PractiTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

PractiTest and Microsoft are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. PractiTest is ranked #18, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5. PractiTest holds a 2.5% mindshare in TMT, compared to Microsoft’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PractiTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

255 Views
175 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 52 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

357 Views
292 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

PractiTest

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Visual Studio Test Professional and PractiTest are popular test management tools. PractiTest appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and excellent customer support.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional integrates well with Visual Studio and Azure DevOps, facilitating seamless workflows. It also enhances the development process within the Microsoft ecosystem. PractiTest provides customizable dashboards, full traceability, versatile investigation and debugging tools, and supports extensive reporting and project overview.

Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional needs better test case management and improved integration capabilities. Users recommend enhancements for smoother workflows. PractiTest requires improvements in automation features and better CI/CD integration. Feedback also points to increasing the robustness of automated testing processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional offers straightforward deployment within Microsoft environments but has a steep learning curve. PractiTest is highlighted for its intuitive setup and excellent customer support, offering detailed documentation and responsive helpdesk assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional users indicate satisfaction with initial setup costs but have mixed feelings about long-term ROI due to licensing costs. PractiTest is perceived as offering good value for money, with a positive ROI due to enhanced productivity and feature robustness. PractiTest's cost structure is seen as more transparent and justified by its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed PractiTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

PractiTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PractiTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (21st)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of PractiTest is 2.5%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 2.5%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ

Chief Product Officer at Gradiant

Provides extensive extensions and plugins for seamless AI product development

Our primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional is as a development tool. We develop software primarily in Python, specifically for applications related to artificial intelligence. We use frameworks like PyTorch for training models and developing applications using these models. This tool…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

"Easy to use and easily scalable."

"It's great for the development of .NET."

"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."

"You can easily write code, test, and deploy within the same environment. It is a mature tool. It regularly receives new updates and versions. In my opinion, it's one of the best products by Microsoft for developers."

"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."

"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."

"Its UI could be better."

"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."

"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."

"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."

"The documentation is limited."

"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."

"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its scalability."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

"The tool is affordable."

"We use the solution’s community version, and the solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

"The tool is expensive in my region."

"It is a price-effective solution"

"I positioned it at a mid-range level. It isn't an inexpensive solution, but considering its capabilities, it represents excellent value for the functionalities it offers."

"The product is very expensive."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is not an expensive solution."

"There are two versions of Visual Studio Test Professional: Community and Professional. We are currently using the Community version, but if we start working on a commercial product, we will consider upgrading to the Professional version. We need to identify how we will proceed with our projects, and based on that, we will decide on our licensing."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?

The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface. Currently, I need to search online to find out how to use certain functions. This feature would save time by providing direct assi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 30% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 28% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 23% of the time

TestRail vs PractiTest

Compared 19% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 23% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 14% of the time

Qt Squish vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 13% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

April 2025

Download PractiTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

April 2025

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Overview

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

PractiTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

April 2025

Free Report: PractiTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about PractiTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PractiTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.