We performed a comparison between ProcessMaker and SoftExpert BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"The most valuable feature of SoftExpert BPM is its ease of use."
"A complete project management suite in one integrated package."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
"The form in SoftExpert BPM should improve."
"It could do more to use all the data it collects to intelligently manage the user experience."
Earn 20 points
ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM) while SoftExpert BPM is ranked 23rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. ProcessMaker is rated 7.6, while SoftExpert BPM is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SoftExpert BPM writes "Quick deployment, high availability, and easy to use". ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Nintex Process Platform, whereas SoftExpert BPM is most compared with . See our ProcessMaker vs. SoftExpert BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
