Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

QPR ProcessDesigner vs TIBCO Nimbus Control comparison

QPR Software and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. QPR Software is ranked #26, while TIBCO is ranked #22. QPR Software holds a 0.5% mindshare in BPD, compared to TIBCO’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of QPR Software users are willing to recommend the solution.
QPR ProcessDesigner
Read 2 QPR ProcessDesigner reviews
  • 222 Views
  • 220 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
TIBCO Nimbus Control
Read 1 TIBCO Nimbus Control review
  • 253 Views
  • 235 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessDesigner and TIBCO Nimbus Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, SAP and others in Business Process Design.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Design Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 862,514 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessDesigner
Ranking in Business Process Design
26th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TIBCO Nimbus Control
Ranking in Business Process Design
22nd
Average Rating
5.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessDesigner is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Nimbus Control is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Design
 

Featured Reviews

it_user794370 - PeerSpot reviewer
It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes
BPM/BPI activities in various business areas. This has been particularly useful in end user workshops where people are able to see and comment on actual process model immediately. This focuses communication and makes it easier to avoid misunderstandings Processes become clearer, easier to…
Read full review
CW
It is overly complicated. It tends to get more engagement from people across the business.
Capturing business processes so they can be used as an operating manual for the business or a quality management system I have used it with clients. It helps them find information when they need to know how to do their jobs effectively. The process mapping approach is ideal for understanding how…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"​Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"It helps clients find information when they need to know how to do their jobs effectively."
"It tends to get more engagement from people across the business."
 

Cons

"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
"This product could probably do with less features rather than more. It is overly complicated. In recent releases, it has become harder to use."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
862,514 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QPR ProcessDesigner Logo
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QPR ProcessDesigner
Compared 44% of the time
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs QPR ProcessDesigner Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs QPR ProcessDesigner
Compared 30% of the time
ARIS BPA vs QPR ProcessDesigner Logo
ARIS BPA vs QPR ProcessDesigner
Compared 26% of the time
More QPR ProcessDesigner Competitors
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs TIBCO Nimbus Control Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs TIBCO Nimbus Control
Compared 57% of the time
Visio vs TIBCO Nimbus Control Logo
Visio vs TIBCO Nimbus Control
Compared 43% of the time
More TIBCO Nimbus Control Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
June 2025
QPR ProcessDesigner reportDownload QPR ProcessDesigner product report
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
June 2025
TIBCO Nimbus Control reportDownload TIBCO Nimbus Control product report
 

Also Known As

ProcessGuide, QPR Software ProcessGuide
Nimbus Control
 

Overview

Describe, analyze, communicate and improve your processes with QPR ProcessGuide, an all-inclusive multiuser process management software. QPR ProcessGuide helps your organization in their EBPA/BPA work by taking into consideration the needs of business users as well as IT experts.
QPR Software
Nimbus Control is a software suite designed to enable organizations to capture, analyze and communicate a common set of processes that can be used to manage an organization.
TIBCO
 

Sample Customers

ALPLA
Air France-KLM, Airbus Helicopters, Alestra, Allianz Ireland, Ausgrid, Avantium, Bank of Montreal, Barclaycard, BNL, BVC (Columbia Stock Exchange), Cameron, Child Support Agency
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, SAP and others in Business Process Design. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
862,514 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.