Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

RadSystems Studio vs ServiceNow Now Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

RadSystems Studio
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
54th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ServiceNow Now Platform
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (8th), No-Code Development Platforms (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

Use RadSystems Studio?
Share your opinion
Fabio QUINTANILHA - PeerSpot reviewer
May 31, 2024
Allows for seamless integration and sharing of common features
The initial setup is straightforward. There are limited access. If you choose not to use scripts, you can still configure the majority of the settings on the platform. The technical aspect of implementing changes is governed by change management processes. Even simple features require careful consideration of communication, documentation, and governance. Despite the setup being relatively straightforward and typically taking one to two weeks to complete once the desired outcome is identified, the implementation phase can often extend for a month or two due to various factors. I rate the initial setup a nine out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is expensive, and I rate it a ten for pricing."
"The product is very expensive."
"Most of the features are included in the licensing cost. However, if we need extra plugins that are not available at the ServiceNow Hub or store, then we have to pay extra for those."
"I don't have much exposure to the costs attached to the solution. I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest price, and ten is the highest price since it is a costly tool."
"People seem to be buying the tool a lot. I think its licensing is okay."
"It's expensive and if you need some analytical views of your activity, there is an additional cost."
"From what I heard, the license for the ServiceNow Now Platform is paid monthly, and on a scale of one to five, I'm rating it a three in terms of pricing, so it's on the cheaper side. I don't know of any additional costs associated with the ServiceNow Now Platform, apart from the standard licensing fees."
"The price of the product falls on the higher side of the spectrum."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
807,508 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about ServiceNow Now Platform?
The integration with other tools is pretty good.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Now Platform?
Pricing for ServiceNow depends on the model. Some models, like GRC and HRSD, are user-specific and can be quite expensive. Others are less costly but are based on the number of tickets or users.
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Now Platform?
The RPA feature in ServiceNow is quite good, but it is very expensive. If AI were better integrated into ServiceNow, it would lower the RPA costs and make the platform more accessible. Additionally...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
experian, beachbody, health partners
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: October 2024.
807,508 professionals have used our research since 2012.