Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] vs Unitrends comparison

Quest Software and Kaseya are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 90% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Read 20 Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

Unitrends

Read 35 Unitrends reviews

1,054 Views
991 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Unitrends

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Quest Rapid Recovery and Unitrends compete in the backup and recovery software category. Quest Rapid Recovery holds an upper hand with its user-friendly design and strong integration with virtual environments, whereas Unitrends is notable for its comprehensive appliance solution and broad OS support.

Features: Quest Rapid Recovery offers integration with virtual environments, built-in encryption, and easy restoration. It provides point-in-time recovery and data compression, making it suitable for physical and virtual server backups. Unitrends is known for its appliance-based approach, instant recovery features, and reporting capabilities, with broad compatibility across operating systems.

Room for Improvement: Quest Rapid Recovery could enhance technical support and add features like file-level backups and better reporting. Users also desire improved Hyper-V snapshot handling. Unitrends could improve in support engagement and simplify its interface, focusing on ease of use and process clarity. Both face feedback on pricing and support cost-effectiveness, with Quest looking to expand support capabilities and Unitrends addressing interface complexities and support response speed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Quest and Unitrends offer on-premises deployment, with Unitrends also providing hybrid cloud options. Quest is favored for its effective support, though it experiences occasional delays. Unitrends faces complex deployment challenges but benefits from knowledgeable support. Quest is slightly preferred for support responsiveness, while Unitrends provides flexibility in deployment strategies.

Pricing and ROI: Quest Rapid Recovery’s pricing is considered high, particularly for basic virtual backups, but users find value in storage efficiency and security features. Unitrends is initially more cost-competitive but has steep renewal pricing, appreciated for its hardware replacement option during renewals. Both highlight risk reduction as primary ROI, with Quest noted for data recovery capabilities and Unitrends for total cost of ownership. Quest’s costs are justified by feature set, whereas Unitrends offers a straightforward licensing model.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Unitrends

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (27th)

Q&A Highlights

it_user177801

IT consultant at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Jul 23, 2023

Software replication to remote sites during disaster recovery?

We have recently implemented Zerto as a disaster recovery solution. Not only does it replicated, it allows you to created boot orders for the VM's. This means you can have your SQL server start and set an automatic delay for the applications servers. It can also be configured to bring a failover test up on an isolated network for DR testing. It can also replicate between different hypervisors. For example, you can replicated from VMware to Hyper-V or AWS. They are adding more hypervisors with newer released.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Adam Augustín

Country Manager at Prianto Ltd

Granular recovery, replication is good and offers good speed

It is for any kind of company that uses their own servers. From a global perspective, our clients are small-sized companies. All the SMEs, compared to the Slovakian market, are quite small. It's a small market with small companies. They just want to enhance security and follow regulations It's…

Read full review

Derek Schneider

Manager, Information Technology at a hospitality company with 201-500 employees

Daily recovery tests have validated restore readiness and ensured consistent data protection

The best features of Unitrends include the daily reporting functionality. When backups fail, it is obvious in the logs what caused the issue. Most times it is a credential problem, which is relatively easy to resolve. Though I have experienced a few more challenging issues, nothing has affected critical backup restore functionality. Every time I have needed to restore something, it has worked successfully. The support team is readily available when I need assistance, and they help walk me through issues, solving them within a reasonable timeframe. The automated backup scheduling feature has helped our organization in managing backup timelines and consistency by handling all the work automatically. We set the schedule, breaking things into smaller chunks since our main common area for files is large. I have staggered the backups so some areas receive more attention than others, particularly for less active data. Adding, removing, excluding, and inputting elements is straightforward. The system makes it simple to schedule portions and generate reports on their functionality. The impact of Unitrends' instant recovery features on strengthening data security measures is significant. I generally use instant recovery when restoring specific files or instances where we need data that has changed. The process involves loading the backup, selecting the desired version, waiting for it to unpack, and retrieving the file. Every restore attempt has been successful. I run instant recovery daily in test mode on two virtual machines. I use it to test my domain controller and file server to ensure they communicate properly in the test environment. This ensures that in case of failure, I can activate the recovery and restore server functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the disaster recovery process from the data center."

"The fact that it can take a snapshot of everything on a server and replicate it on another server in real-time is the most valuable feature."

"Probably the point-in-time recovery is most valuable. The other piece that is really nice is that you can mount a whole server at any point in time. So, you can mount the server with all the drives to a Z drive or something like that. It will just mount it all up, and your data is accessible right there on one drive, which is nice."

"The most valuable feature of Quest Rapid Recovery for our organization is the VM recovery functionality."

"The general backup for replication and virtual standby are the most valuable aspects. It does what it says it does. It's a decent tool for not a big budget."

"The local mount utility is most valuable. I do restores fairly regularly. Thankfully, I have not ever lost an entire server that I've had to resurrect, but I certainly have people who erroneously saved over a file or have deleted a file. So, we've done that quite a bit. We still have the DL4000 appliance, and we had, kind of, extrapolated that out over a five-year period. Now, we're in year six, so we had to add storage, which we did as a SAN next to DL4000, but prior to adding in that extra storage, we, here and there, would run into situations where for whatever reason, it would want to be pulling a new base image, and then we would run out of storage. So, we would utilize the archive feature and archive the old data that we want to hang on to, but we don't necessarily need it taking up current data storage. Being able to export out really old data is most valuable to us. Then, we just store that on a NAS that we keep in another building."

"The compression and deduplication features have helped to save on storage costs."

"The best feature of the solution is the user interface."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pros

"The simple and fast restore routine."

"If you are a large organization, this is a product for you."

"The ability to back up both physical and virtual appliances under one roof."

"Being an appliance-based solution, we were able to migrate backup solutions without having to purchase a lot of hardware separately."

"The ability to backup both physical and virtual machines, along with having an appliance store the backups locally instead of on a file server, NAS, or SAN."

"It is fairly stable."

"Iinstant recovery (allows a spin-up of your image as a VM on the appliance)."

"It is a quick and easy way to organize my backups and to keep track of them."

More Unitrends pros

Cons

"For the most part, it is really good in terms of flexibility and choice of recovery methods. What we found lacking was being able to back up virtual volumes that are clustered. We ran out of luck there. There should be an option for backing up clustered virtual volumes."

"In terms of what needs improvement in Quest Rapid Recovery, though the solution is seamless, right now, they are just giving the software which means we'll need to arrange the hardware. If they can combine the appliance and software, that would be a great approach. In the next release of Quest Rapid Recovery, it would be great if they'd add a folder backup feature because only a snapshot backup feature is available at the moment."

"I think the self-paced learning and knowledge base can always be improved so that users can self-service without having to contact either a reseller or Quest. I know there are things that I would have been looking for to try and solve. And the only way I could get there was to actually open a ticket rather than go through self-service through the portal."

"The initial setup can be tricky, and if not done right, the whole solution needs to be reinstalled."

"It's not really Quest's fault, but the only issue that I had during the time when I was doing a lot of our restores is whenever the server reboots, it has to bring all of the repositories back in again, which takes around five to six hours to pull eight terabytes back in again."

"The terminology didn't seem easily available. When I go to the website, it is hard to search for things. You get all the articles, then you finally get the search button. They need the search at the top of the knowledge base. Then, on occasion, if you get an error message in the system, which is very important, it says, "Click here for more information," but I never get more information. The search engine doesn't find it or it is some weird error. It has never worked for me."

"Sometimes, when we have certain batches for Windows, it needs to be restarted. When it's restarted, the service is configured as a delayed start. Sometimes, you need to wait too long until it rights itself, or you have to do it manually."

"It is quite surprising to me that the configuration cannot be backed up automatically, and I think that Rapid Recovery should have an option for scheduled configuration backup."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] cons

"It would be great to have the job throttle/limit the max number of backups on a single ESXi host."

"There's a lot that can be made better. For example, it could be more scalable."

"There are a few quirks where the GUI, agent, and back-end are not precisely meshed."

"Comparing the features and the working pattern, definitely they have to come down on pricing if they want to compete in the market."

"Support is great for small simple issues, but anything more difficult, it is hard to get good resolutions without having to badger them and their management."

"Making the seeding process more accessible and easier to understand. Also, make more of the undocumented best practices easier to find."

"The solution's base operating system needs to be improved."

"The ability to run just differentials without pulling the full on your archive."

More Unitrends cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing fees are based on the amount of data that you want to store, which is related to how many customers you want to cover."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"I believe the basic license comes with six terabytes, whereas a lot of the other ones are four terabytes. From the price point, it seemed a lot better than the comparative models, such as Datto, Barracuda, and some of the others. I believe Barracuda was about $15,000 for four terabytes, and Quest was around $12,000 for six terabytes. Pricing is based on the period. There is just the maintenance fee that you have to pay annually, or you can pay for a three-year or four-year contract. This includes Premier Support."

"When I purchased the change to the license, it was $1,600. I think that was for changing the license. I don't believe that I had to purchase technical support in a while, so I must've bought maybe for five years, but I don't feel there was a huge cost involved in technical support. Its cost was definitely worth it because we've had a fantastic experience with them."

"I'm not aware of the exact cost of Quest Rapid Recovery because I'm from the technical team, but in general, the solution is quite competitive cost-wise."

"It is a little expensive. However, I haven't compared it to other solutions. Being a nonprofit, it is always good to have nonprofit discounts on products."

"Its price is okay. It is reasonable in terms of the way it works."

"I don't think the licensing for the product is very expensive."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pricing and cost advice

"You should be aware how much the monthly costs are to use, what the initial costs for hardware are, and what the options to expand are, if needed."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a four out of ten. The licensing is yearly and it depends on the customers."

"Based on a scale of one to ten, with one being low and ten being high, I would rate the pricing of this solution as a three. Also, there are no additional costs involved in the standard licensing of the solution."

"No comment."

"Unitrends is an expensive solution."

"We found that the cost of Unitrends was about the same as the Dell DR6300. We liked the fact that the Unitrends appliance was all-in-one."

"With respect to cost, my advice is to get what you need."

"Pricing model constantly changes."

More Unitrends pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

it_user177801

IT consultant at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Sep 20, 2016

Software replication to remote sites during disaster recovery?

2 out of 16 answers

it_user157908

Tower Architect at Atos

Jan 5, 2015

Hello, Check the VBA module from networker legato software, it might be what you need. Kind Regards, John.

Read full answer

it_user136023

Consultant at EMC

Jan 5, 2015

So does that mean you want to have a Disaster Recovery solution where data is not on site your bunker site? but yet allows for a fast recovery in case your primary site is down? - What virtualization solution do you use? - What is the link between the 2 (?) sites? - What RPO and RTO are you aiming for? - How much data do you need to recover?

Read full answer

See all 16 answers

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Performing Arts

10%

Computer Software Company

Non Profit

Retailer

16%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Educational Organization

11%

Non Profit

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Quest Rapid Recovery?

The most valuable feature of Quest Rapid Recovery for our organization is the VM recovery functionality.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Rapid Recovery?

Dell solutions are approximately 30% to 35% more expensive than Veeam.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest Rapid Recovery?

The product is expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about Unitrends?

The most valuable feature of Unitrends for me is the automated feedback

See all answers

What needs improvement with Unitrends?

In terms of improvement, the UI, especially in the recovery section, is unclear about which repository it uses—I had to hover over to find that information. Figuring out the scripting part wasn't s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Unitrends?

I use Unitrends to back up my VMware virtual machines and files, ensuring redundancy for both disks and protection against ransomware. I have implemented an air gap strategy by keeping some backups...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

NetVault Plus vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Rubrik vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Unitrends

Compared 38% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Unitrends

Compared 12% of the time

Rubrik vs Unitrends

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Unitrends

Compared 11% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs Unitrends

Compared 10% of the time

More Unitrends Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

October 2025

Download Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Unitrends

October 2025

Download Unitrends product report

Also Known As

Dell AppAssure

No data available

Overview

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] provides easy-to-use backup and recovery capabilities, emphasizing granular recovery and point-in-time restoration with simple installation, data replication, and user-friendly navigation.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] helps manage infrastructure environments with features supporting disk backup, archiving, VM standby, and replication. Despite limitations like sluggish GUI, lack of support for tape and Mac, and high memory use, users appreciate its real-time data replication and strong reliability. The tool is employed in on-prem deployments and aids in disaster recovery, protecting data across cloud and on-premise servers, securing databases, and facilitating quick recovery during failures.

What are Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]'s key features?

Ease of Use: Simplifies operations with a user-friendly interface.
Granular Recovery: Allows detailed data retrieval.
Point-in-Time Restoration: Enables specific time data recovery.
Real-time Replication: Ensures up-to-date data replication.
Compression and Deduplication: Streamlines data management.

What benefits can users expect from Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]?

Improved Storage Efficiency: Enhanced by archiving and disk backup support.
Flexibility: Utilizing VM standby and replication features.
Reliability: Offers fast emergency recovery with minimal admin burden.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] is integral for industries requiring robust data protection, encompassing crucial server and database backups in compliance-focused environments with SQL databases and Hyper-V hosts, ensuring swift and dependable recovery solutions.

Quest Software

Unitrends offers cloud replication, remote management, and instant recovery, making it highly versatile for backup needs across physical and virtual nodes. Its seamless functionality and robust support ensure enhanced operational efficiency.

Unitrends is known for its ability to integrate with physical and virtual environments, ideal for backing up Azure VMs, local systems, and diverse operating systems. Users employ Unitrends for daily backups, disaster recovery, and file recovery tasks, protecting servers, VMware, Hyper-V clusters, and legacy systems. Real-time synchronization and monitoring are key to its efficiency, although some areas like interface and support structure require refinement. Pricing and stability concerns, as well as SQL backup sensitivity, suggest room for improvement. Users often encounter issues with billing, renewals, and dual VPN support, seeking more scalable and affordable options.

What are the key features of Unitrends?

Cloud Replication: Enables seamless backup across cloud environments.
Instant Recovery: Provides immediate access to data during disruptions.
Remote Management: Facilitates easy management of backup tasks remotely.
Global Deduplication: Significantly reduces backup sizes.
Real-time Synchronization: Ensures up-to-date data storage.

What benefits should users expect from Unitrends?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced through its seamless interface and powerful reporting.
Reliability: Offers robust protection against ransomware.
Versatility: Supports diverse operating systems and environments.
Technical Support: Provides consistent and reliable assistance.

In industries like healthcare, financial services, and education, Unitrends plays a critical role in maintaining data integrity and accessibility. It is implemented to simplify backup processes, minimize downtime, and ensure compliance with data protection regulations, offering a comprehensive security strategy.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

PRIME aerostructures GmbH, Tamworth Regional Council, Rhondda Housing Association, Stadtwerke Pforzheim GmbH & Co., Guangdong Aiyingdao Childrens Department Store, Nspyre, Tarrant Technology Partners, CloudRunner

NHL Players Association, Salvation Army, Sligro Food Group, Mason General Hospital, Tec Group, Saldab IT, Baker Tilly, Clinton Savings Bank, Ennit Magna Bank, Manukau Institute of Technology

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.