No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management vs The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualys Enterprise TruRisk M...
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
The Nagomi Proactive Defens...
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
22nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category, the mindshare of Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management is 2.3%. The mindshare of The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform is 1.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management2.3%
The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform1.1%
Other96.6%
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Roshan Ugale - PeerSpot reviewer
Junior Associate at ESDS Software Solution Limited
Comprehensive risk scanning has protected servers and improves monthly vulnerability remediation
Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management has a few things that need to be enhanced. First, there is the issue of superseded patches. Superseded means if we miss the current month patch, for example, if we miss the January patch to deploy on a particular server, Microsoft includes January changes in the second month security patch, and then the second month security patch includes all things in March. For example, if we miss two month patches and we directly deploy the March month security patch on a system, the other two patches, such as January and February, will be closed. Superseded means these patches are not deployed on a system, but after the latest one, which we already deployed, the older one does not need to be installed or deployed on a system. Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management takes a report of each and every vulnerability and shows that the January month patch was not deployed on a system and the February month patch was not deployed on a system. However, that is not a proper scanning method. If we have already deployed the latest patch that includes the older security things or older security parameters and the latest parameters, when we deploy that latest patch, why does Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management show the older patches also in potential vulnerabilities? That is a main factor that should be improved from Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management. Second, the remedies provided by Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management are sometimes not useful most of the time. In that case, we need to troubleshoot or find out the remedies by ourselves. The remedies will also be something that needs to be improved in the system or in the application.
Pasan Jayarathna - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Security Engineer at Cyberwell Solution
Centralized insights have improved vulnerability tracking and simplified cross-tool comparisons
The best features The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform offers is the ability to compare each tool. For example, both Tenable and Cortex provide security protection. In scenarios where we did not deploy Cortex XDR to some devices, we can identify this through The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform because it compares data with the Tenable side. This allows us to perform cross-checking between Tenable and Cortex. If we miss Cortex deployment for end devices, that endpoint could be vulnerable to our cloud applications, so this capability is invaluable. The main feature is the ability to check vulnerabilities. Beyond that, we can cross-check any misconfiguration and missing configuration, such as Cortex missing or Tenable vulnerability management missing on end devices. The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform shows us a summary of vulnerabilities, which gives us an idea about the security posture of our entire environment. Based on this information, we can decide what security gaps exist on our network and provide solutions to fix these vulnerability gaps. For example, some end devices may not be updated. The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform checks all summaries and provides a list of assets that are not updated. It gives a complete list by CVE of all devices that are not updated, which we can then provide to our team for remediation. We can request that they upgrade applications such as Google Chrome across all devices.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management is a very good software application to scan each and every vulnerability and, through that, it prevents the attackers from exploiting the systems, servers, or our data and prevents data leaks in short."
"Regarding its competitors in the market, I believe Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management has a strong offering."
"Qualys is a very good tool for companies, and the different tools this brand offers bring all the necessary tools for good development for these companies."
"The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform allows us to save our time and protect our system and network."
 

Cons

"Second, the remedies provided by Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management are sometimes not useful most of the time. In that case, we need to troubleshoot or find out the remedies by ourselves."
"When a customer does not have control over vulnerabilities or architecture and needs a solution that automates this function for the company, it can be difficult to identify the vulnerabilities."
"However, I am not satisfied with Qualys support. The response time is slower than needed."
"My main concern is that The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform would be better if it were more user-friendly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management?
The live threat intelligence updates in Qualys are good, with updates provided on the last Friday of each month. However, I am not satisfied with Qualys support. The response time is slower than ne...
What is your primary use case for Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management?
Primarily, I use Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management for assessing the current posture of my infrastructure as I am responsible for vulnerability management for my organization. Qualys Enterprise ...
What advice do you have for others considering Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management?
Agentic AI is one of the models running in the background for Qualys. It is responsible for all vulnerability closures and vulnerability testing. All data collected by agents in the field is gather...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Zafran Security, Cymulate and others in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). Updated: March 2026.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.