user-friendly."
"I like the web GUI. It's very intuitive and easy to use."
"The device blocks threats and allows legitimate users to work correctly."
"The integrated application protection provided by Alteon is very good. It really helps to avoid false positives in some cases. It provides important granularity to avoid a situation in which security or cybersecurity scenarios escape us."
"The strength of this solution is the application delivery controller."
"Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure."
"Radware has been characterized by being extremely robust. This gives us the confidence to offer our users a continuous service."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"I would like to see the loading documentation improved."
"The solution could be more robust."
"We are in the process of updating our version of the solution, so judging what should be improved is difficult. But in some cases, the visualization takes a while, especially for mapping issues."
"We don't integrate anything with it because most things don't integrate with Radware. If it were F5, we could integrate it. We can integrate F5 with practically anything that integrates with a load balancer, but that's not the case with Alteon."
"I would like for the load balancing to work with premier and the cloud, a mix of premium and cloud."
"I would like to see future enhancements in security, specifically in threat protection."
"We’d like the solution to include more security features in the standard license."
"The reverse proxy piece is a little bit complicated. If the reverse proxy were easier to implement, that would help."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
Radware Alteon is ranked 10th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 33 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 33rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Radware Alteon is rated 8.4, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "It's a good fit for a small team because the maintenance is easier and you don't need to know how to code". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and HAProxy, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.