Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs SBOM Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
4th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (8th), Patch Management (4th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (3rd)
SBOM Studio
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
24th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SBOM Studio is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Supply Chain Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management2.0%
SBOM Studio0.9%
Other97.1%
Software Supply Chain Security
 

Featured Reviews

Nicki Møller - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Enables automation and quick access to necessary information
One of the significant challenges Qualys is discovery, which I know Microsoft excels at. I can't recall how well Qualys performs this function; it seems I might be missing some details. However, if there's one key aspect to focus on, it's discovery—the ability to identify assets that you are not aware of, even when you can see they are present. Understanding what those assets are is crucial. With Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, it was very difficult to extract detections from the system. The features within Qualys are limited to what they have developed. Sometimes a complete overview is needed to push to a Power BI dashboard, Splunk, ServiceNow, or other platforms. The export process is incredibly challenging. We needed a developer to write a hundred-line Python script that would loop over certain assets due to export limitations. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management could improve its integration capabilities. While it generates substantial data, correlating it with other data sources can be challenging. The export process is difficult, and pre-built integrations with other tools could be enhanced for better process implementation.
Use SBOM Studio?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise23
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
We purchased it through a reseller and the pricing was reasonable. We received Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management included in our licensing at no cost for the first year.
What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
The TruRisk feature could help prioritize vulnerabilities and assets, but our issue currently is that we weren't provided with adequate information to set things up correctly. We have many configur...
What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
My use cases involve using Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management to detect vulnerabilities and then passing on the information to our IT team that has to fix the vulnerabilities. The External Attac...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Google 4. IBM 5. Intel 6. Microsoft 7. Oracle 8. SAP 9. VMware 10. Accenture 11. Capgemini 12. Deloitte 13. EY 14. KPMG 15. PwC 16. AWS 17. Azure 18. Google Cloud 19. IBM Cloud 20. Oracle Cloud 21. SAP Cloud 22. VMware Cloud 23. Arista Networks 24. Juniper Networks 25. NetApp 26. Cloudflare 27. Fastly 28. Incapsula 29. Imperva 30. Zscaler
Find out what your peers are saying about JFrog, Mend.io, Docker and others in Software Supply Chain Security. Updated: December 2025.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.