We performed a comparison between PractiTest and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"Object Identification Wizard."
"The use of automation is most valuable."
"The initial setup isn't too difficult."
"The reporting is really nice."
"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."
"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."
"It's integrated with different technologies, desktop applications, package solutions like SAP, and mobile applications."
"We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
"With regard to areas of improvement, report customization should be easier. It would be good if Tosca could provide standard reports for at least 20 variants. At present, there are only three to four variants. The mobile engine needs to be faster and easier to use; it is a bit cumbersome. Also, the object identification in the mobile engine needs improvement. I would like to see easy-to-use customizations for reports in the next release."
"A disadvantage of Tricentis Tosca is that you have to customize it according to your need, during the early stages of the software, particularly during upstream testing, before system and unit testing."
"The product needs to improve its pricing. It also needs to improve the infrastructure and DEX agent setup."
"I would like to see better integration with other testing tools."
"The support we received from Tricentis Tosca was good, but it can improve."
"Very difficult to get information about licensing costs."
"It can be quite expensive."
"Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use."
Earn 20 points
PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Regression Testing Tools with 96 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.8, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise, Jira and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
